Optimal distributed control with application to asymmetric vehicle platoons

This paper considers a distributed system of identical agents with arbitrary LTI models. A method for distributed state-feedback design is provided. The proposed solution consists of two steps: first a single-agent controller is derived and then, based on the network topology, the gain of this controller is adjusted. LQ optimality of this controller is proved provided that the Laplacian has only real eigenvalues and is non-defective. The result is subsequently used to design a controller for asymmetric vehicle platoon. We show that the same controller with a fixed gain is the optimal controller for any number of vehicles in the platoon. However, the performance of the optimal controller is still subject to inherent limitations given by the network topology. In some cases, even exponential scaling in the number of vehicles must occur for any controller.

[1]  Dan Martinec,et al.  Scaling in Bidirectional Platoons With Dynamic Controllers and Proportional Asymmetry , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Mihailo R. Jovanovic.  On the optimality of localised distributed controllers , 2010 .

[3]  Peter Seiler,et al.  Disturbance propagation in vehicle strings , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Prabir Barooah,et al.  Stability and robustness of large platoons of vehicles with double‐integrator models and nearest neighbor interaction , 2013 .

[5]  Wei Ren,et al.  Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols , 2011, Autom..

[6]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Cooperative Optimal Control for Multi-Agent Systems on Directed Graph Topologies , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Prabir Barooah,et al.  On Achieving Size-Independent Stability Margin of Vehicular Lattice Formations With Distributed Control , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Guanghui Wen,et al.  Designing Fully Distributed Consensus Protocols for Linear Multi-Agent Systems With Directed Graphs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  INFORMATION FLOW AND COOPERATIVE CONTROL OF VEHICLE FORMATIONS , 2002 .

[10]  Dan Martinec,et al.  Transfer functions in consensus systems with higher-order dynamics and external inputs , 2015, ArXiv.

[11]  Z. Qu,et al.  Cooperative Control of Dynamical Systems: Applications to Autonomous Vehicles , 2009 .

[12]  Lin Huang,et al.  Consensus of Multiagent Systems and Synchronization of Complex Networks: A Unified Viewpoint , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[13]  Shaun M. Fallat,et al.  Totally Nonnegative Matrices , 2011 .

[14]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  Mistuning-Based Control Design to Improve Closed-Loop Stability Margin of Vehicular Platoons , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Jan Lunze,et al.  Synchronization of Heterogeneous Agents , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  A. Olvera,et al.  Spatial instabilities and size limitations of flocks , 2007, Networks Heterog. Media.

[17]  Dan Martinec,et al.  Nonzero Bound on Fiedler Eigenvalue Causes Exponential Growth of H-Infinity Norm of Vehicular Platoon , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[19]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Optimal Design for Synchronization of Cooperative Systems: State Feedback, Observer and Output Feedback , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Zhisheng Duan,et al.  On H∞ and H2 performance regions of multi-agent systems , 2011, Autom..

[21]  Dan Martinec,et al.  Transients of platoons with asymmetric and different Laplacians , 2015, Syst. Control. Lett..

[22]  J. J. P. Veerman,et al.  Asymmetric Decentralized Flocks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[23]  Z. Duan,et al.  On H ∞ and H 2 performance regions of multi-agent systems ✩ , 2011 .