Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity

Explaining the maintenance of high local species diversity in communities governed by competition for space has been a long‐standing problem in ecology. We present a simple theoretical model to explore the influence of immigration from an external source on local coexistence, species abundance patterns, and ecosystem processes in plant communities. The model is built after classical metapopulation models but is applied to competition for space between individuals and includes immigration by a propagule rain and an extinction threshold for rare species. Our model shows that immigration can have a huge effect on local species diversity in competitive communities where competition for space would lead to the exclusion of all but one species if the community were closed. Local species richness is expected to increase strongly when immigration intensity increases beyond the threshold required for the successful establishment of one or a few individuals. Community structure and species relative abundances are also expected to change markedly with immigration intensity. Increasing immigration causes total space occupation by the community to increase but primary productivity on average to either decrease or stay constant with increasing diversity, depending on the relation between immigration and local reproduction rates. These results stress the need for a regional perspective to understand the processes that determine species diversity, species abundance patterns, and ecosystem functioning in local communities.

[1]  R. Kadmon,et al.  Spatiotemporal Demographic Processes in Plant Populations: An Approach and a Case Study , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[2]  James B. Grace,et al.  A Structural Equation Model of Plant Species Richness and Its Application to a Coastal Wetland , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[4]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[5]  S. Fomin.  [Some mathematical problems of biology]. , 1970, Biofizika.

[6]  T. Fagerström,et al.  Competition and coexistence in plant communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  James B. Grace,et al.  The relationship between species richness and community biomass: the importance of environmental variables. , 1994 .

[8]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Ecosystem development explained by competition within and between material cycles , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  A Hierarchical Analysis of Species' Abundance Patterns in Grassland Vegetation , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[10]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in Patchy Environment , 1983 .

[12]  Nicholas J. Gotelli,et al.  Metapopulation Models: The Rescue Effect, the Propagule Rain, and the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[13]  J. Lawton,et al.  Insect Herbivores on Bracken Do Not Support the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[14]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[15]  The Effects of Variability on Metapopulation Dynamics and Rates of Invasion , 1994 .

[16]  D. Tilman.  On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority , 1987 .

[17]  P. Chesson,et al.  The Roles of Harsh and Fluctuating Conditions in the Dynamics of Ecological Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[18]  James S. Clark,et al.  STAGES AND SPATIAL SCALES OF RECRUITMENT LIMITATION IN SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN FORESTS , 1998 .

[19]  A. Shmida,et al.  Biological determinants of species diversity , 1985 .

[20]  M. Zobel.  Plant species coexistence - the role of historical, evolutionary and ecological factors , 1992 .

[21]  R. Levins,et al.  Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  H. Cornell,et al.  11. Local and Regional Processes as Controls of Species Richness , 1998 .

[23]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Light-Gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest , 1999, Science.

[24]  D. Schluter,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL AND REGIONAL DIVERSITY , 1997 .

[25]  A. Hastings.  Disturbance, coexistence, history, and competition for space , 1980 .

[26]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[27]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[28]  P. Keddy.  EXPERIMENTAL DEMOGRAPHY OF THE SAND-DUNE ANNUAL, CAKILE EDENTULA, GROWING ALONG AN ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT IN NOVA SCOTIA , 1981 .

[29]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[30]  D. Phillips,et al.  Seed Availability and Biotic Interactions in Granite Outcrop Plant Communities , 1989 .

[31]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Biodiversity and the productivity and stability of ecosystems. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species Hypothesis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[33]  R. Levins.  Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[34]  B. A. Maurer.  The relationship between distribution and abundance in a patchy environment , 1990 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Competition among Fugitive Species in a Harlequin Environment , 1972 .

[36]  R. May,et al.  Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts , 1991 .

[37]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives.Robert E. Ricklefs , Dolph Schluter , 1995 .

[38]  M. Loreau.  Ground beetles in a changing environment: determinants of species diversity and community assembly , 1994 .

[39]  T. Schoener.  Rate of species turnover decreases from lower to higher organisms: a review of the data , 1983 .

[40]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[41]  Martin Zobel,et al.  Species pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration. , 1998 .

[42]  P. Sale.  Maintenance of High Diversity in Coral Reef Fish Communities , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Martin T. Sykes,et al.  Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. , 1993 .

[44]  N. Gotelli,et al.  A general model of metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[45]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Interspecific competition among metapopulations with space-limited subpopulations , 1986 .

[46]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[47]  R. Vance.  Interference Competition and the Coexistence of Two Competitors on a Single Limiting Resource , 1984 .

[48]  Andrew D. Taylor,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Metapopulation Dynamics , 1997 .

[49]  David Tilman,et al.  COMMUNITY INVASIBILITY, RECRUITMENT LIMITATION, AND GRASSLAND BIODIVERSITY , 1997 .

[50]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[52]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities , 1974, Science.

[54]  J. Lawton,et al.  Species interactions, local and regional processes, and limits to the richness of ecological communities : a theoretical perspective , 1992 .

[55]  N. Gotelli,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Tallgrass Prairie Plants: A Test of the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[56]  M. Westoby,et al.  Population dynamics in sessile organisms: some general results from three seemingly different theory-lineages , 1997 .

[57]  Johan A. J. Metz,et al.  Linking local and regional dynamics in stochastic metapopulation models , 1991 .

[58]  R. May,et al.  Two-Species Metapopulation Models , 1997 .

[59]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[60]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  Competition and Regional Coexistence , 1974 .

[61]  Robert M. May,et al.  Dynamics of metapopulations : habitat destruction and competitive coexistence , 1992 .

[62]  A. Shmida,et al.  Spatial scale and the determinants of plant species richness. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  The Husting Dilemma: A Methodological Note , 1987 .

[64]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with Plants , 1992, The American Naturalist.