Using Insights from Psychology and Language to Improve How People Reason with Description Logics

Inspired by insights from theories of human reasoning and language, we propose additions to the Manchester OWL Syntax to improve comprehensibility. These additions cover: functional and inverse functional properties, negated conjunction, the definition of exceptions, and existential and universal restrictions. By means of an empirical study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of a number of these additions, in particular: the use of solely to clarify the uniqueness of the object in a functional property; the replacement of and with intersection in conjunction, which was particularly beneficial in negated conjunction; the use of except as a substitute for and not; and the replacement of some with including and only with noneOrOnly, which helped in certain situations to clarify the nature of these restrictions.

[1]  Kent A. Spackman,et al.  Reproducibility of interpreting "and" and "or" in terminology systems , 1998, AMIA.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Robert Stevens,et al.  The Manchester OWL Syntax , 2006, OWLED.

[4]  Sangeet Khemlani,et al.  Negating compound sentences , 2012, CogSci.

[5]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  S. M. García,et al.  2014: , 2020, A Party for Lazarus.

[7]  Gem Stapleton,et al.  Does the Orientation of an Euler Diagram Affect User Comprehension? , 2012, DMS.

[8]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Propositional reasoning by model. , 1992, Psychological review.

[9]  Richard Power,et al.  Measuring the Understandability of Deduction Rules for OWL , 2012, WoDOOM@EKAW.

[10]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Against Logical Form , 2010 .

[11]  Robert Stevens,et al.  OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns , 2004, EKAW.

[12]  Enrico Motta,et al.  The Usability of Description Logics - Understanding the Cognitive Difficulties Presented by Description Logics , 2014, ESWC.

[13]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[14]  Samantha Bail,et al.  The Cognitive Complexity of OWL Justifications , 2011, Description Logics.

[15]  L. Rips Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning. , 1983 .

[16]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Making sense of description logics , 2015, SEMANTiCS.

[17]  Graeme S Halford,et al.  : The development of deductive reasoning: How important is complexity? , 2004 .

[18]  Alan L. Rector Defaults, Context, and Knowledge: Alternatives for OWL-Indexed Knowledge Bases , 2004, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.