Valuing the environmental impacts of wind power : a choice experiment approach

There exists a political goal in Sweden to increase the use of renewable energy, and wind power seems to be a favorable choice from an environmental perspective. Although the public generally expre ...

[1]  N. Hanley,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment , 1998 .

[2]  N. Hanley,et al.  Preferences, information and biodiversity preservation , 1995 .

[3]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[4]  J. Quiggin,et al.  Respondents To Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers Or Citizens? - Reply , 1995 .

[5]  R. Wiser.  Green power marketing: increasing customer demand for renewable energy , 1998 .

[6]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[7]  M. Sagoff,et al.  The Economy of the Earth: Acknowledgments , 2007 .

[8]  R. Bere.  The African elephant , 1966 .

[9]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[10]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL , 1982 .

[11]  C. Russell,et al.  Public and private preferences for environmental quality in Denmark , 2000 .

[12]  G. Harrison.  Valuing public goods with the contingent valuation method: A critique of kahneman and knetsch , 1992 .

[13]  A. Sen,et al.  Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory , 1977 .

[14]  Clive L. Spash,et al.  Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation , 1997 .

[15]  Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser,et al.  Miljø- og Energiministeriet , 2001 .

[16]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[17]  W. Hanemann.  Discrete-Continuous Models of Consumer Demand , 1984 .

[18]  C. Russell,et al.  Searching for evidence of alternative preferences, public as opposed to private , 2003 .

[19]  J. Bennett,et al.  Remnant Vegetation and Wetlands Protection: Non-market Valuation , 2001 .

[20]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies , 1999 .

[21]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation , 1996 .

[22]  Thomas Sundqvist,et al.  Power generation choice in the presence of environmental externalities , 2002 .

[23]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[24]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[25]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Using Choice Experiments for Non-Market Valuation , 2001 .

[26]  P. Urwin,et al.  Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market , 2001 .

[27]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[28]  Nick Hanley,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain , 2002 .

[29]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL VALUATION, DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING INSTITUTIONS , 1997 .

[31]  Eco-democracy : a green challenge to democratic theory and practice , 1998 .

[32]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[33]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[34]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .