Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory.

R. P. Carlyon, R. Cusack, J. M. Foxton, and I. H. Robertson (2001) have argued that attention is crucial for auditory streaming. The authors review R. P. Carlyon et al.'s (2001) arguments and suggest that a pertinent literature, the irrelevant sound paradigm--demonstrating preattentive auditory streaming--has been overlooked. In illustration of this alternative approach, the authors include a novel single experiment demonstrating the impact of preattentive auditory streaming on short-term serial memory. It is concluded that R. P. Carlyon et al.'s (2001) results do not definitively demonstrate that auditory streaming processes are dependent on attention; indeed, they are compatible with alternative accounts of the relationship between perceptual organization and attention.

[1]  R. M. Warren.  Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[2]  L. V. Noorden.  Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[3]  Alexander I. Rudnicky,et al.  Auditory segregation: stream or streams? , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  G L Dannenbring,et al.  Perceived auditory continuity with alternately rising and falling frequency transitions. , 1976, Canadian journal of psychology.

[5]  Alan B. Welsh,et al.  Acoustic masking in primary memory. , 1976 .

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[7]  Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) , 1980 .

[8]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech : Implications for the structure of working memory , 1982 .

[9]  A. Schick,et al.  Contributions to psychological acoustics : results of the ... Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics , 1986 .

[10]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? , 1990 .

[11]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: The role of segmentation , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect : Implications for phonological coding in working memory , 1993 .

[14]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in the effect of irrelevant speech: The role of spatial location and timing , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory babble and cognitive efficiency: Role of number of voices and their location , 1995 .

[16]  W J Macken,et al.  Functional characteristics of the inner voice and the inner ear: single or double agency? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Word Dose in the Disruption of Serial Recall by Irrelevant Speech: Phonological Confusions or Changing State? , 1996 .

[18]  Seiichiro Namba,et al.  Irrelevant background speech and human performance: Is there long-term habituation? , 1996 .

[19]  G. Hoopen.  Chapter 3 Auditory attention , 1996 .

[20]  C. P. Beaman,et al.  The object-oriented episodic record model , 1996 .

[21]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Models Of Short-Term Memory , 1996 .

[22]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[23]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Role of Serial Order in the Irrelevant Speech Effect: Tests of the Changing-State Hypothesis , 1997 .

[24]  Nick Mosdell,et al.  The role of habituation in the disruption of recall performance by irrelevant sound , 1997 .

[25]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. , 1998 .

[26]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Irrelevant Sound Disrupts Order Information in Free Recall as in Serial Recall , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing state? , 1999 .

[28]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Attentional Selectivity in Short-term Memory: Similarity of Process, Not Similarity of Content, Determines Disruption , 1999 .

[29]  Dylan Marc Jones.  The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture , 1999 .

[30]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect , 1999 .

[31]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Jessica M. Foxton,et al.  Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Bill Macken,et al.  Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect : Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 2001 .

[34]  A. Bregman.  Auditory Scene Analysis , 2001 .