Do ‘liberal market economies’ really innovate more radically than ‘coordinated market economies’?: Hall and Soskice reconsidered

In Varieties of Capitalism; The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Peter A. Hall and David Soskice (H&S) argue that technological specialization patterns are largely determined by the prevailing "variety of capitalism". They hypothesize that "liberal market economies" (LMEs) specialize in radical innovation, while "coordinated market economies" (CMEs) focus more on incremental innovation. Mark Zachary Taylor [Taylor, M.Z., 2004. Empirical evidence against varieties of capitalism's theory of technological innovation. International Organization 58, 601-631.] convincingly argued that Hall and Soskice's empirical test is fundamentally flawed and proposed a more appropriate test of their conjecture. He rejected the varieties of capitalism explanation of innovation patterns. We extend and refine Taylor's analysis, using a broader set of radicality indicators and making industry-level comparisons. Our results indicate that Hall and Soskice's conjecture cannot be upheld as a general rule, but that it survives closer scrutiny for a substantial number of industries and an important dimension of radicality.

[1]  M. Timmer.  On the Reliability of Unit Value Ratios in International Comparisons , 1996 .

[2]  Nanno Mulder,et al.  Transport and Communications Output and Productivity in Brazil and the USA, 1950-1990 , 1995 .

[3]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[4]  Robert J. Hill,et al.  Constructing Price Indexes across Space and Time: The Case of the European Union , 2004 .

[5]  A. Maddison.  Economic Growth and Standards of Living in the Twentieth Century , 1994 .

[6]  R. Hill,et al.  Standard Errors as Weights in Multilateral Price Indexes , 2006 .

[7]  D. Pilat.  The economics of catch up : the experience of Japan and Korea , 1993 .

[8]  P. Groote,et al.  Output responses to infrastructure investment in the Netherlands, 1850-1913 , 1995 .

[9]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance , 2007 .

[10]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[11]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[12]  Pat Hall,et al.  Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Vol. 8): Wiley Online Library. , 2001 .

[13]  B. Ark,et al.  The Delta-Model Revisited: Recent trends in the structural performance of the Dutch economy , 2000 .

[14]  Enrico Santarelli,et al.  Patents and the Geographic Localization of R&D Spillovers in French Manufacturing , 2001 .

[15]  A. Szirmai,et al.  Zambian manufacturing performance in comparative perspective , 2002 .

[16]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[17]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[18]  David Soskice,et al.  An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[19]  Sungchang Jung,et al.  The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case study of patent statistics , 2002 .

[20]  M. Caniels.  Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth , 2000 .

[21]  A. Agresti,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis , 1991, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[22]  R. Fremdling.  European Railways 1825-2001, an Overview , 2003 .

[23]  A. Hofman.  Latin American economic development.: A causal analysis in historical perspective , 1998 .

[24]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks , 2005 .

[25]  Historical Precedents of Global Markets , 1999 .

[26]  P. Groote,et al.  Can growth theory contribute to our understanding of nineteenth century economic dynamics , 1994 .

[27]  P. Groote,et al.  A standardised time series of the stock of fixed capital in the Netherlands, 1900-1995 , 1996 .

[28]  A. Erumban,et al.  Lifetimes of Machinery and Equipment. Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2006 .

[29]  C. Castaldi,et al.  The Properties of Sectoral Growth : Evidence from Four Large European Economies , 2006 .

[30]  H. D. Jong,et al.  Comparative productivity and structural change in Belgian and Dutch manufacturing: 1936-1987 , 1997 .

[31]  N. Mulder,et al.  The International Comparison of Performance in Distribution: Value Added, Labour Productivity and PPPs in Mexican and US Wholesale and Retail Trade 1975/7 , 1993 .

[32]  A. Szirmai,et al.  Growth and Divergence in Manufacturing Performance in South and East Asia , 1997 .

[33]  Bhapkar Vp,et al.  On the analysis of contingency tables with a quantitative response. , 1968 .

[34]  R. Fremdling.  Foreign trade-transfer-adaptation: the British iron making technology on the continent (Belgium and France) , 2002 .

[35]  S. Breschi,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis , 2000 .

[36]  B. Ark,et al.  Comparative Productivity in East and West German Manufacturing before Reunification , 1993 .

[37]  P. V. Mulligen.  Alternative price indices for computers in the Netherlands using scanner data , 2003 .

[38]  G. Jong.  Canada's Post-War Manufacturing Performance: A Comparison with the United States , 1996 .

[39]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[40]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  The Impact of Computers on Productivity in the Trade Sector: Explorations with Dutch Microdata , 1999 .

[41]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  The role of human resource management in cross-border mergers and acquisitions , 2004 .

[42]  B. Ark,et al.  New estimates of labour productivity in the manufacturing sectors of Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland , 2002 .

[43]  Andrew Griffiths,et al.  Institutional Governance Systems And Variations In National Competitive Advantage: An Integrative Framework , 2005 .

[44]  B. Ark,et al.  The Canada-U.S. manufacturing productivity gap revisited: new ICOP results , 2002 .

[45]  Bart van Ark,et al.  "Changing gear": productivity, ICT and services: Europe and the United States , 2002 .

[46]  Martin Rhodes,et al.  EMU and Labor Market Institutions in Europe , 2005 .

[47]  Bart van Ark,et al.  Does the European Union need to revive productivity growth , 2005 .

[48]  H. D. Jong,et al.  Industrial output and labour productivity in the Netherlands, 1913-1929: some neglected issues , 1994 .

