Micro-mechanical characterisation of the properties of primary tooth dentine.

OBJECTIVES Understanding the mechanical properties of dentine is of importance as adhesive restorative materials mainly achieve their bonding to the tooth structure through dentine. The current study measures the hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar dentine using an Ultra-Micro-Indentation System (UMIS), which allows the dentine to remain hydrated and thus is assumed to be closer to the in vivo conditions. METHODS Eight sound primary molar teeth were axially sectioned, embedded in resin and fine polished. Two linear arrays of indentations were done on coronal dentine, from the pulp wall to dentino-enamel junction (DEJ) parallel to the tubule direction under a force load of 25mN. RESULTS The mean hardness and elastic modulus of the dentine nearest the pulp wall was 0.52+/-0.24 and 11.59+/-3.95GPa, respectively, which was significantly lower than those of dentine in the middle area, which was 0.85+/-0.19 and 17.06+/-3.09GPa, respectively, and the dentine nearest DEJ, which was 0.91+/-0.15 and 16.33+/-3.83GPa, respectively. There is a statistically significant linear correlation between the hardness and modulus of elasticity. CONCLUSIONS The hardness and modulus of elasticity of dentine decreases with decreasing distance from the pulp. This is of importance to clinicians because an extension of cavity preparation towards the pulp may lead to less mechanical support for a restoration.

[1]  B. Lawn,et al.  Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science and Engineering , 1986 .

[2]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  Victor P. Totah.  Increase in Hardness of Dentin On Drying , 1942 .

[4]  D. Pashley,et al.  The relationship between dentin microhardness and tubule density. , 1985, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[5]  S. Bordin-Aykroyd,et al.  In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  L. Tam,et al.  Effect of dentine depth on the fracture toughness of dentine-composite adhesive interfaces. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  S. Rusby,et al.  Dentine bonding agents--characteristic bond strength as a function of dentine depth. , 1992, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  G W Marshall,et al.  Dentin: microstructure and characterization. , 1993, Quintessence international.

[9]  W. Geurtsen,et al.  Comparison of the number and diameter of dentinal tubules in human and bovine dentine by scanning electron microscopic investigation. , 2000, Archives of oral biology.

[10]  F. Salama,et al.  Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent teeth. , 1991, Pediatric dentistry.

[11]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dimensional changes of demineralized human dentine during preparation for scanning electron microscopy. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[12]  G W Marshall,et al.  A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentine. , 1999, Archives of oral biology.

[13]  A. Tatevossian,et al.  Dentine and dentine reactions in the oral cavity , 1989 .

[14]  S. Weiner,et al.  Strain-structure relations in human teeth using Moiré fringes. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J M ten Cate,et al.  Comparison of artificial caries-like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profiles. , 1983, Caries research.

[16]  S. Poolthong.  Determination Of The Mechanical Properties Of Enamel Dentine And Cementum By An Ultra Micro-Indentation System , 1998 .

[17]  G W Marshall,et al.  Dentin shear strength: effects of tubule orientation and intratooth location. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  J. T. ten Bosch,et al.  Demineralization and Remineralization Evaluation Techniques , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[19]  B. Lawn,et al.  Indentation of Brittle Materials , 1985 .

[20]  A Holt,et al.  The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  G W Marshall,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of demineralized human dentin measured in water with atomic force microscope (AFM)-based indentation. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  G W Marshall,et al.  Hardness and Young's modulus of human peritubular and intertubular dentine. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[23]  N Meredith,et al.  Measurement of the microhardness and Young's modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[24]  Jaroslav Menčík,et al.  Strength and fracture of glass and ceramics , 1992 .

[25]  M. Ashby,et al.  Engineering Materials 2: An Introduction to Microstructures, Processing and Design , 1986 .

[26]  G. Marshall,et al.  Microhardness of carious deciduous dentin. , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[27]  Donald R Uhlmann,et al.  Glass--science and technology , 1980 .

[28]  J. Avery.  Oral Development and Histology , 1994 .

[29]  G. Marshall,et al.  Nanomechanical Properties of Hydrated Carious Human Dentin , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[30]  D A Sumikawa,et al.  Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. , 1999, Pediatric dentistry.

[31]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.