Climate change impact assessment: Uncertainty modeling with imprecise probability

Hydrologic impacts of climate change are usually assessed by downscaling the General Circulation Model (GCM) output of large-scale climate variables to local-scale hydrologic variables. Such an assessment is characterized by uncertainty resulting from the ensembles of projections generated with multiple GCMs, which is known as intermodel or GCM uncertainty. Ensemble averaging with the assignment of weights to GCMs based on model evaluation is one of the methods to address such uncertainty and is used in the present study for regional-scale impact assessment. GCM outputs of large-scale climate variables are downscaled to subdivisional-scale monsoon rainfall. Weights are assigned to the GCMs on the basis of model performance and model convergence, which are evaluated with the Cumulative Distribution Functions (CDFs) generated from the downscaled GCM output (for both 20th Century [20C3M] and future scenarios) and observed data. Ensemble averaging approach, with the assignment of weights to GCMs, is characterized by the uncertainty caused by partial ignorance, which stems from nonavailability of the outputs of some of the GCMs for a few scenarios (in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] data distribution center for Assessment Report 4 [AR4]). This uncertainty is modeled with imprecise probability, i.e., the probability being represented as an interval gray number. Furthermore, the CDF generated with one GCM is entirely different from that with another and therefore the use of multiple GCMs results in a band of CDFs. Representing this band of CDFs with a single valued weighted mean CDF may be misleading. Such a band of CDFs can only be represented with an envelope that contains all the CDFs generated with a number of GCMs. Imprecise CDF represents such an envelope, which not only contains the CDFs generated with all the available GCMs but also to an extent accounts for the uncertainty resulting from the missing GCM output. This concept of imprecise probability is also validated in the present study. The imprecise CDFs of monsoon rainfall are derived for three 30-year time slices, 2020s, 2050s and 2080s, with A1B, A2 and B1 scenarios. The model is demonstrated with the prediction of monsoon rainfall in Orissa meteorological subdivision, which shows a possible decreasing trend in the future.

[1]  Robert C. Williamson,et al.  Probabilistic arithmetic. I. Numerical methods for calculating convolutions and dependency bounds , 1990, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[2]  K. Trenberth,et al.  A Global Dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870–2002: Relationship with Soil Moisture and Effects of Surface Warming , 2004 .

[3]  James P. Hughes,et al.  Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation from observed and modelled atmospheric fields , 2004 .

[4]  R. Wilby,et al.  A framework for assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts: Low‐flow scenarios for the River Thames, UK , 2006 .

[5]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  A direct stochastic algorithm for global search , 2003, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  Measurement of GCM Skill in Predicting Variables Relevant for Hydroclimatological Assessments , 2009 .

[7]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Possibility theory , 2018, Scholarpedia.

[8]  P. P. Mujumdar,et al.  Grey fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system , 2006 .

[9]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[10]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Regional probabilities of precipitation change: A Bayesian analysis of multimodel simulations , 2004 .

[11]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Calculation of average, uncertainty range, and reliability of regional climate changes from AOGCM simulations via the reliability ensemble averaging (REA) method , 2002 .

[12]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change , 2000, Nature.

[13]  Peter Walley,et al.  Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability , 2000, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[14]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Probability of regional climate change based on the Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) method , 2003 .

[15]  R. Mehrotra,et al.  A nonparametric nonhomogeneous hidden Markov model for downscaling of multisite daily rainfall occurrences , 2005 .

[16]  Chong-Yu Xu,et al.  Statistical precipitation downscaling in central Sweden with the analogue method , 2005 .

[17]  Bruce Tonn.  Imprecise probabilities and scenarios , 2005 .

[18]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[19]  Subimal Ghosh,et al.  Modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty using a possibilistic approach: Application to the Mahanadi River, India , 2008 .

[20]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[21]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[22]  Ashish Sharma,et al.  A nonparametric stochastic downscaling framework for daily rainfall at multiple locations , 2006 .

[23]  T. Palmer,et al.  A Probability and Decision-Model Analysis of a Multimodel Ensemble of Climate Change Simulations , 2001 .

[24]  Jim W. Hall,et al.  Imprecise probabilities of climate change: aggregation of fuzzy scenarios and model uncertainties , 2007 .

[25]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  New Methods for Reasoning Towards PosteriorDistributions Based on Sample Data , 1966, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[26]  P. Walley.  Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities , 1990 .

[27]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Utilizing belief functions for the estimation of future climate change , 2005, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[28]  P. Whetton,et al.  Guidelines for Use of Climate Scenarios Developed from Statistical Downscaling Methods , 2004 .

[29]  Dug Hun Hong,et al.  Interval regression analysis using quadratic loss support vector machine , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[30]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[31]  G. Huang,et al.  Grey integer programming: An application to waste management planning under uncertainty , 1995 .

[32]  William F. Caselton,et al.  Decision making with imprecise probabilities: Dempster‐Shafer Theory and application , 1992 .

[33]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Interval regression analysis by quadratic programming approach , 1998, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[34]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[35]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[36]  Mike Hulme,et al.  Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: a Monte-Carlo approach , 2000 .

[37]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Projections of Regional Climate Change: A Bayesian Approach to the Analysis of Multimodel Ensembles , 2005 .

[38]  T. Wigley,et al.  Global patterns of ENSO‐induced precipitation , 2000 .

[39]  L. Hay,et al.  A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado , 1999 .

[40]  Subimal Ghosh,et al.  Nonparametric methods for modeling GCM and scenario uncertainty in drought assessment , 2007 .