Smart Monitoring of Userp s Health at Home: Performance Evaluation and Signal Processing of a Wearable Sensor for the Measurement of Heart Rate and Breathing Rate

Nowadays, the monitoring of users’ health status is possible by means of smart sensing devices at low-cost and with high measuring capabilities. Wearable devices are able to acquire multiple physiological and physical waveforms and are equipped with on-board algorithms to process these signals and extract the required quantities. However, the performance of such processing techniques should be evaluated and compared to different approaches, e.g. processing of the raw waveforms acquired. In this paper, the authors have performed a metrological characterization of a commercial wearable monitoring device for the continuous acquisition of physiological quantities (e.g. Heart Rate - HR and Breathing Rate - BR) and raw waveforms (e.g. Electrocardiogram - ECG). The aim of this work is to compare the performance of the on-board processing algorithms for the calculation of HR and BR with a novel approach applied to the raw signals. Results show that the HR values provided by the device are accurate enough (±2.1 and ±2.8 bpm in static and dynamic tests), without the need of additional processing. On the contrary, the implementation of the dedicated processing technique for breathing waveform allows to compute accurate BR values (±2.1 bpm with respect to standard equipment).

[1]  Andrew Six smith,et al.  Smart care technologies: Meeting whose needs? , 2000 .

[2]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[3]  Frans Leijten,et al.  Using photoplethysmography in heart rate monitoring of patients with epilepsy , 2015, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[4]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Automatic detection of onset and offset of QRS complexes independent of isoelectric segments , 2014 .

[5]  T. Watson,et al.  Field based reliability and validity of the bioharness™ multivariable monitoring device. , 2012, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[6]  Bala Srinivasan,et al.  Adaptive mobile activity recognition system with evolving data streams , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Giuseppe De Pietro,et al.  A supervised approach to automatically extract a set of rules to support fall detection in an mHealth system , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Cagatay Catal,et al.  On the use of ensemble of classifiers for accelerometer-based activity recognition , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[9]  Abhinav Parate,et al.  A remote wireless sensor network/electrocardiographic approach to discriminating cocaine use , 2015 .

[10]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Smart Home Sensors for the Elderly: A Model for Participatory Formative Evaluation , 2006 .

[11]  Duc A. Tran,et al.  The 11th International Conference on Mobile Systems and Pervasive Computing (MobiSPC-2014) A Study on Human Activity Recognition Using Accelerometer Data from Smartphones , 2014 .

[12]  Adrian Tarniceriu,et al.  Evaluation of the beat-to-beat detection accuracy of PulseOn wearable optical heart rate monitor , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[13]  K. Søgaard,et al.  Comparison of two systems for long-term heart rate variability monitoring in free-living conditions - a pilot study , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[14]  Talal K. Talal,et al.  Stressing the dressing: Assessing stress during wound care in real-time using wearable sensors , 2014 .

[15]  T. Watson,et al.  Bioharness(™) Multivariable Monitoring Device: Part. II: Reliability. , 2012, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[16]  Marten Haesner,et al.  Comparison of four different mobile devices for measuring heart rate and ECG with respect to aspects of usability and acceptance by older people. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Julio Abascal Ambient Intelligence for people with disabilities and elderly people , 2004 .

[18]  C. M. Pastre,et al.  Comparison of the Polar S810i monitor and the ECG for the analysis of heart rate variability in the time and frequency domains. , 2008, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[19]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Revitalizing a vital sign: improving detection of tachypnea at primary triage. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[20]  Gian Marco Revel,et al.  A novel approach for features extraction in physiological signals , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings.

[21]  J. Reginster,et al.  Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring , 2014, Archives of Public Health.

[22]  E. V. Runova,et al.  Monitoring and distant diagnostics of sportsmen's functional state based on information technologies and telemetry in the conditions of natural activity , 2012 .

[23]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Francesca Torti,et al.  FSDA: A MATLAB toolbox for robust analysis and interactive data exploration , 2012 .

[25]  Shane A Lowe,et al.  Monitoring human health behaviour in one's living environment: a technological review. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  C. Sweetlin Hemalatha,et al.  Conference on Ambient Systems , Networks and Technologies ( ANT 2013 ) Frequent Bit Pattern Mining Over Triaxial Accelerometer Data Streams For Recognizing Human Activities And Detecting Fall , 2013 .

[27]  Gerwyn Hughes,et al.  Bioharness(™) multivariable monitoring device: part. I: validity. , 2012, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[28]  A. Josko Discrete Wavelet Transform In Automatic ECG Signal Analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Technology Conference IMTC 2007.