Enabling Control in the Minimally Conscious State in a Single Session with a Three Channel BCI

The study aimed to detect awareness in a single participant, diagnosed minimally conscious for the past 11 years, using an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI), and to determine if real-time feedback enhances our ability to detect awareness in a single session. After 90 trials involving motor imagery (MI) with no feedback hand grasp vs. wiggle toes could be classified with ~82% accuracy with only three EEG channels. In the same session we subsequently provided real-time feedback with two games where the participant was instructed to move a ball and a spaceship, respectively, to reach a target by performing the same MI tasks. ~77% ball and 80% spaceship control was achieved. At the outset of the experiment the participant did not seem attentive or interested however after the feedback runs the participant was noticeably more attentive. Family members in attendance at the experiment commented on the noticeable changes in demeanor of the participant who had provided no overt indication of language comprehension or other cognitive function since diagnosis. The results indicate that real-time feedback should be used in the detection of awareness to inform the completely locked-in of the potential of (BCI) technology as a means of communication (i.e., that it is not just another assessment) and motivate engagement.

[1]  F. C. Wilson,et al.  Analysis of Wessex Head Injury Matrix (WHIM) scores in consecutive vegetative and minimally conscious state patients , 2009, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[2]  Srivas Chennu,et al.  Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study , 2011, The Lancet.

[3]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. , 2006, Science.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[5]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Separability of EEG signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Fernando Lopes da Silva,et al.  Comprar Niedermeyer's Electroencephalography, 6/e (Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields ) | Fernando Lopes Da Silva | 9780781789424 | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins , 2010 .

[8]  R. Munday,et al.  The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMART): A Comprehensive and Integrated Assessment and Treatment Protocol for the Vegetative State and Minimally Responsive Patient , 1999 .

[9]  T. Martin McGinnity,et al.  A Time-Frequency Approach to Feature Extraction for a Brain-Computer Interface with a Comparative Analysis of Performance Measures , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  T. Martin McGinnity,et al.  EEG-based continuous control of a game using a 3 channel motor imagery BCI: BCI game , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB).

[11]  Damien Coyle,et al.  Achievable Brain Computer Communication through Short Intensive Motor Imagery Training despite Long Term Spinal Cord Injury , 2011 .

[12]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Better than random? A closer look on BCI results , 2008 .

[13]  T.M. McGinnity,et al.  A time-series prediction approach for feature extraction in a brain-computer interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Damien Coyle,et al.  Neural network based auto association and time-series prediction for biosignal processing in brain-computer interfaces , 2009, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[15]  A. Owen,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of the vegetative state , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.