Exploring the Hype: Investigating Technology Acceptance Factors of Pokémon Go

We investigate the technology acceptance factors of the AR smart-phone game Pokémon Go with a PLS-SEM approach based on the UTAUT2 model by Venkatesh et al. [1]. Therefore, we conducted an online study in Germany with 683 users of the game. Many other studies rely on the users' imagination of the application's functionality or laboratory environments. In contrast, we asked a relatively large user base already interacting in the natural environment with the application. Not surprisingly, the strongest predictor of behavioral intention to play Pokémon Go is hedonic motivation, i.e. fun and pleasure due to playing the game. Additionally, we find medium-sized effects of effort expectancy on behavioral intention, and of habit on behavioral intention and use behavior. These results imply that AR applications — besides needing to be easily integrable in the users' daily life — should be designed in an intuitive and easily understandable way. We contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon of Pokémon Go by investigating established acceptance factors that potentially fostered the massive adoption of the game.

[1]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Nikoleta Yiannoutsou,et al.  A Review of Mobile Location-based Games for Learning across Physical and Virtual Spaces , 2012, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[4]  E. Rimm,et al.  Gotta catch’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[5]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[6]  Greg Welch,et al.  Human Perception and Psychology in Augmented Reality (HPPAR) Summary , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Workshops.

[7]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: An empirical investigation , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[9]  Michael Beigl,et al.  A study of depth perception in hand-held augmented reality using autostereoscopic displays , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[10]  Augmented Reality Video Games: A Commentary on What All Parents andDoctors Should Know , 2016 .

[11]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  A user study on the Snap-To-Feature interaction method , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[12]  Philipp A. Rauschnabel,et al.  Augmented reality smart glasses: an investigation of technology acceptance drivers , 2016 .

[13]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[14]  Hyeoncheol Kim,et al.  Predicting the use of smartphone-based Augmented Reality (AR): Does telepresence really help? , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Usability of one handed interaction methods for hand-held projection-based augmented reality , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[16]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  The Geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and Problematic Effects on Places and Movement , 2017, CHI.

[17]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[18]  Björn J. E. Johansson,et al.  User experience and acceptance of a mixed reality system in a naturalistic setting - a case study , 2006, 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[19]  Eija Kaasinen,et al.  User acceptance of location-aware mobile guides based on seven field studies , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Angélica de Antonio Jiménez,et al.  Acceptability of an A2R Application: Analysis of Correlations between Factors in a TAM , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct).

[21]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[22]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[23]  M. C. tom Dieck,et al.  A theoretical model of mobile augmented reality acceptance in urban heritage tourism , 2018 .

[24]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[25]  Ivan E. Sutherland,et al.  A head-mounted three dimensional display , 1968, AFIPS Fall Joint Computing Conference.

[26]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability , 2010, CHI.

[27]  Marina-Anca Cidotã,et al.  A Haptic Serious Augmented Reality Game for Motor Assessment of Parkinson's Disease Patients , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct).

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVATIONS FOR ONLINE RETAIL SHOPPING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[30]  Stephanie Vogelgesang,et al.  Pokémon GO , 2016, Informatik-Spektrum.

[31]  Arindam Dey,et al.  Tablet versus phone: Depth perception in handheld augmented reality , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[32]  Thomas Olsson,et al.  Online user survey on current mobile augmented reality applications , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[33]  Moez Limayem,et al.  How Habit Limits the Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance , 2007, MIS Q..

[34]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[35]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Constantinos K. Coursaris,et al.  A research agenda for mobile usability , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[37]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[38]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[39]  John Krogstie,et al.  Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[40]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[41]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  User experiences with augmented reality aided navigation on phones , 2011, 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[42]  Pablo Ruiz-Palomino,et al.  Ethical Culture and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Person-Organization Fit , 2013 .

[43]  J. Edward Swan,et al.  Survey of User-Based Experimentation in Augmented Reality , 2005 .

[44]  Marion Koelle,et al.  Don't look at me that way!: Understanding User Attitudes Towards Data Glasses Usage , 2015, MobileHCI.

[45]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[47]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[48]  Tina Harrison,et al.  Augmented Reality Apparel: An Appraisal of Consumer Knowledge, Attitude and Behavioral Intentions , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[49]  Howard Rosenbaum,et al.  Effects of reading proficiency on embedded stem priming in primary school children , 2021 .

[50]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[52]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Usability Studies in Augmented Reality between 2005 and 2014 , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct).

[53]  E. Echeburúa,et al.  Screening Tools for Technological Addictions: A Proposal for the Strategy of Mental Health , 2017, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[54]  M. Campbell,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[55]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Ethical Climate and Purchasing Social Responsibility: A Benevolence Focus , 2013 .

[56]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications , 2012 .

[57]  Frédéric Thiesse,et al.  Extending UTAUT2 to Explore Pervasive Information Systems , 2015, ECIS.

[58]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Testing Moderating Effects in PLS Path Models. An Illustration of Available Procedures , 2005 .

[60]  David Harborth,et al.  Augmented Reality in Information Systems Research: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017, AMCIS.