Experimental feedback control of quantum systems using weak measurements.

A goal of the emerging field of quantum control is to develop methods for quantum technologies to function robustly in the presence of noise. Central issues are the fundamental limitations on the available information about quantum systems and the disturbance they suffer in the process of measurement. In the context of a simple quantum control scenario-the stabilization of nonorthogonal states of a qubit against dephasing-we experimentally explore the use of weak measurements in feedback control. We find that, despite the intrinsic difficultly of implementing them, weak measurements allow us to control the qubit better in practice than is even theoretically possible without them. Our work shows that these more general quantum measurements can play an important role for feedback control of quantum systems.

[1]  F Sciarrino,et al.  Realization of a minimal disturbance quantum measurement. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[2]  H. Yuen.  Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  R. Rosenfeld.  Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[4]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[5]  K J Resch,et al.  Demonstration of a simple entangling optical gate and its use in bell-state analysis. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  Keiji Sasaki,et al.  Demonstration of an optical quantum controlled-NOT gate without path interference. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[7]  Paulo E. M. F. Mendonca,et al.  Quantum Control of a Single Qubit , 2006, quant-ph/0608037.

[8]  H M Wiseman,et al.  Capture and release of a conditional state of a cavity QED system by quantum feedback. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  Vaidman,et al.  Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements. , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[10]  S D Bartlett,et al.  Measuring a photonic qubit without destroying it. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[11]  John K. Stockton,et al.  Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[12]  Christoph Becher,et al.  Feedback cooling of a single trapped ion. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[13]  G. Milburn,et al.  Quantum Measurement and Control , 2009 .

[14]  T. Briant,et al.  Radiation-pressure cooling and optomechanical instability of a micromirror , 2006, Nature.

[15]  B. Camarota,et al.  Approaching the Quantum Limit of a Nanomechanical Resonator , 2004, Science.

[16]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple. , 2005, Physical Review Letters.

[17]  Herschel Rabitz,et al.  Focus on Quantum Control , 2009 .

[18]  Daniel Sigg,et al.  Optical dilution and feedback cooling of a gram-scale oscillator to 6.9 mK. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[19]  S. Gigan,et al.  Self-cooling of a micromirror by radiation pressure , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Marco Barbieri,et al.  Parametric downconversion and optical quantum gates: two's company, four's a crowd , 2009 .

[21]  B L Higgins,et al.  Mixed state discrimination using optimal control. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Measurement of qubits , 2001, quant-ph/0103121.

[23]  E. Lucero,et al.  Reversal of the weak measurement of a quantum state in a superconducting phase qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[24]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement , 2007, Nature.

[25]  D. Berry,et al.  Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation , 2007, Nature.

[26]  Dirk Bouwmeester,et al.  Sub-kelvin optical cooling of a micromechanical resonator , 2006, Nature.

[27]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Quantum cryptography: uncertainty in the service of privacy. , 1992, Science.