Solomon Asch's Legacy for Group Research

Asch's work has had a profound impact on how psychologists think about and study social influence in groups. To appreciate this impact, we must go beyond his classic conformity experiments and consider his broader theoretical framework. This article examines 4 of Asch's ideas that have proven to be particularly influential in later efforts to understand social influence in groups: (a) Social interaction depends on individuals' ability to represent others' positions, define themselves as members of the same group, and regulate their behavior in terms of the norms and values of the group; (b) independence is critical to effective group functioning; (c) independence and conformity are not simply mirror images that can be explained in terms of a unitary psychological process; and (d) change of meaning is an important mechanism of social influence. Finally, Asch's role as a theorist and researcher in the wider area of group dynamics is considered.

[1]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared reality and social influence in groups and organizations. , 2001 .

[2]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  P. Nail Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response , 1986 .

[4]  B. Latané,et al.  The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities. , 1981 .

[5]  W. Wood,et al.  Minority influence: a meta-analytic review of social influence processes. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  L. Resnick,et al.  Social foundations of cognition. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. , 1995 .

[8]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .

[9]  Dominic Abrams,et al.  Social Identification, Self-Categorization and Social Influence , 1990 .

[10]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Impact of group consensus and social support on stimulus meaning: Mediation of conformity by cognitive restructuring. , 1980 .

[11]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. , 1984 .

[12]  S. Asch Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .

[13]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[14]  R. Friend,et al.  A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch ‘conformity’ study , 1990 .

[15]  D. Mackie,et al.  Majority and Minority Influence: A Judgmental Process Analysis , 1990 .

[16]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[17]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[18]  Charles R. Schwenk Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[19]  V. L. Allen Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[20]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[21]  Social support, dissent and conformity. , 1968, Sociometry.

[22]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence And Social Change , 1976 .

[23]  Carol Sherrard,et al.  The power of minorities , 1982 .

[24]  Jesse William Sprowls The conflict of groups. , 1927 .

[25]  Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont Social interaction and cognitive development in children , 1980 .

[26]  G. Mugny,et al.  Socio-epistemic conflict and constructivism , 1994 .

[27]  S. Moscovici Social influence and conformity , 1985 .

[28]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. , 1996 .

[29]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[30]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Homogeneity of jurors , 1978 .

[31]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[32]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  What Is the Relationship Between Socioemotional Behavior and Status in Task Groups? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  R. Buehler,et al.  Change-of-meaning effects in conformity and dissent: Observing construal processes over time. , 1994 .

[34]  W. Doise The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[35]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  Culture and basic psychological principles , 1996 .

[36]  William Ickes,et al.  Naturalistic Social Cognition: Empathic Accuracy in Mixed-Sex Dyads , 1990 .

[37]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[38]  M. Hogg Group Cohesiveness: A Critical Review and Some New Directions , 1993 .

[39]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[40]  Vernon L. Allen,et al.  Social Support for Nonconformity , 1975 .

[41]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[42]  John M. Levine,et al.  Consensus and conformity , 1969 .

[43]  R. Buehler,et al.  Role of construal processes in conformity and dissent. , 1993 .

[44]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  Studies in the Principles of Judgments and Attitudes: II. Determination of Judgments by Group and by Ego Standards , 1940 .