On Temporality in Discourse Annotation: Theoretical and Practical Considerations

Temporal information is one of the prominent features that determine the coherence in a discourse. That is why we need an adequate way to deal with this type of information during discourse annotation. In this paper, we will argue that temporal order is a relational rather than a segment-specific property, and that it is a cognitively plausible notion: temporal order is expressed in the system of linguistic markers and is relevant in both acquisition and language processing. This means that temporal relations meet the requirements set by the Cognitive approach of Coherence Relations (CCR) to be considered coherence relations, and that CCR would need a way to distinguish temporal relations within its annotation system. We will present merits and drawbacks of different options of reaching this objective and argue in favor of adding temporal order as a new dimension to CCR.

[1]  T. Sanders,et al.  “Why? Because I’m talking to you!” Parental input and cognitive complexity as determinants of children’s connective acquisition , 2014 .

[2]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Causal categories in discourse: Converging evidence from language use , 2009 .

[3]  N. Stukker.  Causality marking across levels of language structure: A cognitive semantic analysis of causal verbs and causal connectives in Dutch , 2005 .

[4]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  English Text: System and structure , 1992 .

[5]  M. Louwerse.  An analytic and cognitve parameterization of coherence relations , 2002 .

[6]  Rashmi Prasad,et al.  Realization of Discourse Relations by Other Means: Alternative Lexicalizations , 2010, COLING.

[7]  E. Hinrichs.  Temporal anaphora in discourses of english , 1986, Linguistics and Philosophy.

[8]  Yves Bestgen,et al.  Time, Space, and Action - Exploring the Narrative Structure and its Linguistic Marking , 1994 .

[9]  J. Evers-Vermeul.  The development of Dutch connectives : change and acquisition as windows on form-function relations , 2005 .

[10]  D. Townsend.  Thematic processing in sentences and texts , 1983, Cognition.

[11]  L. Danlos.  “Discourse Verbs” and Discourse Periphrastic Links , 2006 .

[12]  J. Nerbonne.  Reference time and time in narration , 1986 .

[13]  Juhani Järvikivi,et al.  Children and situation models of multiple events. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[14]  P. Uccelli.  Emerging temporality: past tense and temporal/aspectual markers in Spanish-speaking children's intra-conversational narratives* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[15]  Barbara H. Partes.  Nominal and temporal anaphora , 1984 .

[16]  A. Trosborg,et al.  Children's comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’ reinvestigated , 1982, Journal of Child Language.

[17]  Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul,et al.  Parental input and connective acquisition: A growth curve analysis , 2009 .

[18]  Andrew Kehler.  Temporal Relations Reference or Discourse Coherence? , 1994, ACL.

[19]  Eduard Hovy,et al.  Parsimonious or Profligate: How Many and Which Discourse Structure Relations? , 1992 .

[20]  Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al.  The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited , 1991 .

[21]  Thomas Givon,et al.  Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Volume I , 1984 .

[22]  J. Mandler.  On the comprehension of temporal order , 1986 .

[23]  T. Sanders,et al.  The emergence of Dutch connectives; how cumulative cognitive complexity explains the order of acquisition* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  M. Tanenhaus.  Afterword The impact of “The cognitive basis for linguistic structures” , 2013 .

[25]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Temporal references and temporal relations in sentence comprehension. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  J. M. Peirce.  Aspect , 1871, Nature.

[27]  Linda Baker,et al.  Processing Temporal Relationships in Simple Stories: Effects of Input Sequence. Technical Report No. 84. , 1978 .

[28]  Magdalena Rysova.  Alternative Lexicalizations of Discourse Connectives in Czech , 2012, LREC.

[29]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[30]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 Annotation Manual , 2007 .

[31]  K. Cain,et al.  Young Children's Comprehension of Temporal Relations in Complex Sentences: The Influence of Memory on Performance , 2015, Child development.

