Inherited functional variants of the lymphocyte receptor CD5 influence melanoma survival

Despite the recent progress in treatment options, malignant melanoma remains a deadly disease. Besides therapy, inherited factors might modulate clinical outcome, explaining in part widely varying survival rates. T‐cell effector function regulators on antitumor immune responses could also influence survival. CD5, a T‐cell receptor inhibitory molecule, contributes to the modulation of antimelanoma immune responses as deduced from genetically modified mouse models. The CD5 SNPs rs2241002 (NM_014207.3:c.671C > T, p.Pro224Leu) and rs2229177 (NM_014207.3:c.1412C > T, p.Ala471Val) constitute an ancestral haplotype (Pro224‐Ala471) that confers T‐cell hyper‐responsiveness and worsens clinical autoimmune outcome. The assessment of these SNPs on survival impact from two melanoma patient cohorts (Barcelona, N = 493 and Essen, N = 215) reveals that p.Ala471 correlates with a better outcome (OR= 0.57, 95% CI = 0.33–0.99, Adj. p = 0.043, in Barcelona OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.40–1.01, Adj. p = 0.051, in Essen). While, p.Leu224 was associated with increased melanoma‐associated mortality in both cohorts (OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.07–3.24, Adj. p = 0.030 in Barcelona and OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.04–3.26, Adj. p = 0.037, in Essen). Furthermore survival analyses showed that the Pro224‐Ala471 haplotype in homozygosis improved melanoma survival in the entire set of patients (HR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.67, Adj. p = 0.005). These findings highlight the relevance of genetic variability in immune‐related genes for clinical outcome in melanoma.

[1]  E. Campo,et al.  Impact of the functional CD5 polymorphism A471V on the response of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia to conventional chemotherapy regimens , 2017, British journal of haematology.

[2]  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: New Insights and Current Place in Cancer Therapy , 2015, Pharmacotherapy.

[3]  I. Márquez-Rodas,et al.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors: therapeutic advances in melanoma. , 2015, Annals of translational medicine.

[4]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Genetic variants in Hippo pathway genes YAP1, TEAD1 and TEAD4 are associated with melanoma‐specific survival , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Functional Variants in Notch Pathway Genes NCOR2, NCSTN, and MAML2 Predict Survival of Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma , 2015, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[6]  T. Kirchhoff,et al.  Genetic associations of the interleukin locus at 1q32.1 with clinical outcomes of cutaneous melanoma , 2015, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[7]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Genetic variants in Fanconi Anemia Pathway Genes BRCA2 and FANCA Predict Melanoma Survival , 2014, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[8]  A. Sarukhan,et al.  CD5 as a Target for Immune-Based Therapies. , 2015, Critical reviews in immunology.

[9]  Javier Martín,et al.  Analysis of Ancestral and Functionally Relevant CD5 Variants in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  Dirk Schadendorf,et al.  Inherited variation in the PARP1 gene and survival from melanoma , 2014, International journal of cancer.

[11]  J. Alberola-Ila,et al.  Transgenic Expression of Soluble Human CD5 Enhances Experimentally-Induced Autoimmune and Anti-Tumoral Immune Responses , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  S. Puig,et al.  Capturing the biological impact of CDKN2A and MC1R genes as an early predisposing event in melanoma and non melanoma skin cancer , 2013, Oncotarget.

[13]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  An inherited variant in the gene coding for vitamin D-binding protein and survival from cutaneous melanoma: a BioGenoMEL study , 2013, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[14]  S. Rosso,et al.  Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte grade in primary melanomas is independently associated with melanoma-specific survival in the population-based genes, environment and melanoma study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Gene Variants in Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis and Cutaneous Melanoma Progression , 2013, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  F. Mami-Chouaib,et al.  T-cell modulatory properties of CD5 and its role in antitumor immune responses , 2013, Oncoimmunology.

[17]  Jeffrey E. Lee,et al.  Polymorphisms of Nucleotide Excision Repair Genes Predict Melanoma Survival , 2012, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Inherited variants in the MC1R gene and survival from cutaneous melanoma: a BioGenoMEL study , 2012, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[19]  J. Engelken,et al.  Evolutionary and functional evidence for positive selection at the human CD5 immune receptor gene. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  G. Schackert,et al.  Tumor Evasion from T Cell Surveillance , 2011, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[21]  Sarah-Jane Schramm,et al.  Melanoma Prognosis: A REMARK-Based Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis of Immunohistochemical and Gene Microarray Studies , 2011, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[22]  C. Raman,et al.  The immunomodulatory properties of the CD5 lymphocyte receptor in health and disease. , 2011, Current opinion in immunology.

[23]  Jeffrey E Gershenwald,et al.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Joan Valls,et al.  SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies , 2006, Bioinform..

[25]  A. Trautmann,et al.  CD5 Inhibits Signaling at the Immunological Synapse Without Impairing Its Formation 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[26]  S. Bondada,et al.  CD5-Mediated Negative Regulation of Antigen Receptor-Induced Growth Signals in B-1 B Cells , 1996, Science.

[27]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  A role for CD5 in TCR-mediated signal transduction and thymocyte selection. , 1995, Science.

[28]  N. Hollander Immunotherapy of lymphoid and nonlymphoid tumors with monoclonal anti-Lyt-1 antibodies. , 1984, Journal of immunology.