Robust Partial Integrated Guidance and Control of Interceptors in Terminal Phase

Integrated guidance and control (IGC) algorithms proposed in the recent literature do not exploit the inherent time scale separation property that exists in aerospace vehicles between rotational and translational motions. Since the amount of body rates needed is explicitly not available in an IGC approach, the design tuning becomes very difficult. Consequently, unless the design is done in an extremely careful manner, this approach may lead to instability of rotational dynamics. To overcome this difficulty, a new time scale separated partial integrated guidance and control design is proposed in this paper. In this design, an outer loop optimal control formulation is solved in a computationally efficient manner using a recently-developed model predictive spread control philosophy. It directly generates the commanded pitch and yaw rates, from an outer loop (formulated in the framework of optimal control theory), whereas the commanded roll rate is generated from a roll stabilization loop. The inner loop tracks the outer loop commands using a nonlinear Dynamic inversion philosophy. In both the loops Six-degree of freedom (Six-DOF) interceptor model is used directly. This intelligent manipulation preserves the inherent time scale separation property between the translational and rotational dynamics, while preserving the benefits of the IGC philosophy. Comparative Six-DOF simulation studies of proposed partial integrated guidance and control (PIGC) scheme with an existing SDRE based one-loop IGC design as well as with a conventional three-loop design shows that the proposed PIGC scheme outperforms both of them. Moreover, to address the problem of modeling inaccuracy, a neuro-adaptive design is augmented to dynamic inversion technique in the inner loop. Numerical results indicate that the proposed approach leads to good performance robustness.

[1]  Moshe Idan,et al.  Sliding-Mode Control for Integrated Missile Autopilot Guidance , 2004 .

[2]  Ernest J. Ohlmeyer,et al.  Nonlinear integrated guidance-control laws for homing missiles , 2001 .

[3]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Structured model-following neuro-adaptive design for attitude maneuver of rigid bodies , 2009 .

[4]  Dan Bugajski,et al.  Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design , 1994 .

[5]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[6]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Model-following neuro-adaptive control design for non-square, non-affine nonlinear systems , 2007 .

[7]  Kendall E. Atkinson An introduction to numerical analysis , 1978 .

[8]  R. W. Illman,et al.  Missile Guidance and Control , 1953 .

[9]  E. J. Ohlmeyer,et al.  Integrated Design of Agile Missile Guidance and Autopilot Systems , 2001 .

[10]  Robert M. Sanner,et al.  Gaussian Networks for Direct Adaptive Control , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[11]  Arthur E. Bryson,et al.  Applied Optimal Control , 1969 .

[12]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Nonlinear flight control using neural networks , 1994 .

[13]  J. Junkins,et al.  Analytical Mechanics of Space Systems , 2003 .

[14]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF PILOT COMMANDS IN AIRCRAFT CONTROL: A NEW APPROACH BASED ON DYNAMIC INVERSION , 2003 .

[15]  S. N. Balakrishnan,et al.  Robust Neurocontrollers for Systems with Model Uncertainties: A Helicopter Application , 2005 .

[16]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Spread Acceleration Guidance for High Speed Targets , 2007 .

[17]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Spread Acceleration Guidance with Impact Angle Constraint for Stationary Targets , 2008 .

[18]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Model Predictive Static Programming: A Computationally Efficient Technique For Suboptimal Control Design , 2009 .

[19]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[20]  D. Ghose,et al.  A spreader acceleration guidance scheme for command guided surface-to-air missiles , 1989, Proceedings of the IEEE National Aerospace and Electronics Conference.

[21]  Ming Xin,et al.  Integrated Guidance and Control of Missiles with Θ-D Method , 2004 .

[22]  George M Siouris,et al.  Missile Guidance and Control Systems , 2004 .

[23]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Adaptive output feedback control of a class of non-linear systems using neural networks , 2001 .

[24]  Mangal Kothari,et al.  An optimal dynamic inversion-based neuro-adaptive approach for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..