Similarity to the self influences memory for social targets

The construct of the self is important in the domain of memory research. Recent work has shown that person memory is influenced by similarity of social targets to the self. The current experiments investigate self-similarity as defined by traits and political ideology to better understand how memory for social targets is organised. Across three experiments, participants formed positive or negative impressions based on each target's picture, a trait-implying behavior (Experiments 1 & 2), and/or political ideology (conservative/liberal label in Experiment 2; political-ideological belief statements in Experiment 3) followed by a memory test. Results showed a self-similarity effect dependent on valence in Experiment 1, but not in Experiments 2 or 3 when participants processed ideological information associated with targets. These results suggest that self-similarity has an effect on memory for social targets, but that ideological information disrupts self-focused processing of others, suggesting that ideological information also has a powerful influence on what people remember about others (i.e. social targets).

[1]  K. Szpunar,et al.  The reciprocal relationship between episodic memory and future thinking: How the outcome of predictions is subsequently remembered , 2022, Brain and behavior.

[2]  A. Sklenar,et al.  The influence of memory on approach and avoidance decisions: Investigating the role of episodic memory in social decision making , 2022, Cognition.

[3]  Ryan C. Leach,et al.  Examining the influence of brain stimulation to the medial prefrontal cortex on the self‐reference effect in memory , 2021, Brain and behavior.

[4]  Matthew P. McCurdy,et al.  Less Constrained Practice Tests Enhance the Testing Effect for Item Memory but Not Context Memory , 2021, American Journal of Psychology.

[5]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Mnemic Neglect for Behaviors Enacted by Members of One’s Nationality Group , 2021 .

[6]  A. Gutchess,et al.  STOP SHOUTING AT ME: The Influence of Case and Self-Referencing on Explicit and Implicit Memory , 2021, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  Matthew P. McCurdy,et al.  Value-directed memory effects on item and context memory , 2021, Memory & Cognition.

[8]  Aaron R. Caldwell,et al.  Simulation-Based Power Analysis for Factorial Analysis of Variance Designs , 2021, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[9]  David G. Rand,et al.  Political sectarianism in America , 2020, Science.

[10]  Ayanna K. Thomas,et al.  Effects of Survival Processing on Item and Context Memory: Enhanced Memory for Survival-Relevant Details , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[11]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Future thinking about social targets: The influence of prediction outcome on memory , 2020, Cognition.

[12]  W. Viechtbauer,et al.  Theories of the generation effect and the impact of generation constraint: A meta-analytic review , 2020, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  Brittany S. Cassidy Valenced appearance-behavior cues affect the extent of impression memory , 2020, Memory.

[14]  Eric D Leshikar,et al.  Fewer generation constraints increase the generation effect for item and source memory through enhanced relational processing , 2020, Memory.

[15]  Laura Mieth,et al.  Adaptive memory: Source memory is positively associated with adaptive social decision making , 2019, Cognition.

[16]  Ryan C. Leach,et al.  Fewer Constraints Enhance the Generation Effect for Source Memory in Younger, but not Older Adults , 2019, Open Psychology.

[17]  Laura E. Matzen,et al.  Differential Age Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Associative Memory. , 2019, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  Meghan L. Meyer,et al.  Why People Are Always Thinking about Themselves: Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity during Rest Primes Self-referential Processing , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Jarret T. Crawford,et al.  Political Opposites Do Not Attract: The Effects of Ideological Dissimilarity on Impression Formation , 2018 .

[20]  Erik A. Wing,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying subsequent memory for personal beliefs:An fMRI study , 2018, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  Jay J. Van Bavel,et al.  The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Laura E. Matzen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during encoding improves recall but not recognition memory , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  L. Skitka,et al.  Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions , 2017 .

[24]  Jarret T. Crawford Are Conservatives More Sensitive to Threat than Liberals? It Depends on How We Define Threat and Conservatism , 2017 .

[25]  Ryan C. Leach,et al.  The Generation Effect Revisited: Fewer Generation Constraints Enhances Item and Context Memory , 2017 .

