Spurious Correlations in Mathematical Thinking

How does detection of correlational structure affect mathematical thinking and learning? When does correlational information lead to erroneous problem solving? Are experienced students susceptible to misleading correlations? This work attempts to answer these questions by examining a source of systematic errors termed the spurious-correlation effect. This effect is hypothesized to occur when a student perceives a correlation between an irrelevant feature in a problem and the algorithm used for solving that problem and then proceeds to execute the algorithm when detecting the feature in a different problem. In this research, we investigated whether students encode spurious correlations in memory and exhibit them during the learning process leading to ineffectual problem solving. Findings suggest that even experienced students rely on surface-structural feature-algorithm correlations for solving new problems. Implications for teaching are discussed.

[1]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Frequency norms and structural analysis of algebra story problems into families, categories, and templates , 1981 .

[2]  M. Levine,et al.  Hypothesis theory and nonlearning despite ideal S-R-reinforcement contingencies. , 1971 .

[3]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Memory for algebra story problems. , 1982 .

[4]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Learning from Examples Via Self-Explanations , 1988, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mathematical problem solving by analogy. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Talia Ben-Zeev,et al.  Rational Errors and the Mathematical Mind , 1998 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[10]  J. Sweller.  Transfer Effects in a Problem Solving Context , 1980 .

[11]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  A. D. D. Groot.  Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[14]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Paul W. Fingerman,et al.  Nonlearning: The completeness of the blindness , 1974 .

[16]  B. Ross,et al.  Content Effects in Problem Categorization and Problem Solving , 1996 .

[17]  A. Luchins.  Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[18]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Discrimination of operator schemata in problem solving: Learning from examples , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Lan,et al.  When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results : The Disasters of " Well Taught " Mathematics Courses , 2000 .

[20]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[21]  John Sweller,et al.  Hypothesis Salience, Task Difficulty, and Sequential Effects on Problem Solving , 1980 .

[22]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Context effects and their interaction with development: Area judgments , 1990 .

[23]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  E. Hearst,et al.  Addition versus deletion as a signal , 1989 .

[25]  A. Schoenfeld.  On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. , 1991 .

[26]  K. VanLehn.  Mind Bugs: The Origins of Procedural Misconceptions , 1990 .

[27]  J. Sweller,et al.  Einstellung, the sequence effect, and hypothesis theory. , 1978 .

[28]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems , 1985 .