Field test of a bubble curtain deterrent system for common carp

Reducing the movement of invasive fish such as the common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., silver carp, Hypophthalmicthys molitrix (Val.), and bighead carp, Hypophthalmicthys nobilis (Richardson), is one of the greatest challenges fisheries managers are presently facing (Taylor et al. 2003, 2005; Ruebush et al. 2012). Because physical barriers (dams, screens) and electrical barriers are non-selective, can be prohibitively expensive and impractical to maintain, there has been an increasing interest in barriers that use behavioural deterrents (i.e. sound, light and bubbles) as they have the potential to be safer, inexpensive and species specific (Popper & Carlson 1998; Taylor et al. 2003, 2005; Noatch & Suski 2012; Ruebush et al. 2012). As behavioural deterrents do not provide a physical obstacle to movement, they are <100% effective. Accordingly, whether these deterrents can be useful depends on their relative efficacy vs cost relative to management goals (i.e. controlling an established population vs blocking a new invasion). This study focused on bubble curtains, a deterrent technology that uses a dense plume of (noisy) bubbles to repel fish with acute hearing (Zielinski et al. 2014). These systems are inexpensive, but their performance has not been well documented in the field for invasive carps (but see Ruebush et al. 2012). In a previous laboratory study, an optimised bubble curtain deterrent system was found to reduce the movement of small common carp [total length: 259 29 mm (mean SD)] by 75–80% (Zielinski et al. 2014). The objective of this study was to test the efficacy of this bubble curtain system in the field. Cyprinus carpio is a highly invasive fish from Eurasia (Balon 1995), which is already well established and implicated in degrading millions of acres of shallow lake and wetland ecosystems across the globe (Weber & Brown 2009). In Midwestern North America, C. carpio abundance appears to be attributable to the tendency of adult fish to leave lakes and use wetlands for spawning, which often lack native predators of juvenile carp (Bajer & Sorensen 2010). A key to the long-term control of this species could lie in blocking a large proportion of downstream-moving juveniles from leaving these wetland systems and/or stopping adults from entering them to spawn. Extant barrier technologies are not suited to this task because screening small enough to stop juvenile fish clogs easily (Bainbridge 1964) and electrical barriers are expensive and cannot stop downstream-moving fish which drift through them. This study tested the ability of a previously developed bubble curtain system (Zielinski et al. 2014) in Kohlman Creek, Maplewood, Minnesota, USA (45°01036′′ N 93°02048′′ W). This stream links a known C. carpio nursery and a chain of lakes. At the time of this study, the headwaters of Kohlman Creek supported nearly 30 000 young-of-year C. carpio (Osborne 2012), while the downstream lakes contained about 6000 adult C. carpio (Bajer et al. 2011). Kohlman Creek is about 6 m wide and 0.75 m deep. This study location allowed the testing of both upand downstream movement, but in other ways was less than ideal because it was narrowly confined and subject to heavy flooding at times. A bubble curtain was installed that had six perforated PVC pipes mounted on a 4-m-long steel frame, which was attached to docks on both sides of the stream (Fig. 1). Netting was placed around the docks along with V-traps to prevent fish from bypassing the bubble curtain. The

[1]  E. Balon Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio: from Roman gourmets to the swimming flowers , 1995 .

[2]  J. R. Stauffer,et al.  Responses of fish to a strobe light/ air-bubble barrier , 1985 .

[3]  Thomas J. Carlson,et al.  Application of Sound and other Stimuli to Control Fish Behavior , 1998 .

[4]  Przemyslaw G. Bajer,et al.  Recruitment and abundance of an invasive fish, the common carp, is driven by its propensity to invade and reproduce in basins that experience winter-time hypoxia in interconnected lakes , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[5]  P. Bajer,et al.  Using the Judas technique to locate and remove wintertime aggregations of invasive common carp , 2011 .

[6]  T. Akamatsu,et al.  Empirical refinements applicable to the recording of fish sounds in small tanks. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Perrya,et al.  USING A NON-PHYSICAL BEHAVIOURAL BARRIER TO ALTER MIGRATION ROUTING OF JUVENILE CHINOOK SALMON IN THE SACRAMENTO – SAN JOAQUIN RIVER DELTA , 2012 .

[8]  J. Chick,et al.  Response of bighead carp to a bioacoustic behavioural fish guidance system , 2005 .

[9]  R. Bainbridge The problem of excluding fish from water intakes , 1964 .

[10]  Jacob B. Osborne Distribution, abundance and overwinter survival of young-of-the-year common carp in a Midwestern watershed. , 2012 .

[11]  A. Popper Pure‐Tone Auditory Thresholds for the Carp, Cyprinis carpio , 1972 .

[12]  C. Suski,et al.  Non-physical barriers to deter fish movements , 2012 .

[13]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[14]  J. R. Burau,et al.  USING A NON‐PHYSICAL BEHAVIOURAL BARRIER TO ALTER MIGRATION ROUTING OF JUVENILE CHINOOK SALMON IN THE SACRAMENTO–SAN JOAQUIN RIVER DELTA , 2014 .

[15]  M. Brown,et al.  Effects of Common Carp on Aquatic Ecosystems 80 Years after “Carp as a Dominant”: Ecological Insights for Fisheries Management , 2009 .

[16]  J. S. Welton,et al.  The efficacy of air, sound and acoustic bubble screens in deflecting Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts in the River Frome, UK , 2002 .

[17]  Allen F. Mensinger,et al.  Laboratory experiments demonstrate that bubble curtains can effectively inhibit movement of common carp , 2014 .

[18]  J. Chick,et al.  In-situ tests of sound-bubble-strobe light barrier technologies to prevent range expansions of Asian carp , 2012 .