[26]  S. Brédart A Self-Reference Effect on Memory for People: We Are Particularly Good at Retrieving People Named Like Us , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[27]  Brittany S. Cassidy,et al.  Similarity to the self influences cortical recruitment during impression formation , 2015, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[28]  Lindsay E. Hunter,et al.  Episodic memories predict adaptive value-based decision-making. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Alexander Todorov,et al.  The Robustness of Learning about the Trustworthiness of Other People , 2015 .

[30]  A. Gutchess,et al.  Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others in Younger and Older Adults. , 2015, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[31]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Spontaneous evaluative inferences and their relationship to spontaneous trait inferences. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Gutchess,et al.  Similarity to the Self Affects Memory for Impressions of Others. , 2015, Journal of applied research in memory and cognition.

[33]  Jarret T. Crawford,et al.  Political Intolerance, Right and Left , 2014 .

[34]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[35]  Audrey Duarte,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory for self-referenced materials in young and older adults , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[36]  Mark Brandt,et al.  The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis , 2014 .

[37]  Brittany S. Cassidy,et al.  Valence-based age differences in medial prefrontal activity during impression formation , 2013, Social neuroscience.

[38]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Ideology and Prejudice , 2013, Psychological science.

[39]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[40]  Brittany S. Cassidy,et al.  Social relevance enhances memory for impressions in older adults , 2012, Memory.

[41]  J. Jost,et al.  Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence , 2012 .

[42]  Audrey Duarte,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory accuracy for self-referenced items , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[43]  Brett M. Wells,et al.  Inference making and linking both require thinking: Spontaneous trait inference and spontaneous trait transference both rely on working memory capacity , 2011 .

[44]  Selin Kesebir,et al.  A Spontaneous Self-Reference Effect in Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[45]  C. Moulin,et al.  When's your birthday? The self-reference effect in retrieval of dates , 2010 .

[46]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Memory for friends or foes: The social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[47]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Individualism, conservatism, and radicalism as criteria for processing political beliefs: A parametric fMRI study , 2009, Social neuroscience.

[48]  Arnaud D'Argembeau,et al.  Remembering pride and shame: Self-enhancement and the phenomenology of autobiographical memory , 2008, Memory.

[49]  Jeffrey D. Green,et al.  Forgotten but not gone: the recall and recognition of self-threatening memories , 2008 .

[50]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Adaptive Memory The Comparative Value of Survival Processing , 2022 .

[51]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[52]  I. Jentzsch,et al.  Seeing yourself in a positive light: Brain correlates of the self-positivity bias , 2007, Brain Research.

[53]  John J. Skowronski,et al.  Interfering With Inferential, But Not Associative, Processes Underlying Spontaneous Trait Inference , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[54]  Michael Ross,et al.  Group Identification and Historical Memory , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[55]  Josefa N. S. Pandeirada,et al.  Adaptive memory: survival processing enhances retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Daniel Lundqvist,et al.  Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention , 2005 .

[57]  Jeffrey D. Green,et al.  What I Don't Recall Can't Hurt Me: Information Negativity Versus Information Inconsistency As Determinants of Memorial Self-defense , 2004 .

[58]  S. Taylor,et al.  Extended Amygdala and Emotional Salience: A PET Activation Study of Positive and Negative Affect , 2003, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[59]  Jeffrey D. Green,et al.  On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  K. Ochsner,et al.  Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  The self-reference effect in memory: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[62]  R. Wyer,et al.  Individual Differences in Person Memory: The Role of Sociopolitical Ideology and In-Group Versus Out-Group Membership in Responses to Socially Relevant Behavior , 1996 .

[63]  S. Klein,et al.  Development and Representation of Personality Impressions , 1994 .

[64]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[65]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Effects of information content and evaluative extremity on positivity and negativity biases , 1993 .

[66]  Charles P. Thompson,et al.  Social memory in everyday life: Recall of self-events and other-events. , 1991 .

[67]  J. J. Seta,et al.  Identifying the sources of social actions: The role of source cues in person memory. , 1990 .

[68]  G. Peeters,et al.  Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Evaluations: The Distinction Between Affective and Informational Negativity Effects , 1990 .

[69]  S. Klein,et al.  The nature of self-referent encoding: The contributions of elaborative and organizational processes. , 1988 .

[70]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes , 1980 .

[71]  Stephen G. Gilligan,et al.  Remembering information related to one's self ☆ , 1979 .

[72]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  H. Markus Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .