Locational uncertainty in georeferencing public health datasets

The assignment of locational attributes to a study subject in epidemiologic analyses is commonly referred to as georeferencing. When georeferencing study subjects to a point location using their residential street address, most researchers rely on the street centerline data model. This study assessed the potential locational bias introduced using street centerline data. It also evaluated georeferencing effects on a location-dependent, exposure assessment process. For comparison purposes, subjects were georeferenced to the center of their residential parcel of land using digitized parcel maps. A total of 10,026 study subjects residing in Jefferson County, Alabama were georeferenced using both street centerline and residential parcel methods. The mean nondirectional, linear distance between points georeferenced using both methods was 246 ft with a range of 11 to 13,260 ft. Correlation coefficients comparing differences in exposure estimates were generated for all 10,026 subjects. Coefficients increased as the geographic areas of analysis around study subjects increased, indicating the influence of nondifferential exposure misclassification.

[1]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Arsenic in Drinking Water and Incidence of Urinary Cancers , 1997, Epidemiology.

[2]  B S Schwartz,et al.  Environmental risk factors for Lyme disease identified with geographic information systems. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[3]  H. Seligson,et al.  GIS mapping of earthquake-related deaths and hospital admissions from the 1994 Northridge, California, Earthquake. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[4]  Ryan S. Miller,et al.  Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a Geographic Information System. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  G Lapidus,et al.  Using a geographic information system to understand child pedestrian injury. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[6]  Minhe Ji,et al.  Spatial accuracy of the EPA's environmental hazards databases and their use in environmental equity analyses , 1997 .

[7]  P. Gergen,et al.  Race, income, urbanicity, and asthma hospitalization in California: a small area analysis. , 1998, Chest.

[8]  Gregory A. Elmes,et al.  Men and heart disease : an atlas of racial and ethnic disparities in mortality , 2001 .

[9]  Frederick R. Broome,et al.  Geographic information systems (GIS): new perspectives in understanding human health and environmental relationships. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Linda W. Pickle,et al.  Atlas of United States Mortality , 1996 .

[11]  K. C. Clarke,et al.  On epidemiology and geographic information systems: a review and discussion of future directions. , 1996, Emerging infectious diseases.

[12]  William J. Blot,et al.  Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the United States 1950-94 , 2000 .

[13]  Female Breast Cancer and Trihalomethane Levels in Drinking Water in North Carolina , 1998, Epidemiology.

[14]  T O Talbot,et al.  Breast cancer risk and residence near industry or traffic in Nassau and Suffolk Counties, Long Island, New York. , 1996, Archives of environmental health.

[15]  R Neutra,et al.  Examining associations between childhood asthma and traffic flow using a geographic information system. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Solid waste and pancreatic cancer: an ecologic study in Florida, USA. , 1998, International journal of epidemiology.