On the Thomson effect in thermoelectric power devices

Abstract Most thermoelectric device modeling neglects the non-linear Thomson effect in order to develop a closed-form solution to the governing heat equation. This simplified solution is beneficial for system modeling and optimization when more intensive numerical techniques are prohibitive. An averaged Seebeck coefficient is often used in conjunction with the closed-form solution to incorporate approximately the effect of this neglected term (termed the “standard model”). While the standard model has been accepted in the past for materials under small temperature gradients and relatively constant Seebeck coefficient, there has not been a systematic assessment of validity of this modeling approach, especially for emerging materials and large temperature gradients. This work rigorously demonstrates the accuracy and limitations of the standard model through analytical derivation and comparison with an efficient numerical solution. It is proven that the standard model produces the exact module output power if an integral-averaged Seebeck coefficient is used, and also that the standard model provides a reasonably-accurate estimation of module efficiency, despite its limiting assumptions. These findings prove that the standard model in fact incorporates the Thomson effect with sufficient accuracy that it may be used to simulate and optimize thermoelectric systems as an alternative to computationally expensive numerical simulations.

[1]  Terry J. Hendricks,et al.  Integrated dual-cycle energy recovery using thermoelectric conversion and an organic Rankine bottoming cycle , 2011 .

[2]  Daehyun Wee,et al.  Analysis of thermoelectric energy conversion efficiency with linear and nonlinear temperature dependence in material properties , 2011 .

[3]  M. Hodes One-dimensional analysis of thermoelectric modules , 2004, The Ninth Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena In Electronic Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37543).

[4]  Zijun Yan,et al.  The influence of Thomson effect on the maximum power output and maximum efficiency of a thermoelectric generator , 1996 .

[5]  L. Reindl,et al.  New Physical Model for Thermoelectric Generators , 2009 .

[6]  S. W. Angrist Direct energy conversion , 1976 .

[7]  M. Hodes,et al.  On one-dimensional analysis of thermoelectric modules (TEMs) , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies.

[8]  R. Buist,et al.  Calculation of thermoelectric power generation performance using finite element analysis , 1997, XVI ICT '97. Proceedings ICT'97. 16th International Conference on Thermoelectrics (Cat. No.97TH8291).

[9]  Emil Sandoz-Rosado,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Thermoelectric Modules and Comparison with Theoretical Models for Power Generation , 2009 .

[10]  Osamu Yamashita,et al.  Effect of linear temperature dependence of thermoelectric properties on energy conversion efficiency , 2008 .

[11]  D. Rowe,et al.  Thermoelectric figure-of-merit under large temperature differences , 2004 .

[12]  G. Vineyard,et al.  Semiconductor Thermoelements and Thermoelectric Cooling , 1957 .

[13]  Gao Min,et al.  Design theory of thermoelectric modules for electrical power generation , 1996 .

[14]  D. Crane,et al.  An Introduction to System-Level, Steady-State and Transient Modeling and Optimization of High-Power-Density Thermoelectric Generator Devices Made of Segmented Thermoelectric Elements , 2011 .

[15]  G. Jackson,et al.  Optimization of cross flow heat exchangers for thermoelectric waste heat recovery , 2004 .