On the issue that Finite Element discretizations violate, nodally, Clausius’s postulate of the second law of thermodynamics

Discretization processes leading to numerical schemes sometimes produce undesirable effects. One potentially serious problem is that a discretization may produce the loss of validity of some of the physical principles or mathematical properties originally present in the continuous equation. Such loss may lead to uncertain results such as numerical instabilities or unexpected non-physical solutions. As a consequence, the compatibility of a discrete formulation with respect to intrinsic physical principles might be essential for the success of a numerical scheme. This paper addresses such type of issue. Its main objective is to demonstrate that standard Finite Element discretizations of the heat conduction equation violate Clausius’s postulate of the second law of thermodynamics, at nodal level. The problem occurs because non-physical, reversed nodal heat-fluxes arise in such discretizations. Conditions for compatibility of discrete nodal heat-fluxes with respect to Clausius’s postulate are derived here and named discrete thermodynamic compatibility conditions (DTCC). Simple numerical examples are presented to show the undesirable consequences of such failure. It must be pointed out that such DTCCs have previously appeared in the context of the study of the conditions that make discrete solutions to satisfy the discrete maximum principle (DMP). However, the present article does not put attention on such mathematical principle but on the satisfaction of a fundamental physical one: the second law of thermodynamics. Of course, from the presented point of view, it is clear that the violation of such fundamental law will cause, among different problems, the violation of the DMP.

[1]  Richard S. Varga,et al.  On a Discrete Maximum Principle , 1966 .

[2]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Petrov-Galerkin methods for the transient advective-diffusive equation with sharp gradients , 1996 .

[3]  T. Kaczorek Positive 1D and 2D Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Róbert Horváth,et al.  Discrete maximum principle for linear parabolic problems solved on hybrid meshes , 2005 .

[5]  R. Clausius The Mechanical Theory Of Heat , 1879 .

[6]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Local error estimators for finite element linear analysis , 1999 .

[7]  Sergey Korotov,et al.  Weakened acute type condition for tetrahedral triangulations and the discrete maximum principle , 2001, Math. Comput..

[8]  R. Clausius,et al.  X. On a modified form of the second fundamental theorem in the mechanical theory of heat , 1856 .

[9]  S. Idelsohn,et al.  Objectivity tests for Navier–Stokes simulations: The revealing of non-physical solutions produced by Laplace formulations , 2008 .

[10]  Vidar Thomée,et al.  On the existence of maximum principles in parabolic finite element equations , 2008, Math. Comput..

[11]  Roland W. Lewis,et al.  A comparison of time marching schemes for the transient heat conduction equation , 1975 .

[12]  Ernst Rank,et al.  On the importance of the discrete maximum principle in transient analysis using finite element methods , 1983 .

[13]  Mats G. Larson,et al.  The Finite Element , 2013 .

[14]  A. Brandt Generalized Local Maximum Principles for Finite-Difference Operators , 1973 .

[15]  Siegfried Selberherr,et al.  On the interplay between meshing and discretization inthree-dimensional diffusion simulation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[16]  G. Rota Non-negative matrices in the mathematical sciences: A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons, Academic Press, 1979, 316 pp. , 1983 .

[17]  Jean-Michel Bergheau,et al.  Finite Element Simulation of Heat Transfer , 2008 .

[18]  Sophia Blau,et al.  Analysis Of The Finite Element Method , 2016 .

[19]  Antti Hannukainen,et al.  Discrete maximum principle for parabolic problems solved by prismatic finite elements , 2010, Math. Comput. Simul..

[20]  H. Schönheinz G. Strang / G. J. Fix, An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. (Series in Automatic Computation. XIV + 306 S. m. Fig. Englewood Clifs, N. J. 1973. Prentice‐Hall, Inc. , 1975 .

[21]  K. Bathe Conserving energy and momentum in nonlinear dynamics: A simple implicit time integration scheme , 2007 .

[22]  Enrico Bertolazzi,et al.  A Second-Order Maximum Principle Preserving Finite Volume Method for Steady Convection-Diffusion Problems , 2005, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[23]  Mario A. Storti,et al.  A Petrov-Galerkin formulation for advection-reaction-diffusion problems , 1996 .

[24]  Mario Putti,et al.  Accuracy of Galerkin finite elements for groundwater flow simulations in two and three‐dimensional triangulations , 2001 .

[25]  Long Chen FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[26]  Eugene Seneta,et al.  Non‐Negative Matrices , 1975 .

[27]  Pierre Ladevèze,et al.  Application of a posteriori error estimation for structural model updating , 1999 .

[28]  P. G. Ciarlet,et al.  Maximum principle and uniform convergence for the finite element method , 1973 .