The Syntactic and Semantic Processing of Mass and Count Nouns: An ERP Study

The present study addressed the question of whether count and mass nouns are differentially processed in the brain. In two different ERP (Event-Related Potentials) tasks we explored the semantic and syntactic levels of such distinction. Mass and count nouns typically differ in concreteness, hence the effect of this important variable was factorially examined in each task. Thus the stimuli presented were: count concrete, count abstract, mass concrete or mass abstract. The first experiment (concrete/abstract semantic judgment task) involved the interaction between the N400 concreteness effect and the Mass/Count condition, revealing a substantial effect between mass and count nouns at the semantic level. The second experiment (sentence syntactic violation task) showed a Mass/Count distinction on left anterior negativity (LAN) and on P600 components, confirming the difference at the syntactic level. This study suggests that the brain differentiates between count and mass nouns not only at the syntactic level but also at the semantic level. Implications for our understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying the Mass/Count distinction are discussed.

[1]  A. Damasioa,et al.  Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval , 2004 .

[2]  F. Rubia,et al.  Functional differences in the semantic processing of concrete and abstract words , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Tim Shallice,et al.  CATEGORY SPECIFICITY AND FEATURE KNOWLEDGE:EVIDENCE FROM NEW SENSORY-QUALITY CATEGORIES , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  David P. Vinson,et al.  Is "Count" and "Mass" Information Available When the Noun Is Not? An Investigation of Tip of the Tongue States and Anomia , 1999 .

[6]  S. Prasada,et al.  Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff , 2002, Cognition.

[7]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval , 2004, Cognition.

[8]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  The representation of grammatical categories in the brain , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  J. Kounios,et al.  Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  A. Paivio Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Claudio Iacobini,et al.  BDVDB : una base di dati sul vacabolario di base della lingua italiana , 1994 .

[13]  Susan Rothstein Events and Grammar , 2001 .

[14]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[15]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[16]  H. Neville,et al.  Language and , 2019, Adventure Diffusion.

[17]  Brendan S. Gillon,et al.  Towards a common semantics for english count and mass nouns , 1992 .

[18]  Brendan S. Gillon,et al.  Lexical access of mass and count nouns: How word recognition reaction times correlate with lexical and morpho-syntactic processing , 2009 .

[19]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  D. Lea Semantic errors. , 1984, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  G. Jarema,et al.  Semantics and syntax of mass and count nouns: Data from aphasia and dementia , 2004, Brain and Language.

[22]  H. Heinze,et al.  Mental representations of morphologically complex words: an event-related potential study with adult humans , 1996, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  C. Semenza,et al.  Mass and count nouns show distinct EEG cortical processes during an explicit semantic task , 2005, Brain and Language.

[24]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The grammatical properties of mass nouns: An aphasia case study , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[26]  Douglas Saddy,et al.  Distinct Neurophysiological Patterns Reflecting Aspects of Syntactic Complexity and Syntactic Repair , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  Chun-yan Guo,et al.  Concreteness effects in the processing of Chinese words , 2006, Brain and Language.

[28]  Friedemann Pulverm Uuml,et al.  Words in the brain's language , 1999 .

[29]  M. Grossman,et al.  The Sum and Substance of It: The Appreciation of Mass and Count Quantifiers in Parkinson′s Disease , 1993, Brain and Language.

[30]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Vanessa Taler,et al.  On-line lexical processing in AD and MCI: An early measure of cognitive impairment? , 2006, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[33]  J. Kounios,et al.  Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: an electrophysiological investigation. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. , 1986 .

[35]  K. Wynn,et al.  Infants' tracking of objects and collections , 2000, Cognition.

[36]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[37]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Plurality of Mass Nouns and the Notion of “Semantic Parameter” , 1998 .

[38]  A. Newman,et al.  How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features , 2001, Neuroreport.

[39]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[41]  E. Zurif,et al.  Comprehension of lexical subcategory distinctions by aphasic patients: proper/common and mass/count nouns. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[42]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[43]  R. Jackendoff Parts and boundaries , 1991, Cognition.

[44]  Vanessa Taler,et al.  The Mass/Count Distinction: Evidence from On-Line Psycholinguistic Performance , 1999, Brain and Language.

[45]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction , 2010, J. Semant..

[46]  Thomas F. Mnte,et al.  Brain Activity Associated with Syntactic Incongruencies in Words and Pseudo-Words , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Kliegel,et al.  The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Rita Nolan,et al.  Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems. , 1981 .

[49]  Susan Carey,et al.  Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small groups of discrete entities , 2002, Cognition.

[50]  P. Schwanenflugel Why are Abstract Concepts Hard to Understand , 2013 .

[51]  A. Friederici The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[52]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[53]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[54]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Mass and Count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Deep dysphasia: Analysis of a rare form of repetition disorder , 1990, Brain and Language.

[56]  C. Semenza,et al.  Count and Mass Nouns: semantic and syntax in aphasia and Alzheimer\'s disease , 2000 .

[57]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[58]  M. Grossman,et al.  An aspect of sentence processing in Alzheimer's disease , 1995, Neurology.

[59]  H. Laycock Mass nouns, Count nouns and Non-count nouns , 2005 .

[60]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Manuale di neuropsicologia , 2011 .

[61]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[62]  R. Knight,et al.  Separable effects of priming and imageability on word processing: an ERP study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[63]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count , 2005, Cognition.

[65]  H G Vaughan,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. , 1983, Psychophysiology.

[66]  Francis Jeffry Pelletier,et al.  Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems , 1980 .

[67]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[68]  Natasa Kovacevic,et al.  Groupwise independent component decomposition of EEG data and partial least square analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[69]  Laura Barca,et al.  Una base di dati sui valori di età di acquisizione, frequenza, familiarità, immaginabilità, concretezza, e altre variabili lessicali e sublessicali per 626 nomi dell'italiano , 2001 .

[70]  B. Abbott,et al.  The Psychology of Word Meanings. , 1992 .

[71]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Encyclopedia of language & linguistics , 2006 .

[72]  V. Taler,et al.  Processing of mass/count information in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2004, Brain and Language.