Removal of simulated biofilm: a preclinical ergonomic comparison of instruments and operators

BackgroundPeriodontal scaling might cause musculoskeletal disorders, and scaling instruments might not only have different effectiveness and efficiency but also differ in their ergonomic properties. The present study assessed ergonomic working patterns of experienced (EO) and less experienced operators (LO) when using hand and powered devices for periodontal scaling and root planning.MethodsIn an experimental study using periodontally affected manikins, sonic (AIR), ultrasonic (TIG) and hand instruments (GRA) were used by 11 operators (7 EO/4 LO) during simulated supportive periodontal therapy. Using an electronic motion monitoring system, we objectively assessed the working frequency and positioning of hand, neck and head. Operators’ subjective evaluation of the instruments was recorded using a questionnaire.ResultsHand instruments were used with the lowest frequency (2.57 ± 1.08 s−1) but greatest wrist deviation (59.57 ± 53.94°). EO used instruments more specifically than LO, and generally worked more ergonomically, with less inclination of head and neck in both the frontal and sagittal planes, especially when using hand instruments. All groups found hand instruments more tiring and difficult to use than powered instruments.ConclusionRegardless of operators’ experience, powered instruments were used more ergonomically and were subjectively preferred compared to hand instruments.Clinical relevanceThe use of hand instruments has potential ergonomic disadvantages. However, with increasing experience, operators are able to recognise and mitigate possible risks.

[1]  S. C. Lea,et al.  Advances in power driven pocket/root instrumentation. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  S. McPhee,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors of hand problems and carpal tunnel syndrome among dental hygienists. , 2001, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[3]  R. Werner,et al.  Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome and upper extremity tendinitis among dental hygienists. , 2002, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[4]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Finger receptor dysfunction in dental technicians exposed to high-frequency vibration. , 1989, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health.

[5]  Hui Dong,et al.  The effects of finger rest positions on hand muscle load and pinch force in simulated dental hygiene work. , 2005, Journal of dental education.

[6]  P. Bartold,et al.  Use of the Vector scaling unit in supportive periodontal therapy: a subjective patient evaluation. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[7]  Falk Schwendicke,et al.  Subgingival instrumentation to remove simulated plaque in vitro: influence of operators’ experience and type of instrument , 2014, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[8]  T. Kocher,et al.  Effectiveness of subgingival instrumentation with power-driven instruments in the hands of experienced and inexperienced operators. A study on manikins. , 1997, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[9]  J. Wennström,et al.  A paradigm shift in mechanical biofilm management? Subgingival air polishing: a new way to improve mechanical biofilm management in the dental practice. , 2013, Quintessence international.

[10]  J B Bramson,et al.  Evaluating dental office ergonomic. Risk factors and hazards. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  Christine M Blue,et al.  A pilot study comparing the outcome of scaling/root planing with and without Perioscope™ technology. , 2013, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[12]  M. Cherniack,et al.  A pilot study of hand and arm musculoskeletal disorders in dental hygiene students. , 2003, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[13]  T. Lie,et al.  Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy. , 1977, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  E Milerad,et al.  Symptoms of the neck and upper extremities in dentists. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[15]  Hyo-Lyun Roh,et al.  Approach of Industrial Physical Therapy to Assessment of the Musculoskeletal System and Ergonomic Risk Factors of the Dental Hygienist , 2013, Journal of physical therapy science.

[16]  A. Hefti,et al.  An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[17]  Smith Em,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: contribution of flexor tendons. , 1977 .

[18]  D. Naik,et al.  Effects of ultrasonic scaling and hand-activated scaling on tactile sensitivity in dental hygiene students. , 2005, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[19]  A. Heinecke,et al.  A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[20]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. , 2003, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  D. Sonstegard,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: contribution of flexor tendons. , 1977, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  C. Schwahn,et al.  Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments. Part I: a training program to increase effectivity. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[23]  P. Dechow,et al.  Patients' perception of pain during ultrasonic debridement: a comparison between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers. , 2010, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[24]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Sensory perception in the hands of dentists. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[25]  L McAtamney,et al.  RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  C. Graetz,et al.  Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. , 2013, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  D. Rempel,et al.  The effects of periodontal curette handle weight and diameter on arm pain: a four-month randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[28]  W. Thomson,et al.  Self-reported occupational health of general dental practitioners. , 2009, Occupational medicine.

[29]  P. Harber,et al.  Work Environment and Occupational Health of Dental Hygienists: A Qualitative Assessment , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[30]  B. Smith,et al.  Root substance removal by scaling and root planing. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[31]  T Oberg,et al.  Musculoskeletal complaints in dental hygiene: a survey study from a Swedish county. , 1993, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[32]  J. Stoltenberg,et al.  Musculoskeletal pain among Minnesota dental hygienists. , 1990, Journal of dental hygiene : JDH.

[33]  R Lundström,et al.  Effects of local vibration transmitted from ultrasonic devices on vibrotactile perception in the hands of therapists. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[34]  R. Genco,et al.  Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. , 2000, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  P. Schmidlin,et al.  Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation. , 2001, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[36]  T. Morse,et al.  Musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and shoulder in the dental professions. , 2010, Work.

[37]  C. Schwahn,et al.  Learning root debridement with curettes and power-driven instruments in vitro: the role of operator motivation and self-assessment. , 2002, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[38]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Neuropathy in female dental personnel exposed to high frequency vibrations. , 1995, Occupational and environmental medicine.