View-invariance learning in object recognition by pigeons depends on error-driven associative learning processes
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Schyns,et al. Nonaccidental Properties Underlie Shape Recognition in Mammalian and Nonmammalian Vision , 2007, Current Biology.
[2] J. DiCarlo,et al. Unsupervised Natural Visual Experience Rapidly Reshapes Size-Invariant Object Representation in Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.
[3] Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al. Attention-Gated Reinforcement Learning of Internal Representations for Classification , 2005, Neural Computation.
[4] B A Williams,et al. Conditioned Reinforcement: Experimental and Theoretical Issues , 1994, The Behavior analyst.
[5] Frédéric Gosselin,et al. Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.
[6] Fabian A. Soto,et al. Visual object categorization in birds and primates: Integrating behavioral, neurobiological, and computational evidence within a “general process” framework , 2011, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.
[7] R. Woodworth,et al. Woodworth & Schlosberg's Experimental psychology , 1972 .
[8] M. Tarr,et al. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.
[9] Ernest A. Lumsden,et al. Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations , 1977 .
[10] K. Haberlandt,et al. Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.
[11] Robbe L. T. Goris,et al. Invariance in Visual Object Recognition Requires Training: A Computational Argument , 2009, Frontiers in neuroscience.
[12] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[13] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[14] Aaron P Blaisdell,et al. Effect of reward probability on spatial and temporal variation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[15] D. W. Scott,et al. Multidimensional Density Estimation , 2005 .
[16] Michael J. Burke,et al. Averaging Correlations: Expected Values and Bias in Combined Pearson rs and Fisher's z Transformations , 1998 .
[17] Keiji Tanaka,et al. View‐invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.
[18] David D. Cox,et al. What response properties do individual neurons need to underlie position and clutter "invariant" object recognition? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.
[19] I. Biederman,et al. The pigeon's perception of depth-rotated shapes , 1999 .
[20] Jonas Rose,et al. Peck tracking: a method for localizing critical features within complex pictures for pigeons , 2009, Animal Cognition.
[21] I Biederman,et al. The pigeon's recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[22] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[23] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Pigeons and humans are more sensitive to nonaccidental than to metric changes in visual objects , 2008, Behavioural Processes.
[24] P. J. Green,et al. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .
[25] Nicole C Rust,et al. Ambiguity and invariance: two fundamental challenges for visual processing , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[26] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[27] A Friedman,et al. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[28] I. Biederman,et al. Effects of varying stimulus size on object recognition in pigeons. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[29] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[30] T. Poggio,et al. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.
[31] Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin,et al. Midbrain Dopamine Neurons Signal Preference for Advance Information about Upcoming Rewards , 2009, Neuron.
[32] N. Mackintosh. Overshadowing and stimulus intensity , 1976, Animal learning & behavior.
[33] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[34] S. Gerber,et al. Unsupervised Natural Experience Rapidly Alters Invariant Object Representation in Visual Cortex , 2008 .
[35] Irving Biederman,et al. Learning an object from multiple views enhances its recognition in an orthogonal rotational axis in pigeons , 2002, Vision Research.
[36] Fabian A. Soto,et al. Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model. , 2010, Psychological review.
[37] R. Vogels,et al. Effects of Category Learning on the Stimulus Selectivity of Macaque References , 2022 .
[38] Tomaso Poggio,et al. Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Science.
[39] E. Wasserman. STIMULUS-REINFORCER PREDICTIVENESS AND SELECTIVE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN PIGEONS ' , 1974 .
[40] David W. Scott,et al. Multivariate Density Estimation and Visualization , 2012 .
[41] Lloyd J. Frei,et al. Recent advances in operant conditioning technology: A versatile and affordable computerized touchscreen system , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[42] R. Pisacreta,et al. Matching of varying-size form stimuli in the pigeon , 1984 .
[43] Takeo Watanabe,et al. Perceptual learning rules based on reinforcers and attention , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[44] Olivier D. Faugeras,et al. A Constructive Mean-Field Analysis of Multi-Population Neural Networks with Random Synaptic Weights and Stochastic Inputs , 2008, Front. Comput. Neurosci..
[45] Robbe L. T. Goris,et al. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience Computational Neuroscience Neural Representations That Support Invariant Object Recognition , 2022 .
[46] I Biederman,et al. Seeing things from a different angle: the pigeon's recognition of single geons rotated in depth. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.
[47] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.
[48] L. Györfi,et al. Nonparametric entropy estimation. An overview , 1997 .
[49] John Cerella,et al. Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon , 1977, Pattern Recognit..
[50] I. Pavlov,et al. Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex , 2010, Annals of Neurosciences.
[51] I. Biederman,et al. Discrimination of geons by pigeons: The effects of variations in surface depiction , 2001 .
[52] John E. Hummel. Object Recognition , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.
[53] Thomas L. Griffiths,et al. Latent Features in Similarity Judgments: A Nonparametric Bayesian Approach , 2008, Neural Computation.
[54] Alinda Friedman,et al. Recognizing rotated views of objects: Interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[55] Roger N. Shepard,et al. Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. , 1979 .
[56] David D. Cox,et al. Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[57] S. Ullman. Object recognition and segmentation by a fragment-based hierarchy , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] Peter Földiák,et al. Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences , 1991, Neural Comput..
[59] Michael E Young,et al. Response variability in pigeons in a pavlovian task , 2010, Learning & behavior.
[60] J. Andrade-Cetto. Object Recognition , 2003 .
[61] Joel Z. Leibo,et al. Learning Generic Invariances in Object Recognition: Translation and Scale , 2010 .
[62] Marcia L. Spetch,et al. Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[63] Edmund T. Rolls,et al. Learning invariant object recognition in the visual system with continuous transformations , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.
[64] Thomas Serre,et al. A Theory of Object Recognition: Computations and Circuits in the Feedforward Path of the Ventral Stream in Primate Visual Cortex , 2005 .
[65] Vision Research , 1961, Nature.
[66] Thomas Serre,et al. A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[67] Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al. Slow Feature Analysis: Unsupervised Learning of Invariances , 2002, Neural Computation.
[68] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[69] I. Gauthier,et al. Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.