Kinematic modeling and error sensitivity analysis for on-machine five-axis laser scanning measurement under machine geometric errors and workpiece setup errors

On-machine scanning measurement of workpiece geometry has a strong advantage in its efficiency, compared to conventional discrete measurement using a touch-trigger probe. When a workpiece is rotated and tilted, position and orientation errors of the workpiece with respect to the machine’s rotary axes can be a significant contributor to the measurement error. Rotary axis geometric errors also influence the measurement error. To establish the traceability of on-machine measurement with workpiece rotation, this paper kinematically formulates their contribution to measured profiles. As a practical application example, this paper presents the measurement error assessment for an axis-symmetric part. Based on the present kinematic model, this paper compares error contributors to the cases (1) where an axis-symmetric part is placed concentric to the rotary axis, and (2) where it is placed away from the rotary axis.

[1]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Formulation of the influence of rotary axis geometric errors on five-axis on-machine optical scanning measurement—application to geometric error calibration by “chase-the-ball” test , 2017 .

[2]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  R-Test Analysis Software for Error Calibration of Five-Axis Machine Tools - Application to a Five-Axis Machine Tool with Two Rotary Axes on the Tool Side - , 2015, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[3]  David R. Lide,et al.  Three Dimensional Metrology , 2018 .

[4]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Measurement of thermal influence on a two-dimensional motion trajectory using a tracking interferometer , 2016 .

[5]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  A machining test to calibrate rotary axis error motions of five-axis machine tools and its application to thermal deformation test , 2014 .

[6]  Josef Mayr,et al.  High precision grey-box model for compensation of thermal errors on five-axis machines , 2014 .

[7]  Aitor Olarra,et al.  Traceability of On-Machine Tool Measurement: A Review , 2017, Sensors.

[8]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Formulation of Influence of Machine Geometric Errors on Five-Axis On-Machine Scanning Measurement by Using a Laser Displacement Sensor , 2015 .

[9]  Bojan Ačko,et al.  Traceability of In-process Measurement of Workpiece Geometry☆ , 2015 .

[10]  William T. Estler,et al.  Advances in Large-Scale Metrology – Review and future trends , 2016 .

[11]  Tilo Pfeifer,et al.  Optical Methods for Dimensional Metrology in Production Engineering , 2002 .

[12]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar , 2002 .

[13]  Danny Shacham New Laser Technology in Turbine Blade Measurements , 2008 .

[14]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test , 2011 .

[15]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Observation of Thermal Influence on Error Motions of Rotary Axes on a Five-Axis Machine Tool by Static R-Test , 2012, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[16]  Yasuhiro Takaya In-Process and On-Machine Measurement of Machining Accuracy for Process and Product Quality Management: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[17]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Traceable Measurements on Machine Tools - Thermal Influences on Machine Tool Structure and Measurement Uncertainty☆ , 2015 .

[18]  S. Nishikawa,et al.  Non-contact Type On-machine Measurement System for Turbine Blade☆ , 2014 .

[19]  Hichem Nouira,et al.  Novel multi-feature bar design for machine tools geometric errors identification , 2016 .

[20]  V. T. Portman,et al.  Accuracy of machine tools , 1988 .

[21]  Laine Mears,et al.  Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: CMM Integration to the Machine Tool , 2009 .

[22]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[23]  Aitor Olarra,et al.  Traceability on Machine Tool Metrology: A Review , 2017 .