A Myoelectric Computer Interface for Reducing Abnormal Muscle Activations after Spinal Cord Injury

Myoelectric Computer Interfaces (MCIs) are a viable option to promote the recovery of movements following spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, or other neurological disorders that impair motor functions. We developed and tested a MCI interface with the goal of reducing abnormal muscular activations due to compensatory strategies or undesired co-contraction after SCI. The interface mapped surface electromyographic signals (sEMG) into the movement of a cursor on a computer monitor. First, we aimed to reduce the co-activation of muscles pairs: the activation of two muscles controlled orthogonal directions of the cursor movements. Furthermore, to decrease the undesired concurrent activation of a third muscle, we modulated the visual feedback related to the position of the cursor on the screen based on the activation of this muscle. We tested the interface with six unimpaired and two SCI participants. Participants were able to decrease the activity of the targeted muscle when it was associated with the visual feedback of the cursor, but, interestingly, after training, its activity increased again. As for the SCI participants, one successfully decreased the co-activation of arm muscles, while the other successfully improved the selective activation of leg muscles. This is a first proof of concept that people with SCI can acquire, through the proposed MCI, a greater awareness of their muscular activity, reducing abnormal muscle simultaneous activations.

[1]  Le Li,et al.  Assistive Control System Using Continuous Myoelectric Signal in Robot-Aided Arm Training for Patients After Stroke , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  A. Hicks,et al.  Spasticity after spinal cord injury , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[3]  Oonagh M. Giggins,et al.  Biofeedback in rehabilitation , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Å. Seiger,et al.  Spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury: nature, severity, and location. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Marc W Slutzky,et al.  Reducing Abnormal Muscle Coactivation After Stroke Using a Myoelectric-Computer Interface , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  V. Dietz,et al.  Spastic movement disorder , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[7]  J. Desmedt,et al.  Spinal and supraspinal mechanisms of voluntary motor control and locomotion , 1980 .

[8]  James W. Lance,et al.  The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement , 1980, Neurology.

[9]  Eric Berton,et al.  Increased antagonist muscle activity in cervical SCI patients suggests altered reciprocal inhibition during elbow contractions , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[11]  B. Schmit,et al.  Extensor reflexes in human spinal cord injury: activation by hip proprioceptors , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  R. G. Lee,et al.  Reciprocal Ia inhibition in patients with asymmetric spinal spasticity , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  David W. Franklin,et al.  When Optimal Feedback Control Is Not Enough: Feedforward Strategies Are Required for Optimal Control with Active Sensing , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  C. Sherrington Flexion‐reflex of the limb, crossed extension‐reflex, and reflex stepping and standing , 1910, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Dalia De Santis,et al.  Designing Visual Feedback to Reshape Muscle Coordination , 2018, Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation III.