Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk-Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US)-based risk-stratification systems for thyroid nodules in the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines with those of the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association (KTA)/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) and 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines. METHODS From June 2013 to May 2015, a total of 902 consecutive thyroid nodules were enrolled in four institutions, and their US features were retrospectively reviewed and classified using the categories defined by the three guidelines. The malignancy risk of each category, as defined by all three risk-stratification systems, was calculated, and the diagnostic performance of the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) indications of the ATA guidelines were compared to those of the KTA/KSThR and ACR guidelines. RESULTS Of all nodules, 636 (70.5%) were benign and 266 (29.5%) malignant. The calculated malignancy risks for ATA categories 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 nodule(s) were 71.7, 21.5, 2.6, 3.8, and 0%. Of all nodules, 7.6% (69/902) did not meet the ATA pattern criteria, but the malignancy risk was calculated to be 10.1% (7/69). The ATA guidelines afforded significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity (95.0%) than the ACR guidelines (80.2%; p = 0.001) but a lower specificity (38.1 vs. 68.9%; p < 0.001). On the other hand, the ATA guidelines exhibited a lower diagnostic sensitivity than the KTA/KSThR guidelines (100.0%; p = 0.07) but a higher specificity (28.2%; p < 0.001). The unnecessary FNA rate was the lowest when the ACR guidelines were used (25.8%), followed by the ATA (51.2%) and KTA/KSThR (59.4%) guidelines. CONCLUSION The 2015 ATA guidelines afford relatively moderate sensitivity and an unnecessary FNA rate for thyroid cancer detection compared to the 2016 KTA/KSThR and 2017 ACR guidelines. US practitioners require a deep understanding of the benefits and risks of the US-based FNA criteria of different guidelines and potential impact on the diagnosis of low-risk thyroid cancers.

[1]  William D Middleton,et al.  ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  E. J. Ha,et al.  US Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy for Thyroid Malignancy: Diagnostic Performance of Seven Society Guidelines Applied to 2000 Thyroid Nodules. , 2018, Radiology.

[3]  E. J. Ha,et al.  Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasonography: Current Status and Perspectives. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[4]  J. Baek,et al.  Detection of Malignancy Among Suspicious Thyroid Nodules <1 cm on Ultrasound with Various Thyroid Image Reporting and Data Systems. , 2017, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[5]  Kyunghwa Han,et al.  Diagnosis and Management of Small Thyroid Nodules: A Comparative Study with Six Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules. , 2017, Radiology.

[6]  E. J. Ha,et al.  A Multicenter Prospective Validation Study for the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients with Thyroid Nodules , 2016, Korean journal of radiology.

[7]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Insights and clinical questions about the active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas [Review]. , 2016, Endocrine journal.

[8]  Dong Gyu Na,et al.  Ultrasonography Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations , 2016, Korean journal of radiology.

[9]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines. , 2016, Radiology.

[10]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Incidences of Unfavorable Events in the Management of Low-Risk Papillary Microcarcinoma of the Thyroid by Active Surveillance Versus Immediate Surgery , 2016, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.

[11]  Jae Hoon Chung,et al.  Preoperative ultrasonographic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma predict biological behavior. , 2013, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[12]  S. Mandel,et al.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. , 2009, Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association.