Vulnerability Assessment of Drinking Water Treatment Plants

In the aftermath of an earthquake it is essential that drinking Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and the relative distribution network keep their full, or at least, partial functionality. Indeed, a complete failure of such systems, associated to a long restoration time can result in serious damages to facilities and services depending on water supply as well as harmful consequences for the population. Actually, a WTP shutdown can amplify the damages caused by an earthquake in terms of economical and human losses by failing the supply of fire fighting network and consequently the extinguishment of potential fires, as well as getting worse the hygienic and sanitary conditions of population affected by the natural events, thus favouring the outbreaks of epidemics as it happened in Haiti, where cholera killed hundreds of thousands of people after the earthquake of January 12th, 2010. This paper deals with the assessment of seismic vulnerability of WTPs that constitute the first element of the water distribution network by analyzing the effects of past earthquakes on them with the aim of determining the main causes of damage (ground failure, sloshing phenomenon, structural weakness, etc...) as well as the weaker elements and then, on the base of risk analysis theory, drawing fragility curves that can be useful tools for designing reliable new WTPs and controlling the resilience of those already in service.

[1]  Masakatsu Miyajima Damage by the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake , 2012 .

[2]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Industrial accidents triggered by natural hazards: an emerging risk issue , 2011 .

[3]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability of Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2013 .

[4]  Lori Dengler,et al.  Intensity distribution and isoseismal maps for the Northridge, California, earthquake of January 17, 1994 , 1995 .

[5]  Giovanni Fabbrocino,et al.  A peak acceleration threshold for soil liquefaction: lessons learned from the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy) , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[6]  Thomas O'Rourke,et al.  Water, Gas, Electric Power, and Telecommunications Performance , 2000 .

[7]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis , 2003 .

[8]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  T. Lay,et al.  The April 22, 1991, Valle de la Estrella, Costa Rica (Mw = 7.7) earthquake and its tectonic implications: A broadband seismic study , 1993 .

[10]  Alex K. Tang,et al.  Kashiwazaki, Japan, Earthquake of July 16, 2007: Lifeline Performance , 2010 .

[11]  Anshel J. Schiff Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake of January 17, 1995 : lifeline performance , 1999 .

[12]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  An Observational Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability of Industrial Pipelines , 2012 .

[13]  Alex K. Tang,et al.  IZMIT (Kocaeli), Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999, including Duzce Earthquake of November 12, 1999: Lifeline Performance , 2000 .

[14]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Extending the quantitative assessment of industrial risks to earthquake effects. , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Anshel J. Schiff The Loma Prieta, California, earthquake of October 17, 1989 : lifelines , 1998 .

[16]  Donald Ballantyne Reliability and Restoration of Water Supply Systems Following Earthquakes , 1997 .

[17]  F. Magistris,et al.  Vulnerability of Pipelines Subjected to Permanent Deformation Due to Geotechnical Co-seismic Effects , 2013 .

[18]  Hiroyuki Kameda,et al.  Engineering management of lifeline systems under earthquake risk , 2000 .

[19]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Risk assessment and early warning systems for industrial facilities in seismic zones , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..