Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of two computer based decision aids on decisional conflict and mode of delivery among pregnant women with a previous caesarean section. DESIGN Randomised trial, conducted from May 2004 to August 2006. SETTING Four maternity units in south west England, and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS 742 pregnant women with one previous lower segment caesarean section and delivery expected at >or=37 weeks. Non-English speakers were excluded. INTERVENTIONS Usual care: standard care given by obstetric and midwifery staff. Information programme: women navigated through descriptions and probabilities of clinical outcomes for mother and baby associated with planned vaginal birth, elective caesarean section, and emergency caesarean section. Decision analysis: mode of delivery was recommended based on utility assessments performed by the woman combined with probabilities of clinical outcomes within a concealed decision tree. Both interventions were delivered via a laptop computer after brief instructions from a researcher. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Total score on decisional conflict scale, and mode of delivery. RESULTS Women in the information programme (adjusted difference -6.2, 95% confidence interval -8.7 to -3.7) and the decision analysis (-4.0, -6.5 to -1.5) groups had reduced decisional conflict compared with women in the usual care group. The rate of vaginal birth was higher for women in the decision analysis group compared with the usual care group (37% v 30%, adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 0.94 to 2.14), but the rates were similar in the information programme and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids can help women who have had a previous caesarean section to decide on mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. The decision analysis approach might substantially affect national rates of caesarean section. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84367722.

[1]  A. Montgomery.  Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth Induction of Labour versus Expectant Monitoring in Women with Pregnancy Induced Hypertension or Mild Preeclampsia at Term: the Hypitat Trial , 2022 .

[2]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Decision‐making about mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: development and piloting of two computer‐based decision aids , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[3]  F. Chervenak,et al.  Decision-making about caesarean delivery , 2006, The Lancet.

[4]  J B Saunders,et al.  Making choices. , 1998, Drug and alcohol review.

[5]  Angela Coulter,et al.  Paternalism or partnership? , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  T. Marteau,et al.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). , 1992, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[7]  Amiram Gafni,et al.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  Clare L Emmett,et al.  Women’s experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Decision analysis in patient care , 2001, The Lancet.

[10]  T. Peters,et al.  A factorial randomised controlled trial of decision analysis and an information video plus leaflet for newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  S. Sur,et al.  Does discussion of possible scar rupture influence preferred mode of delivery after a caesarean section? , 2005, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[12]  T. Lavender,et al.  Why women choose to have a repeat caesarean section , 2005 .

[13]  G. Elwyn,et al.  One hundred years ago: Should milk be boiled? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  M. Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Decisions , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  Aileen Clarke,et al.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Jenny Hewison,et al.  Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial , 2004, Prenatal diagnosis.

[17]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.