Influence of the Adjacency Effect on Ground Reflectance Measurements

It is well known that the adjacency effect has to be taken into account during the retrieval of surface reflectance from high spatial resolution satellite imagery. The effect results from atmospheric scattering, depends on the reflectance contrast between a target pixel and its large-scale neighborhood, and decreases with wavelength. Recently, ground reflectance field measurements were published, claiming a substantial influence of the adjacency effect at short distance measurements (< 2 m), and an increase of the effect with wavelength. The authors repeated similar field measurements and found that the adjacency effect usually has a negligible influence at short distances, decreasing with wavelength in agreement with theory, but can have a small influence in high-reflectance contrast environments. Radiative transfer calculations were performed to quantify the influence at short and long distances for cases of practical interest (vegetation and soil in a low-reflectance background). For situations with large reflectance contrasts, the atmospheric backscatter component of the adjacency effect can influence ground measurements over small-area targets, and should therefore be taken into account. However, it is not possible to draw a general conclusion, since some of the considered surfaces are known for exhibiting strong directional effects

[1]  Xue Chen,et al.  Target adjacency effect estimation using ground spectrum measurement and Landsat-5 Satellite data , 2006, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  Effect of Atmospheric Conditions on Remote sensing of a Surface Nonhomogeneity , 2008 .

[3]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  The effect of Earth's atmosphere on contrast reduction·for a nonuniform surface albedo and ‘two-halves’ field , 1980 .

[4]  R. S. Fraser,et al.  Adjacency effects on imaging by surface reflection and atmospheric scattering: cross radiance to zenith. , 1979, Applied optics.

[5]  R. Richter On the in-flight absolute calibration of high spatial resolution spaceborne sensors using small ground targets , 1997 .

[6]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Determination of land and ocean reflective, radiative, and biophysical properties using multiangle imaging , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Robert O. Green,et al.  On-orbit radiometric and spectral calibration characteristics of EO-1 Hyperion derived with an underflight of AVIRIS and in situ measurements at Salar de Arizaro, Argentina , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  The atmospheric effect on the separability of field classes measured from satellites , 1985 .

[9]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Reflectance- and radiance-based methods for the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors , 1987 .

[10]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  R. Richter A fast atmospheric correction algorithm applied to Landsat TM images , 1990 .

[12]  Raymond F. Kokaly,et al.  Surface Reflectance Calibration of Terrestrial Imaging Spectroscopy Data : a Tutorial Using AVIRIS , 2002 .

[13]  P. Deschamps,et al.  Influence of the background contribution upon space measurements of ground reflectance. , 1981, Applied optics.