[49]  M. Taylor.  Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation , 2004, International Organization.

[50]  Harald Edquist,et al.  The Swedish ICT miracle - myth or reality? , 2004, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[51]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[52]  N. Mulder.  Output and Productivity in Brazilian Distribution : A Comparative View , 1994 .

[53]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Technology Spillovers between Sectors and over Time. , 1999 .

[54]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  ICT and Europe's Productivity Performance: Industry-Level Growth Account Comparisons with the United States , 2005 .

[55]  R. Fremdling.  Anglo-German rivalry on coal markets in France, the Netherlands and Germany, 1850-1913 , 1995 .

[56]  Gjalt de Jong,et al.  Innovation in services: overview of data sources and analytical structures , 1999 .

[57]  Peter Vikström.  Long term patterns in Swedish growth and structural change, 1870-1990 , 2001 .

[58]  Bart van Ark,et al.  Catching up or getting stuck? Europe's troubles to exploit ICT's productivity potential , 2006 .

[59]  L. Kenworthy.  Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance , 2006 .

[60]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Uncertainty and the size distribution of rewards from innovation , 2000 .

[61]  M. Timmer,et al.  Productivity Levels in Distributive Trades: A New ICOP Dataset for OECD Countries , 2006 .

[62]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[63]  M. Timmer,et al.  Manufacturing Performance in Indonesia, South Korea and Taiwan before and after the Crisis. An international Perspective, 1980-2000 , 2003 .

[64]  Carolina Castaldi,et al.  The identification of important innovations using tail estimators , 2008 .

[65]  Bart Los,et al.  International convergence and divergence of material input structures: an industry-level perspective , 2009 .

[66]  M. Kitson.  The American Economic Model and European Economic Policy , 2005 .

[67]  Bart van Ark,et al.  ICT investments and growth accounts for the European Union , 2002 .

[68]  J. Sleifer.  A benchmark comparison of East and West German industrial labour productivity in 1954 , 2002 .

[69]  N. Mulder.  New Perspectives on Service Output and Productivity: A Comparison of French and US Productivity in Transport, Communications Wholesale and Retail Trade , 1994 .

[70]  G. Jong.  An International Comparison of Real Output and Labour Productivity in Manufacturing in Ecuador and the United States , 1994 .

[71]  Measuring and Analysing Educational Inequality: The Distribution of Grade Enrolment Rates in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa , 2006 .

[72]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[73]  Rainer Fremdling.  The German Industrial Census of 1936. Statistics as Preparation for the War , 2003 .

[74]  Bart van Ark,et al.  Three phases of Dutch economic growth and technological change, 1815-1997 , 1999 .

[75]  Ben Gales.  In Foreign Parts : Free-Standing Companies in the Netherlands around the First World War , 1994 .

[76]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[77]  Steven Casper,et al.  NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORKS AND THE HYBRIDIZATION OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS MODELS: THE GERMAN AND UK BIOTECHNOLOGY SECTORS , 2001 .

[78]  A. Maddison,et al.  An International Comparison of Real Output, Purchasing Power and Labour Productivity in Manufacturing Industries: Brazil, Mexico and the USA in 1975 , 1994 .

[79]  Ronald M. Albers.  Human Capital and Economic Growth: Operationalising Growth Theory, with Special Reference to the Netherlands in the 19th Century" , 1997 .

[80]  Capitalism vs. Capitalism: How America's Obsession with Individual Achievement and Short-Term Profit Has Led It to the Brink of Collapse , 1993 .

[81]  The productivity problem of the Dutch economy: Implications for economic and social policies and business strategy , 2003 .

[82]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[83]  Prices, Real Value Added and Productivity in Dutch Manufacturing, 1921-1960 , 1993 .

[84]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[85]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data , 1992 .

[86]  A. Stel,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[87]  V. Tassenaar.  Regional differences in standard of living in the Netherlands, 1800-1875: a study based on anthropometric data , 1995 .

[88]  V. P. Bhapkar,et al.  On the analysis of contingency tables with a quantitative response. , 1968, Biometrics.

[89]  Angus Maddison,et al.  The international comparison of real product and productivity , 1994 .

[90]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  Mind the Gap! International Comparisons of Productivity in Services and Goods Production , 2007 .

[91]  M. Timmer.  Catch Up Patterns in Newly Industrializing Countries. An International Comparison of Manufacturing Productivity in Taiwan , 1998 .

[92]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[93]  Harry X. Wu.  Comparative labour productivity performance in Chinese manufacturing, 1952-1997 : an ICOP PPP approach , 2001 .

[94]  N. Mulder.  Transport and Communication in Mexico and the United States: Value Added, Purchasing Power Parities and Productivity , 1994 .

[95]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[96]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[97]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[98]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[99]  N. Mulder,et al.  Brazil and Mexico's manufacturing performance in international perspective, 1970-1998 , 2002 .

[100]  E. Frankema.  The Colonial Origins of Inequality: Exploring the Causes and Consequences of Land Distribution , 2006 .

[101]  Harry X. Wu,et al.  "Losing ground" : Japanese labour productivity and unit laboour cost manufacturing in comparison to the U.S. , 2003 .

[102]  Marcel P. Timmer,et al.  The 'appropriate technology' explanation of productivity growth differentials: an empirical approach , 2005 .

[103]  R. Inklaar.  Cyclical Productivity in Europe and the United States: Evaluating the Evidence on Returns to Scale and Input Utilization , 2006 .

[104]  Productivity in French manufacturing: an international comparative perspective , 1994 .