Especial skills: their emergence with massive amounts of practice.

Differing viewpoints concerning the specificity and generality of motor skill representations in memory were compared by contrasting versions of a skill having either extensive or minimal specific practice. In Experiments 1 and 2, skilled basketball players more accurately performed set shots at the foul line than would be predicted on the basis of the performance at the nearby locations, suggesting considerable specificity at this distance. This effect was replicated even when the lines on the court were obscured (in Experiment 2). However, the effect was absent when jump shots were executed in Experiment 3. The authors argue that massive levels of practice at 1 particular member of a class of actions produce specific effects that allow this skill to stand out from the other members of the class, giving it the status of an especial skill. Various theoretical views are proposed to account for the development of these skills.

[1]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[2]  N. A. Bernstein.  Dexterity and Its Development , 1996 .

[3]  Willem B. Verwey,et al.  Changes in the Incidental Context Impacts Search but not Loading of the Motor Buffer , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Wardrop.  Simpson's Paradox and the Hot Hand in Basketball , 1995 .

[5]  C. Wrisberg,et al.  A field test of the activity-set hypothesis for warm-up decrement in an open skill. , 1993, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[7]  L. Tremblay,et al.  Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  The activity-set hypothesis for warm-up decrement in a movement-speed task. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  C J Chamberlin,et al.  The memory representation of motor skills: a test of schema theory. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[10]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[11]  G. Parfitt,et al.  A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. , 1991, British journal of psychology.

[12]  C. Shea,et al.  Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation , 2005, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  R. Schmidt.  Motor Schema Theory after 27 Years: Reflections and Implications for a New Theory , 2003, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  R. Schmidt.  A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[15]  A E Patla,et al.  Speed-accuracy characteristics of saccadic eye movements. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  C. Myers.  Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[17]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Transfer of Movement Control in Motor Skill Learning , 1986 .

[18]  Roscoe Conkling Brown,et al.  Classical studies on physical activity , 1968 .

[19]  L Proteau,et al.  A Sensorimotor Basis for Motor Learning: Evidence Indicating Specificity of Practice , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  Merton Pa.  How we control the contraction of our muscles. , 1972 .

[21]  Herbert Kaufman,et al.  Individual differences and theory in a motor learning task. , 1955 .

[22]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  G. Stelmach.  Information processing in motor control and learning , 1978 .

[24]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[25]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Knowledge of performance and the learning of a closed motor skill. , 1979, Research quarterly.

[26]  E. Williams.  Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[27]  Willard S. Lotter.  Interrelationships among Reaction Times and Speeds of Movement in Different Limbs , 1960 .

[28]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Role of kinesthetic and spatialvisual abilities in perceptual-motor learning. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  C. Wrisberg,et al.  Reducing Warm-up Decrement in the Performance of the Tennis Serve , 1993 .

[30]  L. Proteau.  Sensory integration in the learning of an aiming task. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[31]  A. Anastasi.  Individual differences. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  J. A. Adams,et al.  Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit-rotor. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[33]  K. Lersten.  Transfer of movement components in a motor learning task. , 1968, Research quarterly.

[34]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Coding of learned kinesthetic location information. , 1980, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[35]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Sources of Inaccuracy in Rapid Movement , 1978 .

[36]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  J. C. Bachman.  Specificity vs. Generality in Learning and Performing Two Large Muscle Motor Tasks , 1961 .

[38]  K M Newell,et al.  Coordinating visual and kinaesthetic memory codes. , 1979, British journal of psychology.

[39]  R A Schmidt,et al.  The activity-set hypothesis for warm-up decrement. , 1971, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[40]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .

[41]  Albert V. Carron,et al.  The Home Advantage In Sport Competitions: A Literature Review , 1992 .

[42]  L Tremblay,et al.  Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[43]  L. Proteau.  Chapter 4 On The Specificity of Learning and the Role of Visual Information for Movement Control , 1992 .

[44]  J. A. Adams,et al.  The second facet of forgetting: a review of warmup decrement. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[46]  Herbert Weingartner,et al.  State-dependent accessibility of retrieval cues in the retention of a categorized list , 1975 .

[47]  M. Raibert.  Motor Control and Learning by the State Space Model , 1977 .

[48]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[49]  R A Abrams,et al.  Speed and accuracy of saccadic eye movements: characteristics of impulse variability in the oculomotor system. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  R. Magill,et al.  A note on schema and exemplar approaches to motor skill representation in memory. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[51]  C H Shea,et al.  Contextual dependencies in motor skills , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[52]  J. Chow,et al.  Specificity of Practice, Visual Information, and Intersegmental Dynamics in Rapid-Aiming Limb Movements , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[53]  Charles H Shea,et al.  Effect of Practice on Effector Independence , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[54]  Edward A. Bilodeau,et al.  Acquisition of Skill , 1967 .

[55]  G. Davies,et al.  Memory in context : context in memory , 1990 .

[56]  B. Walby.  Australian journals of scientific research , 1976, Nature.

[57]  J. Foley.  The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[58]  A. Tversky,et al.  The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  R A Schmidt,et al.  Further tests of the activity-set hypothesis for warm-up decrement. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  E. Thorndike,et al.  The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. II. The estimation of magnitudes. , 1901 .