Surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane: a four-year clinical follow-up report.

OBJECTIVES The present case series aimed at investigating the 4-year clinical outcomes following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis lesions using either a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane (NBM+CM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients suffering from moderate peri-implantitis (n=20 intrabony defects) were randomly treated with (1) access flap surgery (AFS) and the application of NHA (n=9), or with AFS and the application of NBM+CM (n=11). Clinical and radiographic (R) parameters were recorded at baseline (R) and after 36 and 48 (R) months of non-submerged healing. RESULTS One patient from the NBM+CM group was discontinued from the study due to severe pus formation at 36 months. Compared with NHA, the application of NBM+CM resulted in higher mean PD reductions (NBM+CM: 2.5 +/- 0.9 mm versus NHA: 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm) and clinical attachment-level gains (NBM+CM: 2.0 +/- 1.0 mm versus NHA: 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm) at 48 months. A radiographic bone fill was observed for five sites in the NHA group, and eight sites in the NBM+CM group. CONCLUSION While the application of NBM+CM resulted in clinical improvements over a period of 4 years, the long-term outcome obtained with NHA without barrier membrane must be considered as poor.

[1]  Nicola U Zitzmann,et al.  Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  Noel Claffey,et al.  Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  Noel Claffey,et al.  Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[4]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Peri-implant diseases: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[5]  J. Lessem,et al.  Mechanical and repeated antimicrobial therapy using a local drug delivery system in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a randomized clinical trial. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[6]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Two-year clinical results following treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[7]  A. Roos-Jansåker,et al.  Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis using a bone substitute with or without a resorbable membrane: a prospective cohort study. , 2007, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[8]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part II: radiographic outcome. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Nonsurgical treatment of moderate and advanced periimplantitis lesions: a controlled clinical study , 2006, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[11]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Influence of different treatment approaches on non-submerged and submerged healing of ligature induced peri-implantitis lesions: an experimental study in dogs. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Clinical and histological healing pattern of peri‐implantitis lesions following non‐surgical treatment with an Er:YAG laser , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[13]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Healing of intrabony peri-implantitis defects following application of a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) or a bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) in combination with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide). A case series. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  J. Lessem,et al.  Topical minocycline microspheres versus topical chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to mechanical debridement of incipient peri-implant infections: a randomized clinical trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[15]  M. Chiapasco,et al.  Therapy of peri‐implantitis with resective surgery , 2005 .

[16]  F. Schwarz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[17]  A. Lussi,et al.  Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  M. Tonetti,et al.  Long-term tooth survival following regenerative treatment of intrabony defects. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[19]  F. Khoury,et al.  Surgical therapy of peri-implant disease: a 3-year follow-up study of cases treated with 3 different techniques of bone regeneration. , 2001, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Evaluation of guided bone regeneration and/or bone grafts in the treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis defects: a morphometric study in dogs. , 2000, The Journal of oral implantology.

[21]  R. Elswick,et al.  Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[22]  N. Lang,et al.  Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. , 1994, Periodontology 2000.

[23]  H Löe,et al.  The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. , 1967, Journal of periodontology.