The following application o f Axiomatic Design strives to provide a framework for the design o f the organization o f product development. It follows current research to expand the current theory o f Axiomatic Design to complex systems, like software design [Suh (1999)] or the design of manufacturing system [Suh/Cochran/Lima (1998)], to name a few. The development o f new products has always been an essential challenge as it reflects not only the evolution o f the needs and wants o f the customers, but also the change o f the entire corporate environment and o f the company itself. Implications deriving from increased competition, more fragmented and demanding markets and an acceleration o f technology change have alternated the approach towards designing and managing the product development function within a corporate entity [Clark/Fujimoto (1991)]. Whereas the initial intention o f Axiomatic Design is to provide a general basis for the design process, the Product Development System Decomposition (PDS) strives to model the product development organization as a whole, consisting o f individual information processes and overall organizational functionality and characteristics. However, the decomposition requires to clarify the context and linkage o f the PDS within the corporate system. In alignment to Axiomatic Design, the PDS is derived from top-level functional requirements (FRs) and design parameters (DPs), which reflect long-term decisions linked to corporate strategy and corporate system design. Due to the inconsistencies o f current definitions it in addition appears necessary to redefine the scope and content o f product development. The major FRs for the PDS are then linked to fundamental tasks within organizational theory, e.g. the provision o f a sufficient level o f functional expertise by differentiation and the continuing growth in productivity by aligning and adjusting the individual design activities by integration [Lawrence/Lorsch (1967), Sobek (1997)]. Beyond such high-level FRs the PDS is decomposed to a sufficient level which is necessary for a direct application and the continuous control o f the product development system.
[1]
A. Pearson.
Managing New Product Innovations.
,
1989
.
[2]
David S. Cochran,et al.
The Production System Design and Deployment Framework
,
1999
.
[3]
Kim B. Clark,et al.
Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto
,
1991
.
[4]
P. Lawrence,et al.
Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration
,
1967
.
[5]
David S. Cochran,et al.
Manufacturing System Design
,
1998
.
[6]
Gerhard Pahl,et al.
Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung. 4. neubearb. Aufl
,
1997
.
[7]
Durward Kenneth Sobek.
Principles that shape product development systems : a Toyota-Chrysler comparison
,
1997
.
[8]
W. Souder,et al.
An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D Personnel in new product development projects
,
1990
.
[9]
Michael Burda,et al.
Revolutionizing product development
,
1993
.
[10]
David Robertson,et al.
Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry
,
1992
.
[11]
Jay R. Galbraith.
Designing Complex Organizations
,
1973
.
[12]
Gerhard Pahl,et al.
Konstrucktionslehre : Methoden und Anwendung
,
1993
.