Influence of mechanical hemolysis of blood on two D-dimer immunoassays

Although there is broad information about the influence of spurious hemolysis on several laboratory tests, less is known on the bias produced on D-dimer testing. Four different pools were obtained from primary blood tubes, and each of them was divided into four aliquots. The first nonhemolyzed was centrifuged, the plasma was separated and then tested for hemolysis index and D-dimer. The second (hemolyzed aliquot A), third (hemolyzed aliquot B) and fourth (hemolyzed aliquot C) aliquots were mechanically hemolyzed by aspirating whole blood one, two and three times through a fine needle. The plasma was then separated and tested for hemolysis index and D-dimer. D-dimer was quantified by HemosIL AcuStar D-dimer and HemosIL D-dimer HS for ACL TOP. Undetectable hemolysis was present in aliquot nonhemolyzed (<0.5 g/l), whereas the concentration of cell-free hemoglobin significantly increased from hemolyzed aliquot A (5.5–7.0 g/l hemoglobin) to hemolyzed aliquot B (11.5 and 15.0 g/l hemoglobin) and hemolyzed aliquot C (20–22 g/l hemoglobin). The plasma concentration of D-dimer decreased from aliquots nonhemolyzed to hemolyzed aliquot C, achieving clinical significance fromhemolyzed aliquot A and hemolyzed aliquot B when measured with D-dimer HS for ACL TOP and AcuStar D-dimer, respectively. The decrease with AcuStar D-dimer was −5 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot A, −7 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot B, and −9 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot C, whereas the decrease with D-dimer HS for ACL TOP was −5 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot A, −8 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot B and −9 ± 3% in hemolyzed aliquot C. The similar trend towards decreasing values observed when measuring D-dimer with chemiluminescent and turbidimetric immmunoassays on four heterogeneous plasma pools suggest that the hemolysis interference is more likely to be biological than analytical. The modest bias observed in samples with frank hemolysis (i.e. cell-free hemoglobin of 11.5 g/l) confirms that both methods are robust against this type of interference, so that test results might be released in the majority of mildly hemolyzed samples.

[1]  G. Lippi,et al.  Influence of in vitro hemolysis on hematological testing on Advia 2120 , 2012, International journal of laboratory hematology.

[2]  G. Lippi,et al.  Analytical performance of the new ACL AcuStar HemosIL D-Dimer , 2012, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[3]  G. Lippi,et al.  Influence of hemolysis on troponin testing: studies on Beckman Coulter UniCel Dxl 800 Accu-TnI and overview of the literature , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[4]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories , 2011, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[5]  G. Lippi,et al.  Prevalence of hemolytic specimens referred for arterial blood gas analysis , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  D. Green Interpreting coagulation assays , 2010, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[7]  G. Lippi,et al.  Quality issues in laboratory haemostasis , 2010, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[8]  G. Lippi,et al.  Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future , 2010, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[9]  F. Heath,et al.  Comparison of quantitative immunoturbidimetric and semiquantitative latex-agglutination assays for D-dimer measurement in canine plasma. , 2009, Veterinary clinical pathology.

[10]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of the hemolysis index in automated clinical chemistry systems , 2009, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[11]  G. Lippi,et al.  Performance of the automated and rapid HemosIL D-Dimer HS on the ACL TOP analyzer , 2008, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[12]  G. Lippi,et al.  Preanalytical and Postanalytical Variables: The Leading Causes of Diagnostic Error in Hemostasis? , 2008, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[13]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories , 2008, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[14]  G. Lippi,et al.  Prevalence and type of pre-analytical problems for inpatients samples in coagulation laboratory. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  W. Roberts,et al.  Performance characteristics of the AxSYM D-dimer assay. , 2008, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[16]  G. Lippi,et al.  Help me, Doctor! My D-dimer is raised , 2008, Annals of medicine.

[17]  G. Lippi,et al.  Quality and reliability of routine coagulation testing: can we trust that sample? , 2006, Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis.

[18]  G. Lippi,et al.  Interference of blood cell lysis on routine coagulation testing. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[19]  R. Junker,et al.  Interferences in coagulation tests – evaluation of the 570-nm method on the Dade Behring BCS analyser , 2005, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.