Main Achievements of the Multidisciplinary SINAPS@ Research Project: Towards an Integrated Approach to Perform Seismic Safety Analysis of Nuclear Facilities
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Rice. Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .
[2] T. Caughey,et al. Classical Normal Modes in Damped Linear Dynamic Systems , 1960 .
[3] J. Millis. Challenges ahead , 1998, Nature.
[4] R. Clough,et al. Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .
[5] E. Vanmarcke. On the Distribution of the First-Passage Time for Normal Stationary Random Processes , 1975 .
[6] J. P. Wolf,et al. Effects of horizontally propagating waves on the response of structures with a soft first storey , 1981 .
[7] John P. Wolf,et al. Response of a nuclear power plant on aseismic bearings to horizontally propagating waves , 1983 .
[8] James M. Kelly,et al. Seismic response of heavily damped base isolation systems , 1993 .
[9] Manolis Papadrakakis,et al. Earthquake simulator testing of pounding between adjacent buildings , 1995 .
[10] Andre Filiatrault,et al. Analytical prediction of experimental building pounding , 1995 .
[11] D. Komatitsch,et al. The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[12] James M. Kelly,et al. The role of damping in seismic isolation , 1999 .
[13] F. Ragueneau. Fonctionnement dynamique des structures en béton : influence des comportements hystériques locaux , 1999 .
[14] F. Cotton,et al. NEW EMPIRICAL RESPONSE SPECTRAL ATTENUATION LAWS FOR MODERATE EUROPEAN EARTHQUAKES , 2003 .
[15] Jinkook Kim,et al. Evaluation of equivalent damping ratio of a structure with added dampers , 2004 .
[16] John F. Hall,et al. Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping , 2006 .
[17] F. Charney. Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures , 2008 .
[18] K. Campbell,et al. NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .
[19] Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames – Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties , 2010 .
[20] D. Clouteau,et al. On a hybrid Laplace-time domain approach to dynamic interaction problems , 2012 .
[21] Pierre Jehel,et al. Initial versus tangent stiffness‐based Rayleigh damping in inelastic time history seismic analyses , 2013, 1309.2741.
[22] Jack W. Baker,et al. Conditional spectrum‐based ground motion selection. Part I: Hazard consistency for risk‐based assessments , 2013 .
[23] Benjamin Richard,et al. Experimental characterization and modeling of energy dissipation in reinforced concrete beams subjected to cyclic loading , 2013 .
[24] A. Correia,et al. Seismic Energy Dissipation in Inelastic Frames: Understanding State-of-the-Practice Damping Models , 2013 .
[25] Dimitri Komatitsch,et al. The spectral-element method in seismology , 2013 .
[26] Khalid M. Mosalam,et al. PEER Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Methodology, Revisited , 2013 .
[27] Irmela Zentner,et al. A procedure for simulating synthetic accelerograms compatible with correlated and conditional probabilistic response spectra , 2014 .
[28] K. Pilakoutas,et al. Seismic strengthening of severely damaged beam-column RC joints using CFRP , 2014 .
[29] Farhang Ostadan,et al. Consistent site-response/soil-structure interaction analysis and evaluation , 2014 .
[30] Robert Cybulski,et al. A Timoshenko finite element straight beam with internal degrees of freedom , 2015 .
[31] F. Scherbaum,et al. Development of a Response Spectral Ground‐Motion Prediction Equation (GMPE) for Seismic‐Hazard Analysis from Empirical Fourier Spectral and Duration Models , 2015 .
[32] H. Dumontet,et al. Dissipative Homogenised Reinforced Concrete (DHRC) constitutive model dedicated to reinforced concrete plates under seismic loading , 2015 .
[33] David Néron,et al. Time‐space PGD for the rapid solution of 3D nonlinear parametrized problems in the many‐query context , 2015 .
[34] P. Kotronis,et al. A novel multi-fiber Timoshenko beam finite element formulation with embedded discontinuities to describe reinforced concrete failure under static loadings , 2016 .
[35] M. Vitse. Réduction de modèle pour l'analyse paramétrique de l'endommagement dans les structures en béton armé , 2016 .
[36] Benjamin Richard,et al. SMART 2013: Experimental and numerical assessment of the dynamic behavior by shaking table tests of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure subjected to high intensity ground motions , 2016 .
[37] F. Lopez-Caballero,et al. THE SINAPS@ FRENCH RESEARCH PROJECT: FIRST LESSONS OF AN INTEGRATED SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT FOR NUCLEAR PLANTS SAFETY , 2016 .
[38] L. Bollinger,et al. Evidence for the release of long‐term tectonic strain stored in continental interiors through intraplate earthquakes , 2016 .
[39] Stéphane Grange,et al. A multifiber beam model coupling torsional warping and damage for reinforced concrete structures , 2016 .
[40] Thomas Heitz,et al. Nonlinear local behaviours and numerical modeling of damping in civil engineering structures in dynamic , 2017 .
[41] Benjamin Richard,et al. Strong discontinuity analysis of a class of anisotropic continuum damage constitutive models – Part II: Concrete material application , 2017 .
[42] Panagiotis Kotronis,et al. Toward an integrated seismic risk assessment for nuclear safety improving current French methodologies through the SINAPS@ research project , 2017 .
[43] Ioannis Politopoulos,et al. Influential Structural Parameters of Pounding between Buildings during Earthquakes , 2017 .
[44] E. Faccioli,et al. An Overview of the SIGMA Research Project: A European Approach to Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2017 .
[45] P. Bard,et al. Analysis of rotation sensor data from the SINAPS@ Kefalonia (Greece) post-seismic experiment—link to surface geology and wavefield characteristics , 2017, Earth, Planets and Space.
