Reduction of the Radiotoxicity of Spent Nuclear Fuel Using a Two-Tiered System Comprising Light Water Reactors and Accelerator-Driven Systems

Two main issues regarding the disposal of spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors in the United States in the geological repository Yucca Mountain are: (1) Yucca Mountain is not designed to hold the amount of fuel that has been and is proposed to be generated in the next few decades, and (2) the radiotoxicity (i.e., biological hazard) of the waste (particularly the actinides) does not decrease below that of natural uranium ore for hundreds of thousands of years. One solution to these problems may be to use transmutation to convert the nuclides in spent nuclear fuel to ones with shorter half-lives. Both reactor and accelerator-based systems have been examined in the past for transmutation; there are advantages and disadvantages associated with each. By using existing Light Water Reactors (LWRs) to burn a majority of the plutonium in spent nuclear fuel and Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADSs) to transmute the remainder of the actinides, the benefits of each type of system can be realized. The transmutation process then becomes more efficient and less expensive. This research searched for the best combination of LWRs with multiple recycling of plutonium and ADSs to transmute spent nuclear fuel from past and projected nuclear activities (assuming little growth of nuclear energy). The neutronic design of each system is examined in detail although thermal hydraulic performance would have to be considered before a final system is designed. The results are obtained using the Monte Carlo burnup code Monteburns, which has been successfully benchmarked for MOX fuel irradiation and compared to other codes for ADS calculations. The best combination of systems found in this research includes 41 LWRs burning mixed oxide fuel with two recycles of plutonium ({approx}40 years operation each) and 53 ADSs to transmute the remainder of the actinides from spent nuclear fuel over the course of 60 years of operation.

[1]  J. F. Briesmeister.  MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[2]  Development of Nonfertile and Evolutionary Mixed-Oxide Nuclear Fuels for Use in Existing Water Reactors , 2000 .

[3]  S. R. Greene.  Reactor-Based Plutonium Disposition: Opportunities, Options, and Issues , 1999 .

[4]  A Plutonium-Fueled PWR 2000 , 1995 .

[5]  V. Artisyuk,et al.  Accumulation and Transmutation of Spallation Products in the Target of Accelerator-Driven System , 2001 .

[6]  M. Salvatores,et al.  Plutonium Reload Experience in French Pressurized Water Reactors , 1991 .

[7]  D. W. Muir,et al.  Recent development of the CINDER`90 transmutation code and data library for actinide transmutation studies , 1995 .

[8]  C.H.M Broeders,et al.  Burning transuranium isotopes in thermal and fast reactors , 2000 .

[9]  R. Prael,et al.  Benchmarking Ten Codes Against the Recent GSI Measurements of the Nuclide Yields from 208Pb, 197Au, and 238U + p Reactions at 1 GeV/nucleon , 2001, nucl-th/0208075.

[10]  H. Takano,et al.  A new fuel material for once-through weapons plutonium burning , 1994 .

[11]  G. J. Russell,et al.  LAHET Code System/CINDER`90 validation calculations and comparison with experimental data , 1994 .

[12]  E. Markey.  Nuclear non-proliferation. , 1982, Science.

[13]  O. Hermann.  Benchmark of SCALE (SAS2H) isotopic predictions of depletion analyses for San Onofre PWR MOX fuel , 2000 .

[14]  R.E. MacFarlane,et al.  The NJOY Nu-clear Data Processing System Version 91 , 1994 .

[15]  T. Ogawa,et al.  Partitioning and transmutation studies at JAERI both under OMEGA program and High-Intensity Proton Accelerator Project , 2002 .

[16]  H. R. Trellue,et al.  Nuclear Dynamics Consequence Analysis (NDCA) for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in an Underground Geologic Repository - Volume 3: Appendices , 1998 .

[17]  G. Manent,et al.  Use of plutonium in reactors and comparison of new options studied in France , 1995, Applications of Nuclear Techniques: Neutrons and their Applications.

[18]  W. B. Wilson,et al.  Accelerator transmutation studies at Los Alamos with LAHET, MCNP, and CINDER`90 , 1993 .

[19]  H. Sekimoto,et al.  Parametric Studies on Plutonium Transmutation Using Uranium-Free Fuels in Light Water Reactors , 2000 .

[20]  Patrick Barbrault.  A plutonium-fueled high-moderated pressurized water reactor for the next century , 1996 .

[21]  Holly R. Trellue,et al.  Unfavorable Conditions for Nuclear Criticality Following Disposal of Transuranic Waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2001 .

[22]  James E. Turner,et al.  Atoms, Radiation, and Radiation Protection , 1996 .

[23]  K. Kawai,et al.  Dose coefficients for radionuclides produced in high energy proton accelerator facilities. Coefficients for radionuclides not listed in ICRP publications , 2002 .

[24]  Holly R. Trellue,et al.  Development of Monteburns: A Code That Links MCNP and ORIGEN2 in an Automated Fashion for Burnup Calculations , 1998 .

[25]  H. Wiese.  Investigation of the nuclear inventories of high-exposure PWR mixed oxide fuels with multiple recycling of self-generated plutonium , 1993 .