The effects of social media virality metrics, message framing, and perceived susceptibility on cancer screening intention: The mediating role of fear

Abstract Social media platforms are increasingly playing a vital role in the process of dissemination and sharing of health information. The present study investigated whether and how online health information and virality metrics associated with social media platforms jointly shape persuasive outcomes in the context of cancer screening promotion. One important area of research on cancer screening promotion concerns loss-versus-gain message framing, which has highlighted the persuasive advantage of loss framing relative to gain framing. Given this, we examined how social media virality metrics, loss-versus-gain message framing, and perceived susceptibility influence message-evoked fear and intention to perform colonoscopy in the context of colorectal cancer screening. Results from an online experiment showed that loss framing, relative to gain framing, led to greater message-evoked fear when the message was presented with high-virality metrics, and this pattern was particularly pronounced among those with low perceived susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Furthermore, a formal test of moderated mediation showed that the indirect effect of loss framing on colonoscopy intention through message-evoked fear was significantly moderated by perceived susceptibility to colorectal cancer when the message was presented with high-virality metrics. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Testing Moderator and Mediator Effects in Counseling Psychology Research. , 2004 .

[2]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  The use of social media: an exploratory study of usage among digital natives , 2012 .

[3]  Tao Ma,et al.  User generated content and credibility evaluation of online health information: A meta analytic study , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[4]  M. A. Gerend,et al.  Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  E. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis blog: checking up on health blogs in the blogosphere. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[6]  David Watson,et al.  The PANAS-X manual for the positive and negative affect schedule , 1994 .

[7]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[8]  W. Phillips Davison,et al.  THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT REVISITED , 1996 .

[9]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions , 1993 .

[10]  Jinhee Kim,et al.  Social media metrics: Third-person perceptions of health information , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[12]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[13]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The Strategic Use of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages to Promote Healthy Behavior: How Theory Can Inform Practice , 2006 .

[14]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .

[16]  June Cotte,et al.  Enhancing or disrupting guilt: the role of ad credibility and perceived manipulative intent , 2005 .

[17]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[18]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain , 2006, Science.

[19]  Jonah Berger Contagious: Why Things Catch On , 2013 .

[20]  Alicia de la Peña,et al.  Share, like and achieve: The power of facebook to reach health related goals , 2015 .

[21]  J. Avorn,et al.  Older adults' knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis: results of semistructured interviews used for the development of educational materials. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[22]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[23]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Multiple Affective Outcomes of AIDS PSAs , 1996 .

[24]  R. Lazarus Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[25]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  On the Conditional Cueing of Credibility Heuristics , 2016, Commun. Res..

[26]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[27]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Dillard,et al.  The Effects of Message Framing and Visual Image on Persuasion , 2013 .

[29]  A. Hayes An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation , 2015, Multivariate behavioral research.

[30]  R. L. Donohew,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Fear on Ratings and Impact of Antimarijuana PSAs , 2014, Substance use & misuse.

[31]  John A Updegraff,et al.  Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review , 2012, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[32]  Carlos Cruz,et al.  Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  James Price Dillard,et al.  The Influence of Behavioral Inhibition/Approach Systems and Message Framing on the Processing of Persuasive Health Messages , 2007, Commun. Res..

[34]  Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[35]  M. Laeeq Khan Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[37]  Chen Lou,et al.  From Clicks to Behaviors: The Mediating Effect of Intentions to Like, Share, and Comment on the Relationship Between Message Evaluations and Offline Behavioral Intentions , 2015 .

[38]  Robin L. Nabi Reasoning through emotion: An explication and test of a cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall , 1999 .

[39]  I. Rosenstock Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model , 1974 .

[40]  Hyunyi Cho,et al.  Effects of gain- and loss-framed messages on the sun safety behavior of adolescents: The moderating role of risk perceptions , 2012, Journal of health psychology.

[41]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[42]  C. Fang,et al.  Risk Perceptions and Barriers to Hepatitis B Screening and Vaccination among Vietnamese Immigrants , 2007, Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health.

[43]  Elizabeth L. Cohen What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players' decision to share a prosocial digital game , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Chen Lou,et al.  Alcohol's Getting a Bit More Social: When Alcohol Marketing Messages on Facebook Increase Young Adults’ Intentions to Imbibe , 2015 .

[45]  Elizabeth Taylor Quilliam,et al.  Between Likes and Shares: Effects of Emotional Appeal and Virality on the Persuasiveness of Anticyberbullying Messages on Facebook , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[46]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[47]  S. Kasl,et al.  A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[48]  K. Witte Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[49]  P. Whitten,et al.  The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction , 2016, Journal of Cancer Education.

[50]  Lijiang Shen,et al.  Testing Moderators of Message Framing Effect , 2015, Commun. Res..

[51]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[52]  Stephanie R. Land,et al.  An affective booster moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on behavioral intentions for colorectal cancer screening , 2012, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[53]  H. Brenner,et al.  Protection From Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[54]  Ruobing Li,et al.  Fear Responses to Threat Appeals: Functional Form, Methodological Considerations, and Correspondence Between Static and Dynamic Data , 2017, Commun. Res..

[55]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[56]  B. Larsen [Colorectal cancer screening]. , 2010, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[57]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Communication Processes in Participatory Websites , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..