Validation of a new grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for dose calculation in radiotherapy with photon beams

A new grid-based Boltzmann equation solver, Acuros, was developed specifically for performing accurate and rapid radiotherapy dose calculations. In this study we benchmarked its performance against Monte Carlo for 6 and 18 MV photon beams in heterogeneous media. Acuros solves the coupled Boltzmann transport equations for neutral and charged particles on a locally adaptive Cartesian grid. The Acuros solver is an optimized rewrite of the general purpose Attila software, and for comparable accuracy levels, it is roughly an order of magnitude faster than Attila. Comparisons were made between Monte Carlo (EGSnrc) and Acuros for 6 and 18 MV photon beams impinging on a slab phantom comprising tissue, bone and lung materials. To provide an accurate reference solution, Monte Carlo simulations were run to a tight statistical uncertainty (sigma approximately 0.1%) and fine resolution (1-2 mm). Acuros results were output on a 2 mm cubic voxel grid encompassing the entire phantom. Comparisons were also made for a breast treatment plan on an anthropomorphic phantom. For the slab phantom in regions where the dose exceeded 10% of the maximum dose, agreement between Acuros and Monte Carlo was within 2% of the local dose or 1 mm distance to agreement. For the breast case, agreement was within 2% of local dose or 2 mm distance to agreement in 99.9% of voxels where the dose exceeded 10% of the prescription dose. Elsewhere, in low dose regions, agreement for all cases was within 1% of the maximum dose. Since all Acuros calculations required less than 5 min on a dual-core two-processor workstation, it is efficient enough for routine clinical use. Additionally, since Acuros calculation times are only weakly dependent on the number of beams, Acuros may ideally be suited to arc therapies, where current clinical algorithms may incur long calculation times.

[1]  D. Nigg Methods for radiation dose distribution analysis and treatment planning in boron neutron capture therapy. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Questions for comparison of clinical Monte Carlo codes , 2000 .

[3]  N Reynaert,et al.  Experimental verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available treatment planning systems , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  G. J. Storr Assessment of ideal neutron beams for neutron capture therapy. , 1992, Radiation research.

[5]  D W Nigg,et al.  Demonstration of three-dimensional deterministic radiation transport theory dose distribution analysis for boron neutron capture therapy. , 1991, Medical physics.

[6]  John McGhee,et al.  Radiative transport in fluorescence-enhanced frequency domain photon migration. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Jim E. Morel,et al.  A Hybrid Collocation-Galerkin-Sn Method for Solving the Boltzmann Transport Equation , 1989 .

[8]  Wayne Arter,et al.  Radiation transport analyses for IFMIF design by the Attila software using a Monte-Carlo source model , 2009 .

[9]  John McGhee,et al.  Radiative transport-based frequency-domain fluorescence tomography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  C. R. Drumm,et al.  Multidimensional electron-photon transport with standard discrete ordinates codes , 1995 .

[11]  R. Mohan,et al.  The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  E. Lewis,et al.  Computational Methods of Neutron Transport , 1993 .

[13]  A. Boyer,et al.  Tissue Inhomogeneity Corrections for Megavoltage Photon Beams , 2004 .

[14]  R. Mohan,et al.  Determining the incident electron fluence for Monte Carlo-based photon treatment planning using a standard measured data set. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  Michael J Price,et al.  Optimization of deterministic transport parameters for the calculation of the dose distribution around a high dose-rate 192Ir brachytherapy source. , 2008, Medical physics.

[16]  E. Heath,et al.  IMRT head and neck treatment planning with a commercially available Monte Carlo based planning system , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Firas Mourtada,et al.  Comparison of a finite-element multigroup discrete-ordinates code with Monte Carlo for radiotherapy calculations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  H. Neuenschwander,et al.  A macro Monte Carlo method for electron beam dose calculations , 1992 .

[19]  C. Ma,et al.  Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancer , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  T. Krieger,et al.  Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  E. Hussein,et al.  Determination of beam orientation in radiotherapy planning. , 1994, Medical physics.

[22]  T Knöös,et al.  Limitations of a pencil beam approach to photon dose calculations in lung tissue. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  J. Sempau,et al.  DPM, a fast, accurate Monte Carlo code optimized for photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculations , 2000 .

[24]  M. Alber,et al.  Monte Carlo dose computation for IMRT optimization* , 2000 .

[25]  Helen H Liu,et al.  Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. , 2007, Medical physics.

[26]  M. Fippel Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm. , 1999, Medical physics.

[27]  R. Mohan,et al.  Reference photon dosimetry data and reference phase space data for the 6 MV photon beam from varian clinac 2100 series linear accelerators. , 2004, Medical physics.

[28]  M. Tomsej,et al.  Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams , 2007 .

[29]  D. Rogers,et al.  Two-Dimensional Discrete Ordinates Photon Transport Calculations for Brachytherapy Dosimetry Applications , 2000 .

[30]  Shawn D. Pautz,et al.  Discontinuous Finite Element SN Methods on Three-Dimensional Unstructured Grids , 2001 .

[31]  I. Kawrakow VMC++, Electron and Photon Monte Carlo Calculations Optimized for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2001 .

[32]  N. Hertel,et al.  The use of neutron and gamma ray spectral measurements and calculations to obtain dosimetric information for DT neutrons. , 1983, Medical physics.

[33]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Monte Carlo study of photon fields from a flattening filter-free clinical accelerator. , 2006, Medical physics.

[34]  J. Moran,et al.  Macroscopic geometric heterogeneity effects in radiation dose distribution analysis for boron neutron capture therapy. , 1992, Medical physics.

[35]  F. Mourtada,et al.  Feasibility of a multigroup deterministic solution method for three-dimensional radiotherapy dose calculations. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Deterministic photon kerma distribution based on the Boltzmann equation for external beam radiation therapy. , 2008, Medical physics.

[37]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Measurement and calculation of neutron leakage from a medical electron accelerator. , 1986, Medical physics.

[38]  J F Williamson,et al.  Dosimetric modeling of the microselectron high-dose rate 192Ir source by the multigroup discrete ordinates method. , 2000, Medical physics.

[39]  J. Seco,et al.  Head-and-neck IMRT treatments assessed with a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  J F Williamson,et al.  Multigroup discrete ordinates modeling of 125I 6702 seed dose distributions using a broad energy-group cross section representation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[41]  Russell Feder,et al.  Neutronics analysis of the international thermonuclear experimental reactor (ITER) MCNP “Benchmark CAD Model” with the ATTILA discrete ordinance code , 2008 .

[42]  J. Baró,et al.  PENELOPE: An algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of the penetration and energy loss of electrons and positrons in matter , 1995 .