How Risky is Biological Control

The potential harmful effects of non—indigenous species introduced for biological control remain an important unanswered question, which we addressed by undertaking a literature review. There are few documented instances of damage to non—target organisms or the environment from non—indigenous species released for biological pest control, relative to the number of such releases. However, this fact is not evidence that biological control is safe, because monitoring of non—target species is minimal, particularly in sites and habitats far from the point of release. In fact, the discovery of such impacts usually rests on a remarkable concatenation of events. In addition to trophic and competitive interactions between an individual introduced species and a native one, many effects of introduced species on ecosystems are possible, as are numerous types of indirect interactions. Predicting such impacts is no mean feat, and the difficulty is exacerbated by the fact that introduced species can disperse and evolve. Current regulation of introduced biological—control agents, particularly of entomophages, is insufficient. At the very least, strong consideration should be given to the likely impact of both the pest and its natural enemy on natural ecosystems and their species, and not only on potential costs to agriculture, silvi—culture, and species of immediate commercial value.

[1]  D. Donnelly,et al.  Expansion of host-plant range of a biocontrol agent Trichilogaster acaciaelongifoliae (Pteromalidae) released against the weed Acacia longifolia in South Africa , 1993 .

[2]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Benefits and costs of controlling rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic organisms: search for a null hypothesis and regulatory compromise , 1993 .

[3]  R. Gordon,et al.  Field guide to recently introduced species of coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in North America, with a revised key to north American genera of coccinellini , 1991 .

[4]  M. Williamson.  Environmental risks from the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs)–the need for molecular ecology , 1992 .

[5]  R. Pemberton.  Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the United States: An Immigrant Biological Control Agent or an Introduction of the Nursery Industry? , 1995 .

[6]  G. Bush.  Sympatric Speciation in Phytophagous Parasitic Insects , 1975 .

[7]  R. Myers.  SITE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO INVASION BY THE EXOTIC TREE MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA IN SOUTHERN FLORIDA , 1983 .

[8]  J. Harper.  The role of predation in vegetational diversity. , 1969, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[9]  J. Waage,et al.  Biological control: challenges and opportunities , 1988 .

[10]  J. Linsley.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL I , 1991 .

[11]  S. Porter,et al.  Invasion of Polygyne Fire Ants Decimates Native Ants and Disrupts Arthropod Community , 1990 .

[12]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation of pristine habitats and unintended effects of biological control. , 1992 .

[13]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Invasion of red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): microgeography of competitive replacement , 1988 .

[14]  J. R. Coulson,et al.  Biological Control of Purple LoosestrifeA case for using insects as control agents, after rigorous screening, and for integrating release strategies with research , 1993 .

[15]  John W. Beardsley,et al.  A Review of Biological Control Introductions in Hawaii: 1890 to 1985 , 1988 .

[16]  O. H. Swezey.  Records of Introduction of Beneficial Insects into the Hawaiian Islands , 1923 .

[17]  A. S. Cheke,et al.  Studies of Mascarene Island birds: An ecological history of the Mascarene Islands, with particular reference to extinctions and introductions of land vertebrates , 1987 .

[18]  D. Simberloff.  The ecology of extinction , 1993 .

[19]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Applied Myrmecology: A World Perspective , 1990 .

[20]  Mo,et al.  The Frankenstein Effect: impact of introduced fishes on native fishes in North America , 1985 .

[21]  D. Simberloff.  CHAPTER 1 – Keystone Species and Community Effects of Biological Introductions , 1991 .

[22]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Method in Ecology: Strategies for Conservation , 1993 .

[23]  E. C. Zimmerman.  Insects Of Hawaii , 1948 .

[24]  M. McClure.  Density-dependent feedback and population cycles in Adelges tsugae (Homoptera : Adelgidae) on Tsuga canadensis , 1991 .

[25]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[26]  R. Carruthers,et al.  Perspective on the use of exotic natural enemies for biological control of pest grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) , 1993 .

[27]  R. Honegger.  List of amphibians and reptiles either known or thought to have become extinct since 1600 , 1981 .

[28]  J. Ewel,et al.  Invasibility: Lessons from South Florida , 1986 .

[29]  B. Norton.  Why Preserve Natural Variety? , 2014 .

[30]  P. Ewald,et al.  Host-Parasite Relations, Vectors, and the Evolution of Disease Severity , 1983 .

[31]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  THE POTENTIAL FOR EVOLUTION OF HEAVY METALS TOLERANCE IN PLANTS.I. COPPER AND ZINC TOLERANCE IN AGROSTIS TENUIS , 1974 .

[32]  D. Pimentel,et al.  NEW ASSOCIATIONS IN BIOLOGICAL CONTROL: THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1989, The Canadian Entomologist.

[33]  F. D. Bennett.  DO INTRODUCED PARASITOIDS DISPLACE NATIVE ONES , 1993 .

[34]  E. C. Zimmerman.  Insects of Hawaii. Volume 9, Microlepidoptera. , 1978 .

[35]  L. Ehler.  CHAPTER 2 – Planned Introductions in Biological Control , 1991 .

[36]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Environmental issues involved in biological control of rangeland grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic agents. , 1993 .

[37]  P. Lai.  Biological Control: A Positive Point of View , 1988 .

[38]  J. Williams,et al.  Dispersal of exotic species from aquaculture sources, with emphasis on freshwater fishes , 1992 .

[39]  C. Lever.  Naturalized mammals of the world , 1985 .

[40]  N. W. Moore,et al.  The Bird of Time , 1988 .

[41]  P. Schaefer,et al.  North American Distribution of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and Its Mass Appearance in Coastal Delaware , 1987 .

[42]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[43]  P. Schaefer,et al.  Significance of host specificity in classical biological control. , 1992 .

[44]  D. Pimentel,et al.  NEW APPROACH FOR SELECTING BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS , 1984, The Canadian Entomologist.

[45]  R. Paine.  A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[46]  L. Ehler.  Environmental impact of introduced biological-control agents: implications for agricultural biotechnology. , 1990 .