Elite Interlocks in Three U.S. Sectors: Nonprofit, Corporate, and Government

This study traces elite interlocks between the economic, political, and civil sectors of the United States in the late 1990s. We assess integration and fragmentation through analyzing patterns of overlap and interaction among influential organizations and leaders in these sectors. Network analyses are conducted with UCINET 5 on the Elite Directors Database, a new data set composed of the directors/trustees for the largest organizations in the business and nonprofit sectors in addition to individuals holding positions on federal advisory committees. The complete data set contains individuals holding 3,976 seats from 100 businesses, 109 nonprofit organizations, and 98 government committees. The network structure reveals substantial linkages between organizations and elites within and across the three sectors. Major corporations and their directors are the best integrated in the intersectoral networks. In spite of the tremendous growth of the nonprofit sector, nonprofit organization linkages fail to offer compelling evidence of elite pluralism in the United States.

[1]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  A. Barton,et al.  Elites in Australia , 1979 .

[3]  G. William Domhoff,et al.  Who Rules America? , 2021 .

[4]  Cyril F. Chang,et al.  Revenue diversification among non-profits , 1994 .

[5]  G. Moore,et al.  The Structure of a National Elite Network , 1979, Power in Modern Societies.

[6]  G. Lenski,et al.  Opinion-Making Elites in Yugoslavia. , 1975 .

[7]  David Knoke,et al.  The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains , 1987 .

[8]  M. Weitzman.  The New Nonprofit Almanac and Desk Reference: The Essential Facts and Figures for Managers, Researchers, and Volunteers , 2002 .

[9]  Paul Windolf.  Elite Networks in Germany and Britain , 1998 .

[10]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[11]  C. Wright Mills,et al.  The Power Elite , 1956 .

[12]  E. D. Baltzell,et al.  The Protestant Establishment: Aristocracy and Caste in America , 1964 .

[13]  John Scott.  NETWORKS OF CORPORATE POWER: A Comparative Assessment , 1991 .

[14]  H. Salzman,et al.  Nonprofit Organizations and the Corporate Community , 1983, Social Science History.

[15]  Francie Ostrower.  Why the wealthy give : the culture of elite philanthropy , 1997 .

[16]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors , 1990 .

[17]  Michael Useem,et al.  Pathways to Top Corporate Management , 1986 .

[18]  T. Skocpol,et al.  “Advocates without Members: The Recent Transformation of American Civic Life” , 1999 .

[19]  T. Dye.  Who's Running America? The Clinton Years , 1994 .

[20]  E. Laumann,et al.  Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems , 1976 .

[21]  M. Useem.  Which Business Leaders Help Govern? , 1980 .

[22]  T. Skocpol,et al.  Civic Engagement in American Democracy , 1999 .

[23]  Susan A. Ostrander.  Women of the upper class , 1983 .

[24]  Ursula Hoffmann-Lange.  Positional power and political influence in the Federal Republic of Germany , 1989 .

[25]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[26]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  The Power Structure of American Business. , 1986 .

[27]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Power, Influence and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers , 1968 .

[28]  P. Bonacich.  TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYZING OVERLAPPING MEMBERSHIPS , 1972 .

[29]  W. Quandt.  The comparative study of political elites , 1970 .

[30]  Burton A. Weisbrod,et al.  The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Its Entwining with Private Enterprise and Government , 1997 .

[31]  T. Odendahl,et al.  Charity Begins At Home: Generosity And Self-interest Among The Philanthropic Elite , 1990 .

[32]  S. Giner,et al.  Civic Altruism and Social Policy , 1996 .