Which Combinations of Personal Characteristic Types are more Effective in Different Project-Based Learning Courses?

To improve practical IT education, many universities are implementing project-based learning (PBL). Although researchers have examined the relationship between projects and personality, they have not investigated the type of projects and team construction based on personality. We consider not to construct optimal team for the view of educational effectiveness if we do not understand the difference of each course characteristic. Herein the Five Factor & Stress theory is used to measure personal characteristics and classify students enrolled in two different PBL courses at a university into four types -- leadership, management, tugboat, and anchor. Then knowledge and skills questionnaires are used to measure educational effectiveness. The results show that educational effectiveness is highest when a team consists of management and anchor types but not leadership types in the PBL course which teaches system development, and a team without management types is consisted in the PBL course which teaches IT management strategy.

[1]  D. Partington,et al.  Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study , 1999 .

[2]  Lefteris Angelis,et al.  Links between the personalities, views and attitudes of software engineers , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[3]  Luiz Fernando Capretz,et al.  Making Sense of Software Development and Personality Types , 2010, IT Professional.

[4]  Katsuhiko Kakehi,et al.  Relation Between Combinations of Personal Characteristic Types and Educational Effectiveness for a Controlled Project-Based Learning Course , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[5]  Katsuhiko Kakehi,et al.  Team characteristics for maximizing the educational effectiveness of practical lectures on software intensive systems development , 2013, 2013 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).

[6]  Emilia Mendes,et al.  An empirical study of the effects of personality in pair programming using the five-factor model , 2009, 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[7]  Narasimhaiah Gorla,et al.  Who should work with whom?: building effective software project teams , 2004, CACM.

[8]  Komiya Seiichi,et al.  Optimal Team Formation for Software Development Exercise -- Evaluating a Method for Team Formation Based on the Type of Project Manager , 2009 .

[9]  Lefteris Angelis,et al.  Personality, emotional intelligence and work preferences in software engineering: An empirical study , 2014, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[10]  Katsuhiko Kakehi,et al.  The impacts of personal characteristic on educational effectiveness in controlled-project based learning on software intensive systems development , 2014, 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T).

[11]  A. Jones,et al.  Visualising career progression for ICT professionals and the implications for ICT curriculum design in higher education , 2014, ACE.

[12]  Alan R. Peslak The impact of personality on information technology team projects , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[13]  Anthony J. Cowling,et al.  A follow up study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams , 2006, ISESE '06.