Dustiness and Deagglomeration Testing: Interlaboratory Comparison of Systems for Nanoparticle Powders

Different types of aerosolization and deagglomeration testing systems exist for studying the properties of nanomaterial powders and their aerosols. However, results are dependent on the specific methods used. In order to have well-characterized aerosols, we require a better understanding of how system parameters and testing conditions influence the properties of the aerosols generated. In the present study, four experimental setups delivering different aerosolization energies were used to test the resultant aerosols of two distinct nanomaterials (hydrophobic and hydrophilic TiO2). The reproducibility of results within each system was good. However, the number concentrations and size distributions of the aerosols created varied across the four systems; for number concentrations, e.g., from 103 to 106 #/cm3. Moreover, distinct differences were also observed between the two materials with different surface coatings. The article discusses how system characteristics and other pertinent conditions modify the test results. We propose using air velocity as a suitable proxy for estimating energy input levels in aerosolization systems. The information derived from this work will be especially useful for establishing standard operating procedures for testing nanopowders, as well as for estimating their release rates under different energy input conditions, which is relevant for occupational exposure. Copyright © 2015 American Association for Aerosol Research

[1]  T. Inamuro,et al.  Numerical simulation of the dispersion of aggregated Brownian particles under shear flows , 2013 .

[2]  D. Leith,et al.  Dust Generation from Handling Powders in Industry , 1995 .

[3]  M. L. Laucks Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[4]  J. Israelachvili Chapter 13 – Van der Waals Forces between Particles and Surfaces , 2011 .

[5]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Investigation of airborne nanopowder agglomerate stability in an orifice under various differential pressure conditions , 2009 .

[6]  Marianne Geiser,et al.  Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[7]  Lennart Bergström,et al.  Hamaker constants of inorganic materials , 1997 .

[8]  Jose Manuel Valverde,et al.  Fluidization of nanopowders: a review , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[9]  S. Batsanov,et al.  Van der Waals Radii of Elements , 2001 .

[10]  David Leith,et al.  Method to evaluate the dustiness of pharmaceutical powders. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  Ana-Irina Stan,et al.  Laser synthesized nanopowders for polymer-based composites , 2012 .

[13]  A. Miszczyk,et al.  Improvement of electrochemical action of zinc-rich paints by addition of nanoparticulate zinc , 2013 .

[14]  M. Sumption,et al.  Chemical synthesis of superconducting MgB2 nanopowder , 2015 .

[15]  Jacob N. Israelachvili,et al.  Van der Waals Forces between Particles and Surfaces , 2011 .

[16]  M. Riediker,et al.  A system to assess the stability of airborne nanoparticle agglomerates under aerodynamic shear , 2015 .

[17]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Emission measurement and safety assessment for the production process of silicon nanoparticles in a pilot-scale facility , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[18]  Martin Morgeneyer,et al.  Experimental study of the aerosolization of fine alumina particles from bulk by a vortex shaker , 2013 .

[19]  Jinshun Zhao,et al.  Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data , 2013, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[20]  A Guidebook to Particle Size Analysis , 2022 .

[21]  Peng-Chi Tsai,et al.  Dustiness test of nanopowders using a standard rotating drum with a modified sampling train , 2009 .

[22]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles to the Brain , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[23]  H Fissan,et al.  Particle Characteristics in the Reactor and Pelletizing Areas of Carbon Black Production , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[24]  N. Fatah,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND FLUIDIZATION OF THE COHESIVE POWDERS: AGGLOMERATES SIZES APPROACH , 2008 .

[25]  D. Dahmann,et al.  Determination of dustiness of nanostructured materials , 2011 .

[26]  Chao Zhu,et al.  Gas fluidization characteristics of nanoparticle agglomerates , 2005 .

[27]  O. Stonkus,et al.  Study of cupric oxide nanopowders as efficient catalysts for low-temperature CO oxidation , 2013 .

[28]  H. C. Hamaker The London—van der Waals attraction between spherical particles , 1937 .

[29]  Cotogno Giulio,et al.  Titanium Dioxide, NM-100, NM-101, NM-102, NM-103, NM-104, NM-105: Characterisation and Physico-Chemical Properties , 2014 .

[30]  Berend van Wachem,et al.  EXPERIMENTS AND MODELLING OF MICRO-JET ASSISTED FLUIDIZATION OF NANOPARTICLES , 2010 .

[31]  I. Zālīte,et al.  SiAlON ceramics from nanopowders , 2008 .

[32]  P. Baron,et al.  Exposure to Carbon Nanotube Material: Aerosol Release During the Handling of Unrefined Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[33]  R. Brach,et al.  Surface roughness effects onmicroparticle adhesion , 2002 .

[34]  Masashi Gamo,et al.  Dustiness testing of engineered nanomaterials , 2009 .

[35]  J. Isaacs,et al.  Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods , 2009 .

[36]  Y. Pourcelot,et al.  Particle-size distribution of a powder : comparison of three analytical techniques , 1996 .