Global environmental costs of China's thirst for milk. (5),

: 29 China has an ever-increasing thirst for milk, with a predicted 3.2-fold increase in 30 demand by 2050 compared to the production level in 2010. What are the environmental 31 implications of meeting this demand, and what is the preferred pathway? We addressed 32 these questions by using a nexus approach, to examine the interdependencies of 33 increasing milk consumption in China by 2050 and its global impacts, under different 34 scenarios of domestic milk production and importation. Meeting China’s milk demand 35 in a business as usual scenario will increase global dairy-related (China and the leading 36 milk exporting regions) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 35% (from 565 to 764 Tg 37 CO 2 ) and land use for dairy feed production by 32% (from 84 to 111 million ha) 38 compared to 2010, while reactive nitrogen losses from the dairy sector will increase by 39 48% (from 3.6 to 5.4 Tg nitrogen). Producing all additional milk in China with current 40 technology will greatly increase animal feed import; from 1.9 to 8.5 Tg for concentrates 41 and from 1.0 to 6.2 Tg for forage (alfalfa). In addition, it will increase domestic dairy 42 related GHG emissions by 2.2 times compared to 2010 levels. Importing the extra milk 43 will transfer the environmental burden from China to milk exporting countries; current dairy exporting countries may be unable to produce all additional milk due to physical 45 limitations or environmental preferences/legislation. For example, the farmland area 46 for cattle-feed production in New Zealand would have to increase by more than 57% 47 (0.1 million ha) and that in Europe by more than 39% (0.5 million ha), while GHG 48 emissions and nitrogen losses would increase roughly proportionally with the increase 49 of farmland in both regions. We propose that a more sustainable dairy future will rely 50 on high milk demanding regions (such as China) improving their domestic milk and 51 feed production efficiencies up to the level of leading milk producing countries. This 52 will decrease the global dairy related GHG emissions and land use by 12% (90 Tg CO 2 53 reduction) and 30% (34 million ha land reduction) compared to the business as usual 54 scenario, respectively. However, this still represents an increase in total GHG 55 emissions of 19% whereas land use will decrease by 8% when compared with 2010 56 levels. 57

[1]  Kevin Fellingham,et al.  Tackling climate change , 2018, Architecture and Resilience.

[2]  Mengru Wang,et al.  Reactive nitrogen losses from China's food system for the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  S. Ledgard,et al.  Nutrient losses and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in China: Lessons learned from historical changes and regional differences. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Flows through the Manure Management Chain in China. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Y. Lü,et al.  Quantifying the impacts of grassland restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in China: A meta-analysis , 2016 .

[6]  Jianbo Shen,et al.  Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers , 2016, Nature.

[7]  J. France,et al.  Models for predicting enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in North America, Europe, and Australia and New Zealand , 2016, Global change biology.

[8]  T. Kastner,et al.  Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade , 2016 .

[9]  Fusuo Zhang,et al.  Alarming nutrient pollution of Chinese rivers as a result of agricultural transitions , 2016 .

[10]  G. Velthof,et al.  Feed use and nitrogen excretion of livestock in EU-27 , 2016 .

[11]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade , 2016 .

[12]  S. Henders,et al.  Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities , 2015 .

[13]  Oene Oenema,et al.  Nitrogen excretion factors of livestock in the European Union: a review. , 2015, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[14]  O. Oenema,et al.  Changes in pig production in China and their effects on nitrogen and phosphorus use and losses. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Jianliang Huang,et al.  Producing more grain with lower environmental costs , 2014, Nature.

[16]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  Feeding humanity through global food trade , 2014 .

[17]  Ron Milo,et al.  Partitioning United States' feed consumption among livestock categories for improved environmental cost assessments , 2014, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[18]  C. D. de Klein,et al.  Intensification of grassland and forage use: driving forces and constraints , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[19]  Huilong Lin,et al.  Developing the Agro-Grassland System to Insure Food Security of China , 2014 .

[20]  M. Sutton,et al.  Food choices, health and environment: Effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake , 2014 .

[21]  J. Galloway,et al.  Food and feed trade as a driver in the global nitrogen cycle: 50-year trends , 2014, Biogeochemistry.

[22]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. Lesschen,et al.  The nitrogen footprint of food products in the European Union , 2013, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[24]  O. Oenema,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiencies in dairy production in china. , 2013, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  Wu Yang,et al.  Water Sustainability for China and Beyond , 2012, Science.

[26]  R. Mattar,et al.  Lactose intolerance: diagnosis, genetic, and clinical factors , 2012, Clinical and experimental gastroenterology.

[27]  J. Bruinsma,et al.  World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision , 2012 .

[28]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations , 2012, Nature.

[29]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products , 2012, Ecosystems.

[30]  D. Tilman,et al.  Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  H. Witzke,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors , 2011 .

[32]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  Integrated soil–crop system management for food security , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Wei Huang,et al.  The China Melamine Milk Scandal and its Implications for Food Safety Regulation , 2011 .

[34]  P. Ciais,et al.  The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China , 2010, Nature.

[35]  Marcin Menkes,et al.  International Organisations, Climate Change Expectations, and the Reality of Institutionalisation – An Analysis of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) , 2010 .

[36]  C. A. Rotz,et al.  Nitrogen use efficiency: A potential performance indicator and policy tool for dairy farms , 2010 .

[37]  Le Kang,et al.  Grassland ecosystems in China: review of current knowledge and research advancement , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  R. DeFries,et al.  Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  X. Yang,et al.  Developmental potential of vitrified holstein cattle embryos fertilized in vitro with sex-sorted sperm. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China , 2006 .

[41]  睦代 門平,et al.  Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) , 2002, International Organizations and the Law of the Sea 2001.

[42]  T. Thomas,et al.  Cropland expansion , 2020 .

[43]  K. Kelling,et al.  Nutrient Management , 2020, Potato Production Systems.

[44]  S. Passel Food Miles to assess sustainability: A revision , 2013 .

[45]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[46]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[47]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption , 2011 .

[48]  F. Ludwig,et al.  The Impacts of Climate Change on Water , 2009 .

[49]  Li Kai-lang Thought on Accelerating the Application of TMR Feeding Technique in China , 2009 .

[50]  O. Zhu,et al.  Cultivation Pattern and Development of Quality Forage in the North China Plain , 2007 .

[51]  H. Feng Potential of Grassland Agriculture in Southern China and Its Significance to Food Security , 2007 .

[52]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[53]  Food Security Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) , 2004 .

[54]  A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products Products , 2022 .