Coevolution: a history of the macroevolutionary approach to studying host-parasite associations.

The year 1991 marked 100 yr of coevolution research. I have reviewed the first 90 yr of this history. Three chronological phases are apparent: recognition of predictable associations among hosts and their parasites; search for patterns of association and their underlying causes, emphasizing either correlated biogeographic patterns or correlated phylogenies; and development of objective and repeatable methodologies for reconstructing and interpreting these patterns of association. Von Ihering, an outspoken anti-Darwinian, was undoubtedly the first to recognize and make use of predictable host-parasite associations. Kellogg and Fahrenholz, however, had more profound influence on subsequent generations, but in different directions. Kellogg attempted to meld natural selection with speciation by isolation. He also considered host specificity a component of coevolution, important but variable. His work laid the foundation for future research concentrated on biogeographic interpretations of host-parasite relationships. This emphasis and Metcalf's failed attempts to provide adequate mechanisms for reconstructing phylogenies reduced the biogeographic approach to an empirical research program in the hands of Manter. Fahrenholz, on the other hand, exposed to a strong anti-Darwinian sentiment, emphasized the importance of strict host specificity. This led to Eichler's formulation of the first 3 coevolutionary rules and the conclusion that host specificity was not a component but the cause of coevolution and ultimately the tautology inherent in the phylogenetic approach. All had to rely on 1 assumption, that host and parasite phylogenies were reflected in the taxonomic hierarchy. Hennig criticized this assumption and provided a method whereby phylogenies are reconstructed independently. Brooks melded this new phylogenetic method (cladistics) with an equally new biogeographic method (vicariance biogeography), providing the foundations for the modern macroevolutionary approach to studying host-parasite associations.

[1]  G. Klassen,et al.  New approaches to the systematics of the ancyrocephalid Monogenea from Nearctic freshwater fishes. , 1990, The Journal of parasitology.

[2]  M. Metcalf.  Trends in evolution: A discussion of data bearing upon ‘orthogenesis’ , 1928 .

[3]  M. Metcalf.  The Origin and Distribution of the Anura , 1923, American Naturalist.

[4]  H. W. Manter.  Parasites of fishes as biological indicators of recent and ancient conditions. , 1966 .

[5]  M. Metcalf.  The Bell-Toads and Their Opalinid Parasites , 1928, American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Arthur Thomson,et al.  The Evolution Theory , 2022 .

[7]  David L. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[8]  Peter W. Price,et al.  Evolutionary biology of parasites , 1981 .

[9]  W. Matthew.  CLIMATE AND EVOLUTION , 1914 .

[10]  V. Kellogg.  New Mallophaga, I, - with special reference to a collection made from maritime birds of the Bay of Monterey, California , 1896 .

[11]  T. Dobzhansky.  Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .

[12]  V. Kellogg.  New Mallophaga, II, from land birds; together with an account of the Mallophagous mouth-parts , 1896 .

[13]  I. Griffiths.  THE PHYLOGENY OF THE SALIENTIA , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  A. Wegener,et al.  Die Entstehung der Kontinente , 1912 .

[15]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  Macroevolutionary Comparisons of Host and Parasite Phylogenies , 1988 .

[16]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  The Phylogenetic Perspective. (Book Reviews: Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. A Research Program in Comparative Biology.) , 1991 .

[17]  V. Kellogg.  Distribution and Species-Forming of Ecto-Parasites , 1913, American Naturalist.

[18]  E. Dunn.  The Host-Parasite Method and the Distribution of Frogs , 1925, The American Naturalist.

[19]  M. Metcalf.  Parasites and the aid they give in problems of taxonomy, geographical distribution, and paleogeography , 2022 .

[20]  C. Darwin.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[21]  M. Wagner.  Die Darwin'sche Theorie und das Migrationsgesetz der Organismen , 1868 .

[22]  M. Metcalf.  Upon an Important Method of Studying Problems of Relationship and of Geographical Distribution. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  D. Brooks,et al.  Pinworms and Primates: A Case Study in Coevolution , 1982 .

[24]  G. K. Noble.  The Evolution and Dispersal of the Frogs , 1925, The American Naturalist.

[25]  G. Simpson.  Tempo and mode in evolution. , 1946, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. Brooks.  Evolutionary History of Some Plagiorchioid Trematodes of Anurans , 1977 .

[27]  J. H. Sandground.  A Consideration of the Relation of Host-specificity of Helminths and other Metazoan Parasites to the Phenomena of Age Resistance and Acquired Immunity , 1929, Parasitology.

[28]  D. S. Jordan.  The Law of Geminate Species , 1908, The American Naturalist.

[29]  V. Kellogg,et al.  Papers from the Hopkins Stanford Galapagos expedition, 1898-1899. X. Entomological results (8). Mallophaga from birds , 1902 .

[30]  D. Brooks,et al.  Coevolution and Relicts , 1988 .

[31]  P. Bowler.  Evolution: The History of an Idea , 1984 .

[32]  Eric P. Hoberg,et al.  Evolution and Historical Biogeography of a Parasite-Host Assemblage: Alcataenia spp. (Cyclophyllidea: Dilepididae) in Alcidae (Charadriiformes) , 1986 .

[33]  D. Brooks,et al.  Crocodilians and their helminth parasites: macroevolutionary considerations , 1989 .

[34]  S. Nadler,et al.  Phylogenetic trees support the coevolution of parasites and their hosts , 1988, Nature.

[35]  E. Mayr.  The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance , 1983 .

[36]  S. Gardner.  Phyletic coevolution between subterranean rodents of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia: Hystricognathi) and nematodes of the genus Paraspidodera (Heterakoidea: Aspidoderidae) in the Neotropics: temporal and evolutionary implications , 1991 .

[37]  Heinrich Fahrenholz,et al.  Ectoparasiten und Abstammungslehre , 1913 .