Outcomes of HIV treatment from the private sector in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

Introduction Private sector provision of HIV treatment is increasing in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, there is limited documentation of its outcomes. This protocol reports a proposed systematic review that will synthesise clinical outcomes of private sector HIV treatment in LMIC. Methods and analysis This review will be conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses protocols. Primary outcomes will include: (1) proportion of eligible patients initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART); (2) proportion of those on ART with <1000 copies/mL; (3) rate of all-cause mortality among ART recipients. Secondary outcomes will include: (1) proportion receiving Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia prophylaxis; (2) proportion with >90% ART adherence (based on any measure reported); (3) proportion screened for non-communicable diseases (specifically cervical cancer, diabetes, hypertension and mental ill health); (iv) proportion screened for tuberculosis. A search of five electronic bibliographical databases (Embase, Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL) and reference lists of included articles will be conducted to identify relevant articles reporting HIV clinical outcomes. Searches will be limited to LMIC. No age, publication date, study-design or language limits will be applied. Authors of relevant studies will be contacted for clarification. Two reviewers will independently screen citations and abstracts, identify full text articles for inclusion, extract data and appraise the quality and bias of included studies. Outcome data will be pooled to generate aggregative proportions of primary and secondary outcomes. Descriptive statistics and a narrative synthesis will be presented. Heterogeneity and sensitivity assessments will be conducted to aid interpretation of results. Ethics and dissemination The results of this review will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed scientific manuscript and at international scientific conferences. Results will inform quality improvement strategies, replication of identified good practices, potential policy changes, and future research. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016040053.

[1]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[2]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[3]  C. Harper,et al.  Why do women choose private over public facilities for family planning services? A qualitative study of post-partum women in an informal urban settlement in Kenya , 2015, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  C. B. Moore,et al.  Quality of Care and Service Expansion for HIV Care and Treatment , 2015, Current HIV/AIDS Reports.

[5]  Mayuri V Panditrao,et al.  Barriers associated with the utilization of continued care among HIV-infected women who had previously enrolled in a private sector PMTCT program in Maharashtra, India , 2015, AIDS care.

[6]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[8]  M. Clarke,et al.  Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance , 2014, BMJ Open.

[9]  M. Conlon,et al.  Public-private partnerships in the response to HIV: experience from the resource industry in Papua New Guinea. , 2014, Rural and remote health.

[10]  L. Hirschhorn,et al.  Patient satisfaction with HIV/AIDS care at private clinics in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 2014, AIDS care.

[11]  A. Mori,et al.  Stock-outs of antiretroviral drugs and coping strategies used to prevent changes in treatment regimens in Kinondoni District, Tanzania: a cross-sectional study , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice.

[12]  N. Ford,et al.  Role and outcomes of community health workers in HIV care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review , 2013, Journal of the International AIDS Society.

[13]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  S. Basu,et al.  Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[16]  R. Colebunders,et al.  Antiretroviral treatment in the private sector in Namibia , 2011, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[17]  R. Atun,et al.  Building a Durable Response to HIV/AIDS: Implications for Health Systems , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[18]  Pamela Rao,et al.  Leveraging the Private Health Sector to Enhance HIV Service Delivery in Lower-Income Countries , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[19]  A. Levin,et al.  Role of the private sector in the provision of immunization services in low- and middle-income countries. , 2011, Health policy and planning.

[20]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Quality of Private and Public Ambulatory Health Care in Low and Middle Income Countries: Systematic Review of Comparative Studies , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[21]  N. Ford,et al.  Providing universal access to antiretroviral therapy in Thyolo, Malawi through task shifting and decentralization of HIV/AIDS care , 2010, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[22]  F. Wabwire-mangen,et al.  Inadequate pre-antiretroviral care, stock-out of antiretroviral drugs and stigma: policy challenges/bottlenecks to the new WHO recommendations for earlier initiation of antiretroviral therapy (CD<350 cells/microL) in eastern Uganda. , 2010, Health policy.

[23]  N. Ford,et al.  A systematic review of task- shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa , 2010, Human resources for health.

[24]  W. El-Sadr,et al.  The Impact of HIV Scale-Up on Health Systems: A Priority Research Agenda , 2009, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[25]  A. Case,et al.  The Impact of the AIDS Pandemic on Health Services in Africa: Evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys , 2009, Demography.

[26]  M. Uplekar,et al.  Public-private mix for control of tuberculosis and TB-HIV in Nairobi, Kenya: outcomes, opportunities and obstacles. , 2008, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[27]  M. Oermann,et al.  Brief Reports for Disseminating Systematic Reviews to Nurses , 2006, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[28]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Health Systems and Access to Antiretroviral Drugs for HIV in Southern Africa: Service Delivery and Human Resources Challenges , 2006, Reproductive health matters.

[29]  M. Dibley,et al.  Comparative quality of private and public health services in rural Vietnam. , 2005, Health policy and planning.

[30]  L. Venter Firms fill antiretroviral gap in South Africa , 2005, The Lancet.

[31]  M. Eliasson [Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis]. , 2000, Lakartidningen.

[32]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study , 1997, BMJ.

[33]  M. Ijaiya,et al.  Knowledge and Practices of PMTCT among Health Care Providers in Private Hospital in Ilorin, Nigeria , 2014 .

[34]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[35]  Katja Jasinskaja,et al.  Elaboration and Explanation ⋆ , 2011 .