Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) for Truck Platooning: Operational Concept Alternatives

Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) provides an intermediate step toward a longer-term vision of trucks operating in closely-coupled automated platoons. There are important distinctions between CACC and automated truck platooning. First, with CACC, only truck speed control will be automated, using vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication to supplement forward sensors. The drivers will still be responsible for actively steering the vehicle, lane keeping, and monitoring roadway and traffic conditions. Second, while truck platooning systems have relied on a Constant Distance Gap (CDG) control strategy, CACC has relied on a Constant-Time Gap (CTG) control strategy, where the distance between vehicles is proportional to the speed. For these reasons, a series of trucks using CACC is referred to as a string, rather than a platoon. This report mainly focuses on describing the various CACC operational concept alternatives at the level of individual vehicles, local groups of vehicles and their drivers, and which alternatives should be employed in this research project. These operational concepts can be broken into four categories: string formation, steady-state cruising, string split maneuvers, and faults or abnormal operating conditions.

[1]  Ellen van Nunen,et al.  Cooperative Competition for Future Mobility , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Shin Kato,et al.  An automated truck platoon for energy saving , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Javier Sanchez,et al.  Safe Road Trains for the Environment (SARTRE): Validation of SARTRE Platoon Service and the SARTRE HMI , 2012 .

[4]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  A Comparision of Spacing and Headway Control Laws for Automatically Controlled Vehicles1 , 1994 .

[5]  Kimihiko Nakano,et al.  Analysis on Behaviors of a Driver in the System Failure in Forming Automatic Platooning of Trucks from Manual Driving , 2012 .

[6]  Seungyong Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Safety of Automatic Platoon-Driving with Improved Brake System , 2012 .

[7]  Fred Browand,et al.  Fuel Saving Achieved in the Field Test of Two Tandem Trucks , 2004 .

[8]  G. R. Janssen,et al.  Truck platooning: driving the future of transportation , 2015 .

[9]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Hiroaki Sato,et al.  An Experimental Study on Appropriate Distance for Driver on Platooning -- Relationship Driver's Feature, Distance and Benefit , 2012 .

[11]  Steven E Schladover Review of the State of Development of Advanced Vehicle Control Systems (AVCS) , 1995 .

[12]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  An experimental study on the fuel reduction potential of heavy duty vehicle platooning , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  COOPERATIVE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (CACC) DEFINITIONS AND OPERATING CONCEPTS , 2015 .

[14]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  Coordinated route optimization for heavy-duty vehicle platoons , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).

[15]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Driver Acceptance of Following Gap Settings Less than One Second , 2010 .

[16]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  A Distributed Framework for Coordinated Heavy-Duty Vehicle Platooning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Jeroen Ploeg,et al.  Analysis and design of controllers for cooperative and automated driving , 2014 .

[18]  Karl Henrik Johansson,et al.  When is it Fuel Efficient for a Heavy Duty Vehicle to Catch Up With a Platoon , 2013 .

[19]  Javier Sanchez,et al.  Safe Road Trains for Environment: Human Factors' Aspects in Dual Mode Transport Systems , 2010 .