Performance comparison of network layouts with mobile users under different resource scheduling techniques in downlink LTE

LTE-A addresses the challenges of coverage block holes and increase in user density with new features, such as small cell and femto cell. Small cell can be an inexpensive substitute to macro cell in coverage depleted areas. In contrast, heterogeneous network using femto cells with its ubiquitous coverage, can deliver high-speed data. Resource scheduling algorithm has an important role in determining the overall system performance. Several schedulers are available whose performance ranges from maximizing UE throughput to achieving the best fairness. UE mobility significantly affects the performance of different network topologies and various scheduling algorithms. In this paper, we have evaluated and compared various LTE downlink performance parameters between small cell network and heterogeneous network to conclude which type of network deployment is best suited for mobile users and dense urban environment under different scheduling schemes.

[1]  Mario García Lozano,et al.  Link abstraction models based on mutual information for LTE downlink , 2010 .

[2]  Xiaojun Lin,et al.  Gibbs-sampling-based optimization for the deployment of small cells in 3G heterogeneous networks , 2013, 2013 11th International Symposium and Workshops on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[3]  Holger Claussen,et al.  On femto deployment architectures and macrocell offloading benefits in joint macro-femto deployments , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Morten Tolstrup Indoor Radio Planning: A Practical Guide for 2G, 3G and 4G , 2015 .

[5]  H. M-H.,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEDULING TECHNIQUES IN LONG TERM EVOLUTION , 2013 .

[6]  Ivica Kostanic Performance Evaluation of Proportional Fairness Scheduling in LTE , 2013 .

[7]  Magnus Almgren,et al.  A fading-insensitive performance metric for a unified link quality model , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[8]  Stefania Sesia,et al.  LTE - The UMTS Long Term Evolution, Second Edition , 2011 .

[9]  Salman AlQahtani,et al.  Performance Modeling and Evaluation of Novel Scheduling Algorithm for LTE Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications.

[10]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Ying Wang,et al.  Average rate updating mechanism in proportional fair scheduler for HDR , 2004, GLOBECOM.

[12]  Mohammad T. Kawser,et al.  Performance Comparison between Round Robin andProportional Fair Scheduling Methods for LTE , 2012 .

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Femtocells: Past, Present, and Future , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Tara Ali-Yahiya,et al.  Understanding LTE and its Performance , 2011 .