[32]  Harry Bunt,et al.  ISO DR-Core (ISO 24617-8): Core Concepts for the Annotation of Discourse Relations , 2016, ACL 2016.

[33]  Livio Robaldo,et al.  The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. , 2008, LREC.

[34]  Hannah M. Nash,et al.  The influence of connectives on young readers' processing and comprehension of text. , 2011 .

[35]  D. Blakemore.  Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers , 2002 .

[36]  Deborah Keller-Cohen.  Context and strategy in acquiring temporal connectives , 1987 .

[37]  E. Clark.  On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after , 1971 .

[38]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[39]  Merel Scholman,et al.  Categories of coherence relations in discourse annotation , 2016, Dialogue Discourse.

[40]  H L Johnson,et al.  The meaning of before and after for preschool children. , 1975, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[41]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  The processing of underspecified coherence relations , 1997 .

[42]  Fatemeh Torabi Asr,et al.  Unifying dimensions in coherence relations: How various annotation frameworks are related , 2018 .

[43]  Fatemeh Torabi Asr,et al.  Uniform Information Density at the Level of Discourse Relations: Negation Markers and Discourse Connective Omission , 2015 .

[44]  E. Traugott.  Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change , 2011 .

[45]  B. K. Britton.  Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights. , 1994 .

[46]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  The Interpretation of Tense in Discourse , 1987, ACL.

[47]  A. Głaz.  Point of View and Grammar: Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation (review) , 2004 .

[48]  Jerry R. Hobbs.  Why Is Discourse Coherent , 1978 .

[49]  Amália Mendes,et al.  LDM-PT - A Portuguese Lexicon of Discourse Markers , 2016 .

[50]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Semantic Distinctions and Memory for Complex Sentences , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  L. Bloom,et al.  Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[52]  Alison Hall,et al.  Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures , 2007 .

[53]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Rearranging the world: Neural network supporting the processing of temporal connectives , 2012, NeuroImage.

[54]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[55]  Ted Sanders,et al.  The Role of Coherence Relations and Their Linguistic Markers in Text Processing , 2000 .

[56]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Comprehension of before and after in logical and arbitrary sequences , 1977, Journal of Child Language.

[57]  E. Traugott.  (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment , 2010 .

[58]  T. Sanders,et al.  Subjectivity and prototype structure in causal connectives: a cross-linguistic perspective , 2012 .

[59]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations , 1992 .

[60]  Elke van der Meer,et al.  Temporal order relations in language comprehension. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Amália Mendes,et al.  Some considerations on the use of main verbs to express rhetorical relations , 2016 .

[62]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[63]  A. Knott,et al.  Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. , 1994 .

[64]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  Building a Discourse-Tagged Corpus in the Framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory , 2001, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[65]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Coherence relations in a cognitive theory of discourse representation , 1993 .

[66]  Marta Kutas,et al.  When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.

[67]  Bonnie L. Webber,et al.  Tense as Discourse Anaphor , 1988, CL.

[68]  Yves Bestgen,et al.  The Role of Temporal Markers in the Segmentation of Narrative Discourse , 1991 .

[69]  T. Sanders,et al.  Causal connectives in discourse processing: How differences in subjectivity are reflected in eye movements , 2013 .

[70]  T. Givón,et al.  Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction , 1982 .

[71]  T. Sanders,et al.  The role of causality in discourse processing: Effects of expectation and coherence relations , 2013 .

[72]  S. Levinson.  Presumptive Meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature , 2001 .

[73]  Andrew Kehler,et al.  Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar , 2002, CSLI lecture notes series.

[74]  Wilbert Spooren,et al.  Exceptions to rules: a qualitative analysis of backward causal connectives in Dutch naturalistic discourse , 2013 .

[75]  Arie Verhagen,et al.  Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives : Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization , 2008 .

[76]  Rolf A. Zwaan.  Processing Narrative Time Shifts , 1996 .

[77]  Barbara Adam.  The timescapes challenge: engagement with the invisible temporal , 2008 .