A new method for wide frequency range dynamic olfactory stimulation and characterization.

Sensory receptors often receive strongly dynamic, or time varying, inputs in their natural environments. Characterizing their dynamic properties requires control and measurement of the stimulus over a frequency range that equals or exceeds the receptor response. Techniques for dynamic stimulation of olfactory receptors have lagged behind other major sensory modalities because of difficulties in controlling and measuring the concentration of odorants at the receptor. We present a new method for delivering olfactory stimulation that gives linear, low-noise, wide frequency range control of odorant concentration. A servo-controlled moving bead of silicone elastomer occludes the tip of a Pasteur pipette that releases odorant plus tracer gas into a flow tube. Tracer gas serves as a surrogate indicator of odorant concentration and is measured by a photoionization detector. The system has well-defined time-dependent behavior (frequency response and impulse response functions) and gives predictable control of odorant over a significant volume surrounding the animal. The frequency range of the system is about 0-100 Hz. System characterization was based on random (white noise) stimulation, which allows more rapid and accurate estimation of dynamic behavior than deterministic signals such as sinusoids or step functions. Frequency response functions of Drosophila electroantennograms stimulated by fruit odors were used to demonstrate a typical application of the system.

[1]  Andrey Rzhetsky,et al.  A Spatial Map of Olfactory Receptor Expression in the Drosophila Antenna , 1999, Cell.

[2]  C Giovanni Galizia,et al.  Temporal integrity of an airborne odor stimulus is greatly affected by physical aspects of the odor delivery system. , 2006, Chemical senses.

[3]  Håkan Johansson,et al.  Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  A. S. French,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  S. Maddrell,et al.  Amino acids modulate ion transport and fluid secretion by insect Malpighian tubules , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Neuronal Systems , 1999 .

[7]  P Z Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear analysis and synthesis of receptive-field responses in the catfish retina. I. Horizontal cell leads to ganglion cell chain. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Tukey,et al.  An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series , 1965 .

[9]  A. V. Holden,et al.  The estimation of the frequency response function of a mechanoreceptor , 1972, Kybernetik.

[10]  Bill S Hansson,et al.  Novel natural ligands for Drosophila olfactory receptor neurones , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[11]  J. Kuster,et al.  Sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor: extended bandwidth measurements and sensitivity to simulus strenght , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of Limulus , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Integrating the Molecular and Cellular Basis of Odor Coding in the Drosophila Antenna , 2003, Neuron.

[14]  A. S. French,et al.  Acetylcholine receptors in spider peripheral mechanosensilla , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  T. Baker,et al.  Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code , 2001, Nature.

[16]  C. Loudon,et al.  Electroantennographic resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in two species of moths with bipectinate antennae. , 2005, Chemical senses.

[17]  J. Pringle,et al.  The Response Of A Sense Organ To A Harmonic Stimulus , 1952 .

[18]  A. S. French,et al.  Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  E. Alcorta Characterization of the electroantennogram in Drosophila melanogaster and its use for identifying olfactory capture and transduction mutants. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  John R Carlson,et al.  Chemosensory Coding by Neurons in the Coeloconic Sensilla of the Drosophila Antenna , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .