Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics

Abstract For quantifying and modelling of landscape patterns, the patch matrix model (PMM) and the gradient model (GM) are fundamental concepts of landscape ecology. While the PMM model has been the backbone for our advances in landscape ecology, it may also hamper truly universal insights into process–pattern relationships. The PMM describes landscape structures as a mosaic of discretely delineated homogenous areas. This requires simplifications and assumptions which may even result in errors which propagate through subsequent analyses and may reduce our ability to understand effects of landscape structure on ecological processes. Alternative approaches to represent landscape structure should therefore be evaluated. The GM represents continuous surface characteristics without arbitrary vegetation or land-use classification and therefore does not require delineation of discrete areas with sharp boundaries. The GM therefore lends itself to be a more realistic representation of a particular surface characteristic. In the paper PMM and GM are compared regarding their prospects and limitations. Suggestions are made regarding the potential use and implementation of both approaches for process–pattern analysis. The ecological and anthropogenic process itself and its characteristics under investigation is decisive for: (i) the selection of discrete and/or continuous indicators, (ii) the type of the quantitative pattern analysis approach to be used (PMM/GM) and (iii) the data and the scale required in the analysis. Process characteristics and their effects on pattern characteristics in space and time are decisive for the applicability of the PMM or of the GM approach. A low hemeroby (high naturalness and low human pressure on landscapes) allows for high internal-heterogeneity in space and over time within patterns. Such landscapes can be captured with the GM approach. A high hemeroby reduces heterogeneity in space and time within patterns. For such landscapes we recommend the PMM model.

[1]  S. Schmidtlein,et al.  Mapping plant strategy types using remote sensing , 2012 .

[2]  Debra Bailey,et al.  Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in European agricultural landscapes , 2008 .

[3]  S. Linden,et al.  Cross-border Comparison of Post-socialist Farmland Abandonment in the Carpathians , 2008, Ecosystems.

[4]  F. Herzog,et al.  Supplementing Land-Use Statistics with Landscape Metrics: Some Methodological Considerations , 2001, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  L. Tischendorf.  Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[7]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: Integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization , 2012 .

[8]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Landscape functions in a changing environment. , 2010 .

[9]  Hannes Feilhauer,et al.  On variable relations between vegetation patterns and canopy reflectance , 2011, Ecol. Informatics.

[10]  M. Turner.  Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. , 2010, Ecology.

[11]  O. Bastian,et al.  A framework for monitoring landscape functions: The Saxon Academy Landscape Monitoring Approach (SALMA), exemplified by soil investigations in the Kleine Spree floodplain (Saxony, Germany) , 2007 .

[12]  A. Lausch.  Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability , 2002 .

[13]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Sustainable development and sustainable landscapes: defining a new paradigm for landscape ecology. , 2000 .

[14]  Felix Müller,et al.  Gradients in ecological systems , 1998 .

[15]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  Fragmentation of Continental United States Forests , 2002, Ecosystems.

[16]  D. Bailey,et al.  Thematic resolution matters: Indicators of landscape pattern for European agro-ecosystems , 2007 .

[17]  M. Turner.  Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  A. Lausch,et al.  Native and alien plant species richness in relation to spatial heterogeneity on a regional scale in Germany , 2003 .

[19]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study , 2007 .

[20]  Karsten Schulz,et al.  Monitoring and assessing of landscape heterogeneity at different scales , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[21]  Debra Bailey,et al.  The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Surface metrics: an alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of landscape structure , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  D. Bailey,et al.  Structural Versus Functional Habitat Connectivity Measures to Explain Bird Diversity in Fragmented Orchards , 2010 .

[24]  U. Walz,et al.  Linking landscape structure and biodiversity , 2013 .

[25]  T. Blaschke.  The role of the spatial dimension within the framework of sustainable landscapes and natural capital , 2006 .

[26]  D. Bailey,et al.  Effects of habitat amount and isolation on biodiversity in fragmented traditional orchards , 2010 .

[27]  A. Lausch,et al.  A new multiscale approach for monitoring vegetation using remote sensing-based indicators in laboratory, field, and landscape , 2013, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[28]  J. Kupfer.  Landscape ecology and biogeography , 2012 .

[29]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Assessing structural effects on PRI for stress detection in conifer forests , 2011 .

[30]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Identifying and Quantifying Landscape Patterns in Space and Time , 2007 .

[31]  Uta Steinhardt,et al.  Lehrbuch der Landschaftsökologie , 2012 .

[32]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Leaf chemical and spectral diversity in Australian tropical forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[33]  O. Bastian,et al.  Anthropogenic landscape changes in Central Europe and the role of bioindication , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency , 2008 .

[35]  Angela Lausch,et al.  Mapping the local variability of Natura 2000 habitats with remote sensing , 2014 .

[36]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System — a methodological outline , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  P. Šímová,et al.  Landscape indices behavior: A review of scale effects , 2012 .

[38]  U. Walz,et al.  Structural indicators for the assessment of biodiversity and their connection to the richness of avifauna , 2013 .

[39]  Ulrich Walz,et al.  Indicators of hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany , 2014 .

[40]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  The Gradient Paradigm: A conceptual and analytical framework for landscape ecology [Chapter 5] , 2010 .

[41]  R. O'Neill,et al.  A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  Falk Huettmann,et al.  Spatial complexity, informatics, and wildlife conservation , 2010 .

[43]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Use and misuse of landscape indices , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[44]  E. Uuemaa,et al.  Analysing the spatial structure of the Estonian landscapes: which landscape metrics are the most suitable for comparing different landscapes? , 2011 .

[45]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger.  Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[46]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[47]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[48]  S. Hoechstetter,et al.  Effects of topography and surface roughness in analyses of landscape structure - A proposal to modify the existing set of landscape metrics , 2008 .

[49]  J. W. Bruce,et al.  The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths , 2001 .

[50]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Issues and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology: The gradient concept of landscape structure , 2005 .

[51]  U. Walz,et al.  Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics , 2012 .

[52]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Sensitivity of selected landscape pattern metrics to land-cover misclassification and differences in land-cover composition , 1997 .

[53]  R. Forman.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1995 .

[54]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Mapping biomass and stress in the Sierra Nevada using lidar and hyperspectral data fusion , 2011 .

[55]  A. Lausch,et al.  Analysis of Vegetation and Soil Patterns using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing, EMI, and Gamma‐Ray Measurements , 2013 .

[56]  E. Uuemaa,et al.  Trends in the use of landscape spatial metrics as landscape indicators: A review , 2013 .

[57]  R. Forman,et al.  Patches and Structural Components for A Landscape Ecology , 1981 .

[58]  M. Turner.  Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? , 2005 .

[59]  G. Carter,et al.  Leaf optical properties in higher plants: linking spectral characteristics to stress and chlorophyll concentration. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[60]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Landscape Pattern Metrics , 2014 .

[61]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Sources of Canopy Chemical and Spectral Diversity in Lowland Bornean Forest , 2012, Ecosystems.