[46] A. Borovkov. On the distribution of the first passage time of a random walk to an arbitrary remote boundary , 2017 .
[47] F. Scherbaum,et al. Stochastic source, path and site attenuation parameters and associated variabilities for shallow crustal European earthquakes , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[48] P.-Y. Bard,et al. Derivation of consistent hard rock (1000 < VS < 3000 m/s) GMPEs from surface and down-hole recordings: analysis of KiK-net data , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[49] E. Faccioli,et al. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for South-Eastern France , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[50] Enrico Zio,et al. Adaptive artificial neural networks for seismic fragility analysis , 2017, 2017 2nd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS).
[51] V. Fernandes,et al. DYNAMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION MODELING STRATEGIES APPLIED TO KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT CASE-STUDY , 2017 .
[52] M. Causse,et al. Near-Fault Broadband Ground Motion Simulations Using Empirical Green’s Functions: Application to the Upper Rhine Graben (France–Germany) Case Study , 2017, Pure and Applied Geophysics.
[53] Sara Touhami,et al. STRUCTURE-SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF NUPEC TEST CASES , 2017 .
[54] D. Sicilia,et al. Pleistocene Involutions and Patterned Ground in France: Examples and Analysis Using a GIS Database , 2017 .
[55] M. Balmaseda,et al. A discrete anisotropic damage constitutive law with an enhanced mixed-mode kinematics: Application to RC shear walls , 2017 .
[56] P. Bard,et al. Spatial coherency analysis of seismic ground motions from a rock site dense array implemented during the Kefalonia 2014 aftershock sequence , 2017 .
[57] Y. Sieffert,et al. ENHANCEMENT OF MULTIFIBER BEAM ELEMENTS IN THE CASE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES FOR TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE LATERAL CONFINEMENT OF CONCRETE DUE TO STIRRUP , 2017 .
[58] M. Cara,et al. The French seismic CATalogue (FCAT-17) , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[59] S. Erlicher,et al. Stress resultant nonlinear constitutive model for cracked reinforced concrete panels , 2017 .
[60] Zio Enrico,et al. Computation of Seismic Fragility Curves Using Artificial Neural Network Metamodels , 2017 .
[61] C. Berge-Thierry,et al. Challenges Ahead for Nuclear Facility Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Assessment in France: The Alternative Energies and the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) Vision , 2017, Pure and Applied Geophysics.
[62] P. Traversa,et al. Exploration tree approach to estimate historical earthquakes Mw and depth, test cases from the French past seismicity , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[63] Ioannis Politopoulos,et al. Sensitivity analysis of pounding between adjacent structures , 2018 .
[64] GLRC_HEGIS GLOBAL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR RC WALLS AND SLABS FOR SEISMIC NONLINEAR STRUCTURAL ANALYSES , 2018 .
[65] James R. Gingery,et al. Prenolin: International benchmark on 1D nonlinear: Site-response analysis—validation phase exercise , 2018 .
[66] P. Kotronis,et al. A generalized Timoshenko beam with embedded rotation discontinuity , 2018, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design.
[67] R. Paolucci,et al. On the effect of the 3-D regional geology on the seismic design of critical structures: the case of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant , 2018 .
[68] P. Bard,et al. The ARGONET (Greece) Seismic Observatory: An Accelerometric Vertical Array and Its Data , 2018, Seismological Research Letters.
[69] G. Ameri,et al. Intensity predictive attenuation models calibrated in Mw for metropolitan France , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
[70] Marie-Cécile Robin-Boudaoud,et al. Progress in the understanding and modelling of components that could drive the overall fragility of a nuclear power plant , 2018 .
[71] I. Zentner. Use of RVT for Computation of In-Structure Response Spectra and Peak Responses and Comparison to Time History and Response Spectrum Analysis , 2018, Earthquake Spectra.
[72] R. Paolucci,et al. Broad-band 3-D earthquake simulation at nuclear site by an all-embracing source-to-structure approach , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.
[73] Levent Isbiliroglu,et al. Strategy for Selecting Input Ground Motion for Structural Seismic Demand Analysis , 2018 .
[74] Y. Fukushima. SEISMIC HAZARDS IN SITE EVALUATION FOR NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS Draft Safety Guide DS507 , 2018 .
[75] M. Causse,et al. Radiation Patterns Control the Near‐Source Ground‐Motion Saturation Effect , 2018, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[76] Benjamin Richard,et al. Dissipations in reinforced concrete components: Static and dynamic experimental identification strategy , 2018 .
[77] B. Delouis,et al. Optimization of a Simulation Code Coupling Extended Source (k−2) and Empirical Green’s Functions: Application to the Case of the Middle Durance Fault , 2019, Pure and Applied Geophysics.
[78] David Néron,et al. Dealing with a nonlinear material behavior and its variability through PGD models: Application to reinforced concrete structures , 2019, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design.
[79] T. Bodin,et al. Quantifying location uncertainties in seismicity catalogues: application to the Pyrenees , 2018, Journal of Seismology.
[80] Benjamin Richard,et al. Sensitivity of engineering demand parameters as a function of structural typology and assessment method , 2019, Nuclear Engineering and Design.
[81] M Bertin,et al. Using Bayesian model averaging to improve ground motion predictions , 2020 .
[82] Irmela Zentner,et al. Seismic Fragility Curve Assessment Based on Synthetic Ground Motions with Conditional Spectra , 2019, Pure and Applied Geophysics.
[83] D. Clouteau,et al. A holistic approach of numerical analysis of the geology effects on ground motion prediction: Argostoli site test , 2020, Journal of Seismology.
[84] Andrés Guzmán,et al. Earthquake Simulator , 2021, 2021 IEEE 5th Colombian Conference on Automatic Control (CCAC).